One Action System or Two? Evidence for Common Central Preparatory Mechanisms in Voluntary and Stimulus-Driven Actions

Human behavior is comprised of an interaction between intentionally driven actions and reactions to changes in the environment. Existing data are equivocal concerning the question of whether these two action systems are independent, involve different brain regions, or overlap. To address this question we investigated whether the degree to which the voluntary action system is activated at the time of stimulus onset predicts reaction times to external stimuli. We recorded event-related potentials while participants prepared and executed left- or right-hand voluntary actions, which were occasionally interrupted by a stimulus requiring either a left- or right-hand response. In trials where participants successfully performed the stimulus-driven response, increased voluntary motor preparation was associated with faster responses on congruent trials (where participants were preparing a voluntary action with the same hand that was then required by the target stimulus), and slower responses on incongruent trials. This suggests that early hand-specific activity in medial frontal cortex for voluntary action trials can be used by the stimulus-driven system to speed responding. This finding questions the clear distinction between voluntary and stimulus-driven action systems.

[1]  Florian Waszak,et al.  ERP correlates of action effect prediction and visual sensory attenuation in voluntary action , 2011, NeuroImage.

[2]  W. Prinz,et al.  Neural and behavioral correlates of intentional actions , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  R. Passingham,et al.  Medial frontal cortex: from self-generated action to reflection on one's own performance , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[4]  Sukhvinder S. Obhi,et al.  Changing the "when" and "what" of intended actions. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  Franck Vidal,et al.  Neural inhibition and interhemispheric connections in two-choice reaction time: a Laplacian ERP study. , 2009, Psychophysiology.

[6]  P. Haggard Human volition: towards a neuroscience of will , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[7]  C. Kennard,et al.  Functional role of the supplementary and pre-supplementary motor areas , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[8]  Peter Praamstra,et al.  The Neurophysiology of Response Competition: Motor Cortex Activation and Inhibition following Subliminal Response Priming , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  G. Aschersleben,et al.  Intention-based and stimulus-based mechanisms in action selection , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  Sukhvinder S. Obhi,et al.  Internally generated and externally triggered actions are physically distinct and independently controlled , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[11]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[12]  R. Passingham,et al.  Attention to Intention , 2004, Science.

[13]  Franck Vidal,et al.  The nature of unilateral motor commands in between-hand choice tasks as revealed by surface Laplacian estimation. , 2003, Psychophysiology.

[14]  H. Spinnler,et al.  Utilisation Behaviour Consequent to Bilateral SMA Softening , 2002, Cortex.

[15]  M. W. Molen,et al.  A psychophysiological analysis of inhibitory motor control in the stop-signal paradigm , 2001, Biological Psychology.

[16]  R. Passingham,et al.  Self-initiated versus externally triggered movements. II. The effect of movement predictability on regional cerebral blood flow. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[17]  M. Hallett,et al.  Mesial motor areas in self-initiated versus externally triggered movements examined with fMRI: effect of movement type and rate. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  P. Haggard,et al.  On the relation between brain potentials and the awareness of voluntary movements , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  G. Band,et al.  Inhibitory motor control in stop paradigms: review and reinterpretation of neural mechanisms. , 1999, Acta psychologica.

[20]  A. Cools,et al.  Dipole source analysis suggests selective modulation of the supplementary motor area contribution to the readiness potential. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[21]  G. McCarthy,et al.  Functional organization of human supplementary motor cortex studied by electrical stimulation , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[22]  M. Coles Modern mind-brain reading: psychophysiology, physiology, and cognition. , 1989, Psychophysiology.

[23]  Curtis A. Gleason,et al.  Time of conscious intention to act in relation to onset of cerebral activity (readiness-potential). The unconscious initiation of a freely voluntary act. , 1983, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[24]  W. Walter,et al.  Contingent Negative Variation : An Electric Sign of Sensori-Motor Association and Expectancy in the Human Brain , 1964, Nature.

[25]  Sam J. Gilbert,et al.  Modification of planned actions , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[26]  W. Schultz,et al.  Neuronal activity preceding self-initiated or externally timed arm movements in area 6 of monkey cortex , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[27]  S. Wise,et al.  Premotor and supplementary motor cortex in rhesus monkeys: neuronal activity during externally- and internally-instructed motor tasks , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[28]  Astor Kt,et al.  Intention and reactivity. , 2002 .