Impact of backwash water composition on ultrafiltration fouling control

This paper investigates the impacts of different components in backwash water on ultrafiltration (UF) fouling control. Natural surface water was used as feed water, different backwash waters with different Ca2+ and Na+ concentrations were prepared by dosing CaCl2 and NaCl into demineralized water. Furthermore, UF permeate containing mainly natural organic matter (NOM) with minimal cations (Ca2+ and Na+) was produced by dialysis and used for backwashing as well. Thus, the efficiency of different backwash waters on UF fouling control was evaluated. Results show that the presence of both divalent (Ca2+) and monovalent cations (Na+) in backwash water reduces the fouling control efficiency. Since the negative charges of UF membranes and NOM compounds are screened by the cations during filtration, NOM can easily deposit on the surface of the UF membrane, causing fouling. When the mono- and divalent cations are absent in the backwash water, the charge-screening effect around the negatively charged UF membrane and NOM is reduced, increasing the repulsion force between them. In addition to the charge-screening effect, the absence of calcium in backwash water can also reduce the calcium-bridging effect between the membrane and NOM, increasing the fouling control efficiency of the backwash. Measurements of the streaming potential indicate that backwashing with demineralized water can maintain the negative charge of the membrane. Organic compounds in the backwash water do not influence the fouling control efficiency of the backwash.

[1]  M. Clark,et al.  Effects of background cations on the fouling of polyethersulfone membranes by natural organic matter : Experimental and molecular modeling study , 2008 .

[2]  W. Pronk,et al.  Interplay of different NOM fouling mechanisms during ultrafiltration for drinking water production. , 2007, Water research.

[4]  Gurdev Singh,et al.  Experimental correlations of pH and ionic strength effects on the colloidal fouling potential of silica nanoparticles in crossflow ultrafiltration , 2007 .

[5]  M. Elimelech,et al.  Mechanisms of colloidal natural organic matter fouling in ultrafiltration , 2006 .

[6]  Mark R. Wiesner,et al.  Fouling in tangential-flow ultrafiltration : the effect of colloid size and coagulation pretreatment , 1990 .

[7]  Jaeweon Cho,et al.  Membrane filtration of natural organic matter: factors and mechanisms affecting rejection and flux decline with charged ultrafiltration (UF) membrane , 2000 .

[8]  Gurdev Singh,et al.  Influence of various monovalent cations and calcium ion on the colloidal fouling potential. , 2005, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[9]  K. Katsoufidou,et al.  Experimental study of ultrafiltration membrane fouling by sodium alginate and flux recovery by backwashing , 2007 .

[10]  T. Egli,et al.  Correlations between total cell concentration, total adenosine tri-phosphate concentration and heterotrophic plate counts during microbial monitoring of drinking water , 2008 .

[11]  J.Q.J.C. Verberk,et al.  Blocking of capillaries as fouling mechanism for dead-end ultrafiltration , 2007 .

[12]  Naiyun Gao,et al.  Effect of coagulation pretreatment on fouling of an ultrafiltration membrane , 2007 .

[13]  L. Fan,et al.  Influence of the characteristics of natural organic matter on the fouling of microfiltration membranes. , 2001, Water research.

[14]  Andrew L. Zydney,et al.  Effects of solution environment on humic acid fouling during microfiltration , 1999 .

[15]  Nai-Yun Gao,et al.  Effect of coagulation pretreatment on the fouling of ultrafiltration membrane. , 2007, Journal of environmental sciences.

[16]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Chemical and physical aspects of natural organic matter (NOM) fouling of nanofiltration membranes , 1997 .

[17]  Removal of natural organic matter from water by in-line coagulation/ultrafiltration process , 2006 .

[18]  H. Yamamura,et al.  Influence of calcium on the evolution of irreversible fouling in microfiltration/ultrafiltration membranes , 2007 .

[19]  Stefan Panglisch,et al.  Drinking water treatment with combined coagulation ultrafiltration—long term experience with Germany's largest plant , 2008 .

[20]  Ineke G.M. Punt,et al.  Hollow fiber dead-end ultrafiltration: Influence of ionic environment on filtration of alginates , 2008 .

[21]  J. V. Dijk,et al.  An innovative treatment concept for future drinking water production: fluidized ion exchange – ultrafiltration – nanofiltration – granular activated carbon filtration , 2009 .

[22]  A. Abrahamse,et al.  Removal of divalent cations reduces fouling of ultrafiltration membranes , 2008 .