The Dutch mobility panel: Experiences and evaluation

The aim of this paper is to give an overview of the history and research experiences of the Dutch National Mobility Panel. Attention is given to the sampling strategy, the policy goals, and the representativity of the panel. It also tries to evaluate the research outcomes in terms of the original objectives and in view of more general research and policy goals. In sections one and two, a historic overview is given, starting from the first ideas to implement a longitudinal research instrument in transportation planning. In section three, some attention is devoted to longitudinal versus cross-sectional analyses. In section four, the sample design is treated in some detail. Next, various forms of bias are discussed that affect the representativity of the panel. In the sixth section, an overview is given of the research conducted with the data. Some conclusions are given in the final section.

[1]  L. Wissen,et al.  A JOINT HOUSEHOLD TRAVEL DISTANCE GENERATION AND CAR OWNERSHIP MODEL , 1989 .

[2]  Henk Meurs,et al.  ANALYSES OF PANEL DATA ---ANALYSES OF PANEL DATA, PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROUND TABLE CONFERENCE ON THE LONGITUDINAL TRAVEL STUDY, THE HAGUE, MAY 14-15, 1987 , 1988 .

[3]  H Meurs,et al.  Modeling the Dynamics of Passenger Travel Demand by Using Structural Equations , 1988 .

[4]  P. Jones,et al.  Understanding Travel Behaviour , 1983 .

[5]  David A. Hensher,et al.  Dimensions of Automobile Demand: An Overview of an Australian Research Project , 1986 .

[6]  H Meurs,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF STRUCTURAL EQUATIONS MODELS OF THE DYNAMICS OF PASSENGER TRAVEL DEMAND , 1986 .

[7]  Henk Meurs,et al.  Trip generation models with permanent unobserved effects , 1990 .

[8]  Thomas F. Golob,et al.  DYNAMIC TESTS OF A TIME-SPACE MODEL OF COMPLEX TRAVEL BEHAVIOR , 1987 .

[9]  M. Dix,et al.  Error and uncertainty in travel surveys , 1981 .

[10]  Neil Wrigley,et al.  Quantitative Methods: The Era of Longitudinal Data Analysis , 1986 .

[11]  Neil Wrigley,et al.  Stochastic Panel-Data Models of Urban Shopping Behaviour: 3. The Interaction of Store Choice and Brand Choice , 1984 .

[12]  Richard B. Davies,et al.  A joint trip timing store-type choice model for grocery shopping, including inventory effects and nonparametric control for omitted variables , 1987 .

[13]  Neil Wrigley,et al.  Stochastic Panel-Data Models of Urban Shopping Behaviour: 2. Multistore Purchasing Patterns and the Dirichlet Model , 1984 .

[14]  Phil Goodwin,et al.  THE CASE FOR HETERODOXY IN LONGITUDINAL ANALYSIS , 1987 .

[15]  W W Recker,et al.  DYNAMIC ANALYSES OF COMPLEX TRAVEL BEHAVIOUR USING A SUBSAMPLE OF THE DUTCH NATIONAL MOBILITY PANEL ---ANALYSES OF PANEL DATA, PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROUND TABLE CONFERENCE ON THE LONGITUDINAL TRAVEL STUDY, THE HAGUE, MAY 14-15, 1987 , 1988 .

[16]  R Dunn,et al.  Stochastic Panel-Data Models of Urban Shopping Behaviour: 1. Purchasing at Individual Stores in a Single City , 1984 .

[17]  M. Hannan,et al.  Social Dynamics: Models and Methods. , 1986 .

[18]  Henk Meurs,et al.  Biases in response over time in a seven-day travel diary , 1986 .

[19]  Thomas F. Golob,et al.  A Simultaneous Dynamic Travel And Activities Time Allocation Model , 1989 .

[20]  Thomas F. Golob,et al.  A STRUCTURAL MODEL OF TEMPORAL CHANGE IN MULTI-MODAL TRAVEL DEMAND , 1987 .

[21]  David A. Hensher,et al.  ISSUES IN THE PRE-ANALYSIS OF PANEL DATA , 1987 .

[22]  T. Golob STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING OF THE DYNAMICS OF TRAVEL CHOICE BEHAVIOR , 1988 .

[23]  Neil Wrigley,et al.  The Cardiff Consumer Panel: methodological aspects of the conduct of a long-term panel survey , 1985 .

[24]  Cheng Hsiao,et al.  Analysis of Panel Data , 1987 .

[25]  Arnim H. Meyburg,et al.  CONSIDERATION OF NONRESPONSE EFFECTS IN LARGE-SCALE MOBILITY SURVEYS , 1981 .

[26]  Neil Wrigley,et al.  Stochastic Panel-Data Models of Urban Shopping Behaviour: 4. Incorporating Independent Variables into the NBD and Dirichlet Models , 1985 .

[27]  Ryuichi Kitamura,et al.  A PANEL ANALYSIS OF HOUSEHOLD CAR OWNERSHIP AND MOBILITY , 1987 .

[28]  Randolph W. Hall,et al.  Direct versus terminal freight routing on a network with concave costs , 1987 .

[29]  Arnim H. Meyburg,et al.  NONRESPONSE PROBLEM IN TRAVEL SURVEYS: AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION , 1980 .

[30]  David A. Hensher,et al.  LONGITUDINAL SURVEYS IN TRANSPORT: AN ASSESSMENT , 1983 .

[31]  Frank S. Koppelman,et al.  An examination of the determinants of day-to-day variability in individuals' urban travel behavior , 1986 .

[32]  Thomas F. Golob,et al.  A dynamic analysis of travel demand , 1986 .

[33]  Ryuichi Kitamura,et al.  Analysis of attrition biases and trip reporting errors for panel data , 1987 .

[34]  T. Hoorn,et al.  Regularity and irreversibility of weekly travel behavior , 1987 .

[35]  H E Smart THE DYNAMICS OF CHANGE - APPLICATIONS OF THE PANEL TECHNIQUE TO TRANSPORTATION SURVEYS IN TYNE AND WEAR , 1984 .