Incremental costs for reduction of air pollution from ships: a case study on North European emission control area

ABSTRACT In addition to sulphur oxides control, the North and the Baltic Seas have recently been designated as nitrogen oxides control area. Amidst ongoing developments in energy markets and international trade, shipowners have to develop cost-efficient strategies to comply with the new regulation. This study creates and tests a model calculating the incremental costs of abating NOx and SOx emissions under MARPOL Annex VI regulations for the following methods: SCR, HAM and internal engine modifications, marine gas oil, wet scrubbers, and liquefied natural gas propulsion. The model is tested empirically on a broad sample of 244 ships from the Swedish Commercial Fleet database for different operating contexts and fuel prices. Individual ship emission reductions and incremental abatement costs are calculated and the results are presented for the entire studied sample and per ship type class. The study also explores the sensitivity of the chosen abatement methods to cost determinants and to main engine time operation under the light of economic performance and cost-efficiency. The results of the study aim to contribute to company abatement strategy.

[1]  Hulda Winnes NOx controls for shipping in EU seas , 2016 .

[2]  Kevin Cullinane,et al.  The role of a cap-and-trade market in reducing NO x and SO x emissions: Prospects and benefits for ships within the Northern European ECA , 2013 .

[3]  Orestis Schinas,et al.  Selecting technologies towards compliance with MARPOL Annex VI: The perspective of operators , 2014 .

[4]  Kjetil Fagerholt,et al.  Concurrent design of vessel machinery system and air emission controls to meet future air emissions regulations , 2014 .

[5]  Mathias Magnusson NOx Abatement Technique for Marine Diesel Engines - Improved Marine SCR Systems , 2014 .

[6]  Orestis Schinas,et al.  Cost assessment of environmental regulation and options for marine operators , 2012 .

[7]  Seppo Niemi,et al.  Low emission engine technologies for future tier 3 legislations - options and case studies , 2016 .

[8]  Axel Lauer,et al.  Shipping contributes to ocean acidification , 2013 .

[9]  Wenming Shi,et al.  Themes and tools of maritime transport research during 2000-2014 , 2017 .

[10]  A. Jensen,et al.  Seaport strategies for pre-emptive defence of market share under changing hinterland transport system performance , 2013 .

[11]  Ian Jenkinson,et al.  Selection of techniques for reducing shipping NOx and SOx emissions , 2012 .

[12]  Kjetil Fagerholt,et al.  Optimized selection of vessel air emission controls—moving beyond cost-efficiency , 2015 .

[13]  Jacob Kronbak,et al.  The costs and benefits of sulphur reduction measures: Sulphur scrubbers versus marine gas oil , 2014 .

[14]  Erik Fridell,et al.  Particle Emissions from Ships: Dependence on Fuel Type , 2009, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[15]  Stein Ove Erikstad,et al.  A two-stage optimization approach for sulphur emission regulation compliance , 2017 .

[16]  Kosuke Imai,et al.  Survey Sampling , 1998, Nov/Dec 2017.

[17]  Hulda Winnes Air pollution from ships: emission measurements and impact assessments , 2010 .

[18]  A Jensen,et al.  COMBINED TRANSPORT. SYSTEMS, ECONOMICS AND STRATEGIES , 1990 .

[19]  M. Luo,et al.  Analyzing ship investment behaviour in liner shipping , 2013 .

[20]  Kjetil Fagerholt,et al.  Optimized selection of air emission controls for vessels , 2012 .

[21]  Johan Woxenius,et al.  Modelling modal choice effects of regulation on low-sulphur marine fuels in Northern Europe , 2014 .