Grouping by Proximity or Similarity? Competition between the Gestalt Principles in Vision

The nature of the psychological processes that underlie the Gestalt principles of grouping by proximity and grouping by similarity is examined. Similarity was defined relative to the principles of grouping by common colour and grouping by common shape. Subjects were presented with displays comprising a row of seven coloured shapes and were asked to rate the degree to which the central target shape grouped with either the right or the left flanking shapes. Across the displays the proximal and featural relationships between the target and flankers were varied. These ratings reflected persuasive effects of grouping by proximity and common colour; there was only weak evidence for grouping by common shape. Nevertheless, both common colour and common shape were shown to override grouping by proximity, under certain conditions. The data also show that to understand how the Gestalt principles operate it appears necessary to consider processes that operate within and between groups of elements that are initially identified on the basis of proximity. Whether such groups survive further analysis depends critically on the featural content of the constituent elements.

[1]  M. Wertheimer Laws of organization in perceptual forms. , 1938 .

[2]  I. Rock,et al.  GROUPING BASED ON PHENOMENAL PROXIMITY. , 1964, Journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  L. Zusne,et al.  METRICS OF VISUAL FORM. , 1965, Psychological bulletin.

[4]  J. Beck Effect of orientation and of shape similarity on perceptual grouping , 1966 .

[5]  L Chen,et al.  Topological structure in visual perception. , 1982, Science.

[6]  Michiel P. van Oeffelen,et al.  An algorithm for pattern description on the level of relative proximity , 1983, Pattern Recognit..

[7]  L Harms,et al.  Color segregation and selective attention in a nonsearch task , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  E. Howe,et al.  Dimensionality of judgments of visual patterns varying in amount of symmetry and formal similarity , 1984 .

[9]  F Boselie,et al.  Against the likelihood principle in visual form perception. , 1988, Psychological review.

[10]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[11]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Relational similarity and the nonindependence of features in similarity judgments , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[12]  G. Baylis,et al.  Visual parsing and response competition: The effect of grouping factors , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  D. C. Howell Statistical methods for psychology, 3rd ed. , 1992 .

[14]  Matthew Flatt,et al.  PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers , 1993 .

[15]  G. Logan,et al.  Evaluating a computational model of perceptual grouping by proximity , 1993, Perception & Psychophysics.

[16]  Gordon D. Logan,et al.  THE CODE THEORY OF VISUAL ATTENTION : AN INTEGRATION OF SPACE-BASED AND OBJECT-BASED ATTENTION , 1996 .

[17]  G. Logan The CODE theory of visual attention: an integration of space-based and object-based attention. , 1996, Psychological review.