Practical Scheffé‐type credibility intervals for variables of a groundwater model

Simultaneous Scheffe-type credibility intervals (the Bayesian version of confidence intervals) for variables of a groundwater flow model calibrated using a Bayesian maximum a posteriori procedure were derived by Cooley [1993b]. It was assumed that variances reflecting the expected differences between observed and model-computed quantities used to calibrate the model are known, whereas they would often be unknown for an actual model. In this study the variances are regarded as unknown, and variance variability from observation to observation is approximated by grouping the data so that each group is characterized by a uniform variance. The credibility intervals are calculated from the posterior distribution, which was developed by considering each group variance to be a random variable about which nothing is known a priori, then eliminating it by integration. Numerical experiments using two test problems illustrate some characteristics of the credibility intervals. Nonlinearity of the statistical model greatly affected some of the credibility intervals, indicating that credibility intervals computed using the standard linear model approximation may often be inadequate to characterize uncertainty for actual field problems. The parameter characterizing the probability level for the credibility intervals was, however, accurately computed using a linear model approximation, as compared with values calculated using second-order and fully nonlinear formulations. This allows the credibility intervals to be computed very efficiently.

[1]  D. Katz,et al.  Bayesian Approach to the Analysis of Nonlinear Models: Implementation and Evaluation , 1981 .

[2]  Richard L. Cooley,et al.  CALCULATION OF NONLINEAR CONFIDENCE AND PREDICTION INTERVALS FOR GROUND-WATER FLOW MODELS. , 1987 .

[3]  R. L. Cooley Exact Scheffé-type confidence intervals for output from groundwater flow models: 2. Combined use of hydrogeologic information and calibration data , 1993 .

[4]  E. Lehmann Testing Statistical Hypotheses , 1960 .

[5]  Richard L. Cooley,et al.  Simultaneous confidence and prediction intervals for nonlinear regression models with application to a groundwater flow model , 1987 .

[6]  Richard L. Cooley,et al.  Exact Scheffé-type confidence intervals for output from groundwater flow models. 1. Use of hydrogeologic information , 1993 .

[7]  Reuven Y. Rubinstein,et al.  Simulation and the Monte Carlo method , 1981, Wiley series in probability and mathematical statistics.

[8]  M. G. Marietta,et al.  Pilot Point Methodology for Automated Calibration of an Ensemble of Conditionally Simulated Transmissivity Fields: 2. Application , 1995 .

[9]  Richard L. Cooley,et al.  Confidence Intervals for Ground‐Water Models Using Linearization, Likelihood, and Bootstrap Methods , 1997 .

[10]  Keith Beven,et al.  The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction. , 1992 .

[11]  Richard L. Cooley,et al.  Nonlinear‐regression groundwater flow modeling of a deep regional aquifer system , 1986 .

[12]  Richard L. Cooley,et al.  Regression modeling of ground-water flow , 1990 .

[13]  Richard L. Cooley,et al.  A method of estimating parameters and assessing reliability for models of steady state Groundwater flow: 2. Application of statistical analysis , 1979 .

[14]  Joel Massmann,et al.  Hydrogeological Decision Analysis: 1. A Framework , 1990 .

[15]  David W. Pollock,et al.  A Controlled Experiment in Ground Water Flow Model Calibration , 1998 .

[16]  George E. Backus,et al.  Bayesian inference in geomagnetism , 1988 .

[17]  G. P. Clarke,et al.  Approximate Confidence Limits for a Parameter Function in Nonlinear Regression , 1987 .

[18]  M. Marietta,et al.  Pilot Point Methodology for Automated Calibration of an Ensemble of conditionally Simulated Transmissivity Fields: 1. Theory and Computational Experiments , 1995 .

[19]  B. Sagar,et al.  Numerical modeling of parametric uncertainties in flow through porous media: development and initial testing of PORSTAT , 1983 .

[20]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques for use in performance assessment for radioactive waste disposal , 1993 .

[21]  Bryson C. Bates,et al.  Improved methodology for parameter inference in nonlinear, hydrologic regression models , 1992 .

[22]  J. Bahr,et al.  Consequences of spatial variability in aquifer properties and data limitations for groundwater modelling practice , 1988 .

[23]  Robert B. Schnabel,et al.  Computational experience with confidence intervals for nonlinear least squares , 1986 .

[24]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall‐runoff models , 1992 .