How does adding versus self-generating a hierarchical outline while learning from a multimedia document influence students' performances?

Abstract The present study investigated the effects of a visual aid (i.e., hierarchical outline) on students' multimedia learning. We expected the presence of this aid to improve students' learning from a multimedia document, by making the relevant information more salient and explicitly highlighting the text's structure. We postulated that asking students to self-generate an outline during learning would involve them in generative processing (selection and organization), thereby promoting effective learning ( generative hypothesis ). However, the generation activity might prove too demanding and overload students' cognitive capacity, thus impairing their learning ( cognitive load hypothesis ). When we compared the learning of students who viewed a readymade outline, generated one themselves, or studied a text with no outline at all, we found that providing an outline enhanced students' retention and transfer performances compared with the control group. Contrary to the generative hypothesis and consistent with the cognitive load hypothesis, the group who self-generated a hierarchical outline performed more poorly on the retention and transfer tests than those who viewed a readymade one.

[1]  Robert F. Lorch,et al.  SARA: A Text-Based and Reader-Based Theory of Signaling , 2008 .

[2]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning , 2001, Visible Learning Guide to Student Achievement.

[3]  Martin Reisslein,et al.  Using Virtual Peers to Guide Visual Attention During Learning , 2010, J. Media Psychol. Theor. Methods Appl..

[4]  Nancy Lockitch Loman,et al.  SIGNALING TECHNIQUES THAT INCREASE THE UNDERSTANDABILITY OF EXPOSITORY PROSE , 1983 .

[5]  Robert F. Lorch,et al.  Signaling Hierarchical and Sequential Organization in Expository Text , 2011 .

[6]  Robert F. Lorch,et al.  Understanding How Headings Influence Text Processing , 2012 .

[7]  M. Wittrock Learning as a Generative Process , 1974 .

[8]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  An eye movement analysis of highlighting and graphic organizer study aids for learning from expository text , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[9]  J. Surber,et al.  Effect of prior domain knowledge and headings on processing of informative text , 2007 .

[10]  M. Wittrock Generative Processes of Comprehension , 1989 .

[11]  F. Paas Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: A cognitive-load approach. , 1992 .

[12]  Jean Pierre Rossi,et al.  The function of frame in the comprehension of scientific text. , 1990 .

[13]  R. Mayer,et al.  Learning as a Generative Activity: Eight Learning Strategies that Promote Understanding , 2015 .

[14]  Markeya S. Peteranetz,et al.  Using Eye-Tracking Technology to Understand How Graphic Organizers Aid Student Learning , 2017 .

[15]  Claire E. Weinstein,et al.  Self-regulation and learning strategies , 2011 .

[16]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Advanced Outlines, Familiarity, and Text Genre on Retention of Prose. , 1980 .

[17]  Nekane Balluerka,et al.  The Influence of Instructions, Outlines, and Illustrations on the Comprehension and Recall of Scientific Texts. , 1995 .

[18]  R. F. Lorch,et al.  Effects of signaling topic structure on text recall , 1993 .

[19]  Robert F. Lorch,et al.  Three Information Functions of Headings: A Test of the SARA Theory of Signaling , 2011 .

[20]  M. Wittrock Generative Teaching of Comprehension , 1991, The Elementary School Journal.

[21]  T. Gog,et al.  Effects of pairs of problems and examples on task performance and different types of cognitive load , 2014 .

[22]  R. Mayer Models for Understanding , 1989 .

[23]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning: Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning , 2005 .

[24]  Johanna K. Kaakinen,et al.  Individual Differences in Reading To Summarize Expository Text: Evidence from Eye Fixation Patterns. , 2002 .

[25]  B. K. Britton,et al.  Effects of Text Structure on Use of Cognitive Capacity during Reading. , 1982 .

[26]  Linda K. Cook,et al.  Techniques that Help Readers Build Mental Models from Scientific Text: Definitions Pretraining and Signaling. , 1984 .

[27]  M. Wittrock Generative Learning Processes of the Brain , 1992 .

[28]  B. K. Britton,et al.  Text-Comprehension Strategies Based on Outlines: Immediate and Long-Term Effects. , 1985 .

[29]  Robert F. Lorch,et al.  Effects of Headings on Text Processing Strategies. , 2001, Contemporary educational psychology.

[30]  R. Moreno,et al.  Cognitive load and learning effects of having students organize pictures and words in multimedia environments: The role of student interactivity and feedback , 2005 .

[31]  Robert F. Lorch,et al.  On-line processing of the topic structure of a text ☆ , 1985 .

[32]  J. Hyönä,et al.  Vertical perceptual span and the processing of visual signals in reading. , 2010, International journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie.

[33]  Hung-Tao Chen,et al.  Communicating headings and preview sentences in text and speech. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[34]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  The Teaching of Learning Strategies. , 1983 .

[35]  André Tricot,et al.  How may multimedia and hypertext documents support deep processing for learning? Comment les documents multimédias et hypertextes peuvent contribuer à des traitements profonds pour l'apprentissage ? , 2017 .

[36]  Jukka Hyönä,et al.  Effects of Topic Headings on Text Processing: Evidence from Adult Readers' Eye Fixation Patterns. , 2004 .

[37]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Toward a model of text comprehension and production. , 1978 .

[38]  Jukka Hyönä,et al.  Do adult readers know how they read? Evidence from eye movement patterns and verbal reports. , 2006, British journal of psychology.

[39]  R. F. Lorch,et al.  Effects of organizational signals on free recall of expository text , 1996 .

[40]  Krista E. DeLeeuw,et al.  A Comparison of Three Measures of Cognitive Load: Evidence for Separable Measures of Intrinsic, Extraneous, and Germane Load , 2008 .

[41]  Robert F. Lorch,et al.  Signaling topic structure via headings or preview sentences , 2013 .

[42]  Andrew T. Stull,et al.  Three Experimental Comparisons of Learner-generated versus Author-provided Graphic Organizers , 2007 .

[43]  Daniel H. Robinson,et al.  Visual argument: Graphic organizers are superior to outlines in improving learning from text. , 1995 .

[44]  R. Mayer,et al.  Eight Ways to Promote Generative Learning , 2016 .

[45]  M. McDaniel,et al.  Enhancing learning during lecture note-taking using outlines and illustrative diagrams , 2015 .

[46]  Robert F. Lorch,et al.  Effects of organizational signals on text-processing strategies. , 1995 .