Assessment of Treatment Response in Patients with Glioblastoma Using O-(2-18F-Fluoroethyl)-l-Tyrosine PET in Comparison to MRI

The assessment of treatment response in glioblastoma is difficult with MRI because reactive blood–brain barrier alterations with contrast enhancement can mimic tumor progression. In this study, we investigated the predictive value of PET using O-(2-18F-fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine (18F-FET PET) during treatment. Methods: In a prospective study, 25 patients with glioblastoma were investigated by MRI and 18F-FET PET after surgery (MRI-/FET-1), early (7–10 d) after completion of radiochemotherapy with temozolomide (RCX) (MRI-/FET-2), and 6–8 wk later (MRI-/FET-3). Maximum and mean tumor-to-brain ratios (TBRmax and TBRmean, respectively) were determined by region-of-interest analyses. Furthermore, gadolinium contrast-enhancement volumes on MRI (Gd-volume) and tumor volumes in 18F-FET PET images with a tumor-to-brain ratio greater than 1.6 (Tvol 1.6) were calculated using threshold-based volume-of-interest analyses. The patients were grouped into responders and nonresponders according to the changes of these parameters at different cutoffs, and the influence on progression-free survival and overall survival was tested using univariate and multivariate survival analyses and by receiver-operating-characteristic analyses. Results: Early after completion of RCX, a decrease of both TBRmax and TBRmean was a highly significant and independent statistical predictor for progression-free survival and overall survival. Receiver-operating-characteristic analysis showed that a decrease of the TBRmax between FET-1 and FET-2 of more than 20% predicted poor survival, with a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 67% (area under the curve, 0.75). Six to eight weeks later, the predictive value of TBRmax and TBRmean was less significant, but an association between a decrease of Tvol 1.6 and PFS was noted. In contrast, Gd-volume changes had no significant predictive value for survival. Conclusion: In contrast to Gd-volumes on MRI, changes in 18F-FET PET may be a valuable parameter to assess treatment response in glioblastoma and to predict survival time.

[1]  Benjamin Koch,et al.  Black Holes and Running Couplings: A Comparison of Two Complementary Approaches , 2013, 1311.1121.

[2]  Wolfgang A Weber,et al.  An interindividual comparison of O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET)- and L-[methyl-11C]methionine (MET)-PET in patients with brain gliomas and metastases. , 2011, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  H. Kostron,et al.  O-(2-18F-Fluoroethyl)-L-Tyrosine PET Predicts Failure of Antiangiogenic Treatment in Patients with Recurrent High-Grade Glioma , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[4]  Gabriele Stoffels,et al.  Prognostic value of early [18F]fluoroethyltyrosine positron emission tomography after radiochemotherapy in glioblastoma multiforme. , 2011, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  H. Herzog,et al.  Prognostic impact of postoperative, pre-irradiation (18)F-fluoroethyl-l-tyrosine uptake in glioblastoma patients treated with radiochemotherapy. , 2011, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[6]  Heinrich Lanfermann,et al.  Advanced MRI and PET imaging for assessment of treatment response in patients with gliomas , 2010, The Lancet Neurology.

[7]  B. Bobek-Billewicz,et al.  Differentiation between brain tumor recurrence and radiation injury using perfusion, diffusion-weighted imaging and MR spectroscopy. , 2010, Folia neuropathologica.

[8]  Timothy D Johnson,et al.  Parametric response map as an imaging biomarker to distinguish progression from pseudoprogression in high-grade glioma. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  Susan M. Chang,et al.  Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: response assessment in neuro-oncology working group. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  W. Heiss,et al.  Patient-Tailored, Imaging-Guided, Long-Term Temozolomide Chemotherapy in Patients with Glioblastoma , 2010, Molecular imaging.

[11]  Manish K. Aghi,et al.  New advances that enable identification of glioblastoma recurrence , 2009, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[12]  C. Boy,et al.  The quantification of dynamic FET PET imaging and correlation with the clinical outcome in patients with glioblastoma , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  Gereon R. Fink,et al.  Volumetry of [11C]-methionine PET uptake and MRI contrast enhancement in patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme , 2009, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[14]  M. Wyss,et al.  Early metabolic responses in temozolomide treated low-grade glioma patients , 2009, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[15]  G. Fink,et al.  Imaging biological activity of a glioblastoma treated with an individual patient-tailored, experimental therapy regimen , 2009, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[16]  T. Cloughesy,et al.  Assess treatment response using FDOPA PET in patients with recurrent malignant gliomas treated with bevacizumab and irinotecan , 2008 .

[17]  Icru Prescribing, recording, and reporting photon beam therapy , 1993 .

[18]  C. Götz,et al.  Serial O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine PET for monitoring the effects of intracavitary radioimmunotherapy in patients with malignant glioma , 2006, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[19]  Karl Herholz,et al.  Use of 11C-methionine PET to monitor the effects of temozolomide chemotherapy in malignant gliomas , 2006, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[20]  S. Goldman,et al.  Integration of [11C]Methionine-Positron Emission Tomographic and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Image-guided Surgical Resection of Infiltrative Low-grade Brain Tumors in Children , 2005, Neurosurgery.

[21]  R. Goldbrunner,et al.  O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine PET for monitoring the effects of convection-enhanced delivery of paclitaxel in patients with recurrent glioblastoma , 2005, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[22]  Martin J. van den Bent,et al.  Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  R. Mirimanoff,et al.  MGMT gene silencing and benefit from temozolomide in glioblastoma. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  Karl-Josef Langen,et al.  O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine PET combined with MRI improves the diagnostic assessment of cerebral gliomas. , 2005, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[25]  Jörg-Christian Tonn,et al.  Value of O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine PET for the diagnosis of recurrent glioma , 2004, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[26]  Anthony Asher,et al.  Survival following surgery and prognostic factors for recently diagnosed malignant glioma: data from the Glioma Outcomes Project. , 2003, Journal of neurosurgery.

[27]  K. Herholz,et al.  Monitoring the Effect of Chemotherapy in a Mixed Glioma by C‐11‐Methionine PET , 2003, Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging.

[28]  K. Hamacher,et al.  Efficient routine production of the 18F-labelled amino acid O-2-18F fluoroethyl-L-tyrosine. , 2002, Applied radiation and isotopes : including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine.

[29]  H. Engler,et al.  Positron emission tomography 11C‐methionine and survival in patients with low‐grade gliomas , 2001 .

[30]  W Vaalburg,et al.  Radiolabeled amino acids: basic aspects and clinical applications in oncology. , 2001, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[31]  A. J. Kumar,et al.  Malignant gliomas: MR imaging spectrum of radiation therapy- and chemotherapy-induced necrosis of the brain after treatment. , 2000, Radiology.

[32]  J. Slattery,et al.  Chemotherapy response criteria in malignant glioma , 1997, Neurology.

[33]  D. Nelson,et al.  Recursive partitioning analysis of prognostic factors in three Radiation Therapy Oncology Group malignant glioma trials. , 1993, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[34]  H. Herzog,et al.  Brain and brain tumor uptake of L-3-[123I]iodo-alpha-methyl tyrosine: competition with natural L-amino acids. , 1991, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[35]  T. Cascino,et al.  Response criteria for phase II studies of supratentorial malignant glioma. , 1990, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[36]  Harold O. Wyckoff,et al.  International Commission ON Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU). , 1974, The American journal of roentgenology, radium therapy, and nuclear medicine.

[37]  Karl Herholz,et al.  Integration of Functional Data (PET) into Brain Surgery Planning and Neuronavigation , 2007 .

[38]  L. D.,et al.  Brain tumors , 2005, Psychiatric Quarterly.

[39]  O. Witte,et al.  Radiation necrosis or recurrence. , 1996, Journal of neurosurgery.