Evaluation of the 6-F ExoSeal Vascular Closure Device in Antegrade Femoral Artery Punctures

Purpose To evaluate the safety, comfort, and efficacy of an extravascularly deployed bioabsorbable plug–based vascular closure device (VCD) for sealing 6-F antegrade access sites in patients requiring peripheral endovascular intervention. Methods A single-center, single-arm, prospective study to evaluate the 6-F ExoSeal VCD in terms of technical success, adverse events, and patient comfort enrolled 59 unselected symptomatic patients (42 men; mean age 72.1±9.3 years) suffering from peripheral artery disease in an 11-month period. Patients with high body mass index (BMI) or calcification at the access site were not excluded. Calcifications of the access vessel were scored as grades 1–4 from fluoroscopic images. The pain level during implantation was evaluated after the procedure using a visual rating scale. Results Technical success rate was 98.3%; 1 primary device failure was converted to manual compression. In addition, 1 (1.7%) pseudoaneurysm, 2 (3.4%) minor hematomas, and 1 (1.7%) minor secondary bleeding were observed. There was no intravascular application of the device detected. Neither BMI, calcification of the access vessel (present in 74.6%, mean score 1.4±1.1), age, nor blood clotting had any statistically significant influence on adverse events. In total, 55 (93.2%) patients felt no pain during the VCD implantation. Conclusion The tested VCD was safe, with an excellent technical success rate even in cases with severe access vessel calcification.

[1]  C. Bartolozzi,et al.  Efficacy and Safety of a Novel Vascular Closure Device (Glubran 2 Seal) After Diagnostic and Interventional Angiography in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease , 2013, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology.

[2]  S. Fichtlscherer,et al.  First-in-man experience with a new 7F vascular closure device (EXOSEAL™): the 7F ECLIPSE study. , 2012, Journal of interventional cardiology.

[3]  G. Fraedrich,et al.  Incidence and treatment of local stenosis or occlusion at the vascular access site leading to limb ischemia and new‐onset intermittent claudication after percutaneous interventions: Implications of Vascular Closure Devices , 2012, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[4]  A. Buecker,et al.  Obesity: An Independent Risk Factor for Insufficient Hemostasis Using the AngioSeal Vascular Closure Device After Antegrade Puncture , 2012, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology.

[5]  S. Spiliopoulos,et al.  Safety and Efficacy of the StarClose Vascular Closure Device in More Than 1000 Consecutive Peripheral Angioplasty Procedures , 2011, Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists.

[6]  R. Kloner,et al.  Review of vascular closure devices. , 2010, The Journal of invasive cardiology.

[7]  F. Garaci,et al.  Efficacy and Safety of Antegrade Common Femoral Artery Access Closure Using the Angio-Seal Device: Experience with 1889 Interventions for Critical Limb Ischemia in Diabetic Patients , 2010, Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists.

[8]  F. Biancari,et al.  Meta-analysis of randomized trials on the efficacy of vascular closure devices after diagnostic angiography and angioplasty. , 2010, American heart journal.

[9]  L. S. Schultze Kool,et al.  Acute arterial occlusion after deployment of the Angio-Seal closure device: is it as uncommon as we think? , 2009, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[10]  Hong Wang,et al.  A randomized comparison of a novel bioabsorbable vascular closure device versus manual compression in the achievement of hemostasis after percutaneous femoral procedures: the ECLIPSE (Ensure's Vascular Closure Device Speeds Hemostasis Trial). , 2009, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[11]  C. Narins,et al.  Access strategies for peripheral arterial intervention. , 2009, Cardiology journal.

[12]  P. Thurley,et al.  Re: Looby et al.: “Efficacy and Safety of the Angioseal Vascular Closure Device Post Antegrade Puncture” , 2008, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology.

[13]  T. Carrel,et al.  Complications Associated With the Arterial Puncture Closure Device—Angio-Seal , 2008, Vascular and endovascular surgery.

[14]  A. Keeling,et al.  Efficacy and Safety of the Angioseal Vascular Closure Device Post Antegrade Puncture , 2008, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology.

[15]  H. Dauerman,et al.  Vascular closure devices: the second decade. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  John V. White,et al.  Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease (TASC II). , 2007, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[17]  E. Dregelid,et al.  Complications associated with the Angio-Seal arterial puncture closing device: intra-arterial deployment and occlusion by dissected plaque. , 2006, Journal of vascular surgery.

[18]  J. Bacharach,et al.  Claudication secondary to Perclose use after percutaneous procedures , 2006 .

[19]  W. Little,et al.  Vascular complications with newer generations of angioseal vascular closure devices. , 2006, Journal of interventional cardiology.

[20]  S. Pocock,et al.  Vascular complications associated with arteriotomy closure devices in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary procedures: a meta-analysis. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[21]  S. Katz,et al.  The use of the Angioseal device for femoral artery closure. , 2004, Journal of vascular surgery.

[22]  M. Müllner,et al.  Arterial puncture closing devices compared with standard manual compression after cardiac catheterization: systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2004, JAMA.

[23]  R. Uberoi,et al.  Retrograde vs. Antegrade Puncture for Infra-Inguinal Angioplasty , 2003, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology.

[24]  D. Heck,et al.  Infectious complications of perclose for closure of femoral artery punctures. , 2002, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[25]  C. Moore,et al.  Complications of femoral artery closure devices , 1999, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[26]  M. Rosen,et al.  Classifying complications of interventional procedures: a survey of practicing radiologists. , 2001, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[27]  J. Eidt,et al.  Surgical complications from hemostatic puncture closure devices. , 1999, American journal of surgery.