Drivers' reactions to sudden braking by lead car under varying workload conditions; towards a driver support system

At urban intersections drivers handle multiple tasks simultaneously, making urban driving a complex task. An advanced driver assistance system may support drivers in this specific driving task, but the design details of such a system need to be determined before they can be fully deployed. A driving simulator experiment was conducted to determine the relationship between different subtasks of driving at urban intersections. Participants completed four drives, each comprising 20 comparable intersections with different traffic situations and encountered one unexpected braking event during the experiment. The effects of varying levels of event urgency on the relationship between different driving subtasks were studied. Furthermore, the influence of workload on this relationship was determined by giving half of the subjects an additional cognitive task. After the lead car braked unexpectedly, participants reduced speed and increased headway depending on the urgency of the braking event. Depending on the workload, participants returned to the normal speed and headway again after a number of intersections. Participants experiencing a high-workload drove more smoothly, except for those who had experienced the most urgent unexpected event. High workload additionally affected the length of the adjustments to the unexpected event.

[1]  H Lunenfeld,et al.  DRIVER EXPECTANCY IN HIGHWAY DESIGN AND TRAFFIC OPERATIONS. FINAL REPORT , 1986 .

[2]  S. Hart,et al.  Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research , 1988 .

[3]  K A Brookhuis,et al.  The effects of mobile telephoning on driving performance. , 1991, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[4]  T A Ranney,et al.  Models of driving behavior: a review of their evolution. , 1994, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  Dick de Waard,et al.  The measurement of drivers' mental workload , 1996 .

[6]  Olsson Measuring Driver Visual Distraction with a Peripheral Detection Task , 2000 .

[7]  Dick de Waard,et al.  Behavioural impacts of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems–an overview , 2019, European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research.

[8]  M. A. Recarte,et al.  Mental workload while driving: effects on visual search, discrimination, and decision making. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[9]  Karel Brookhuis,et al.  ADAS' acceptance and effects on behaviour: The consequences of automation? , 2005 .

[10]  Karel Brookhuis,et al.  ADAS' Acceptance and Effects on Behaviour , 2005 .

[11]  Georg Jahn,et al.  Peripheral detection as a workload measure in driving: Effects of traffic complexity and route guidance system use in a driving study , 2005 .

[12]  Karel Brookhuis,et al.  Behavioural effects of Advanced Cruise Control Use - a meta-analytic approach , 2005 .

[13]  Louis Tijerina,et al.  Driver Workload Metrics Task 2 Final Report , 2006 .

[14]  Jeroen Hogema,et al.  Driving simulator assessment for human factors research , 2007 .

[15]  Marika Hoedemaeker,et al.  Impacts of a Congestion Assistant on driving behaviour and acceptance using a driving simulator , 2007 .

[16]  A.R.A. van der Horst,et al.  Influence of unexpected events on driving behaviour at different hierarchical levels: A driving simulator experiment , 2008 .

[17]  J Lockhart,et al.  The effects of practice with MP3 players on driving performance. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.