Two types of dynamic quantum state secret sharing based on tensor networks states

Abstract A quantum network consists of multiple entanglement sources that distribute entangled quantum states to spatially dispersed nodes. This allows the quantum states in nodes to be processed locally. Tensors connected by a contraction can be regarded as tensor networks, in which quantum states are described by tensors. A tensor network state can also be expressed by a graph. Since the advent of quantum computing, people have paid more and more attention to the theory and application of tensor network states (TNS). In this paper, we study a connection between tensor networks states and dynamic quantum state secret sharing (QSS) based on the Affleck–Kennedy–Lieb–Tasaki (AKLT) model and parametric families of tensor network states. The ground state of the AKLT model is a simple quantum state in the form of the matrix product state (MPS), which is one of the well-known tensor network states. The parametric family of tensor network states is represented by the multiplication of some matrices and the tensor network states. The diversity of MPS representations, matrix factorization and matrix multiplication, and the simple graphical representation of TNS provide excellent tools for building new applications in the field of QSS and information security in quantum networks. Moreover, our QSS schemes are dynamic because many-body states used in our schemes are represented by the matrix product state (MPS) and parametric families of tensor network states respectively, which can be dynamically adjusted.

[1]  Xiao-Gang Wen,et al.  Tensor-Entanglement-Filtering Renormalization Approach and Symmetry Protected Topological Order , 2009, 0903.1069.

[2]  Shor,et al.  Simple proof of security of the BB84 quantum key distribution protocol , 2000, Physical review letters.

[3]  G. Chiribella,et al.  Quantum compression of tensor network states , 2019, New Journal of Physics.

[4]  G. Vidal Efficient classical simulation of slightly entangled quantum computations. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[5]  Zhen Zhang,et al.  Secret Sharing of a Quantum State. , 2016, Physical review letters.

[6]  Weiwei Guo,et al.  Tensor Learning for Regression , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[7]  Guifré Vidal Efficient simulation of one-dimensional quantum many-body systems. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[8]  P. Panigrahi,et al.  Quantum-information splitting using multipartite cluster states , 2008, 0802.0781.

[9]  Atul Kumar,et al.  Multiparty Quantum Communication Using Multiqubit Entanglement and Teleportation , 2013, 1303.6226.

[10]  D Porras,et al.  Density matrix renormalization group and periodic boundary conditions: a quantum information perspective. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[11]  Ping Fan,et al.  A novel dynamic quantum secret sharing in high-dimensional quantum system , 2021, Quantum Information Processing.

[12]  Chia-Wei Tsai,et al.  Efficient and secure dynamic quantum secret sharing protocol based on bell states , 2020, Quantum Inf. Process..

[13]  Di Ma,et al.  Practical source-independent quantum random number generation with detector efficiency mismatch , 2020, Quantum Information Processing.

[14]  Kennedy,et al.  Rigorous results on valence-bond ground states in antiferromagnets. , 1987, Physical review letters.

[15]  Mehmet A. Orgun,et al.  A Quantum Secret Sharing Scheme Using Orbital Angular Momentum onto Multiple Spin States Based on Fibonacci Compression Encoding , 2018, Communications in Theoretical Physics.

[16]  Chun-Wei Yang,et al.  Dynamic quantum secret sharing protocol based on GHZ state , 2014, Quantum Inf. Process..

[17]  Jian-Wei Pan,et al.  Efficient multiparty quantum-secret-sharing schemes , 2004, quant-ph/0405179.

[18]  D. Gottesman Theory of quantum secret sharing , 1999, quant-ph/9910067.

[19]  Barry C. Sanders,et al.  Relativistic (2,3)-threshold quantum secret sharing , 2017 .

[20]  L. Hsu Quantum secret-sharing protocol based on Grover's algorithm , 2003 .

[21]  J. Chen,et al.  Equivalence of restricted Boltzmann machines and tensor network states , 2017, 1701.04831.

[22]  Chia-Wei Tsai,et al.  Dynamic quantum secret sharing , 2013, Quantum Inf. Process..

[23]  Huawang Qin,et al.  Multi-dimensional quantum state sharing based on quantum Fourier transform , 2018, Quantum Inf. Process..

[24]  Tian-Yin Wang,et al.  Analysis of efficient and secure dynamic quantum secret sharing protocol based on Bell states , 2021, Quantum Inf. Process..

[25]  Huawang Qin,et al.  Dynamic quantum secret sharing by using d-dimensional GHZ state , 2017, Quantum Inf. Process..

[26]  L. Hsu,et al.  Quantum secret sharing using product states , 2005 .

[27]  Antonio Acin,et al.  Connector Tensor Networks: A Renormalization-Type Approach to Quantum Certification , 2019, 1907.09744.

[28]  W. Bowen,et al.  Tripartite quantum state sharing. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[29]  Kun Zhang,et al.  Entanglement versus Bell nonlocality of quantum nonequilibrium steady states , 2021, Quantum Inf. Process..

[30]  Changde Xie,et al.  Quantum Secret Sharing Among Four Players Using Multipartite Bound Entanglement of an Optical Field. , 2018, Physical review letters.

[31]  J I Cirac,et al.  Classical simulation of infinite-size quantum lattice systems in two spatial dimensions. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[32]  Ming-Ming Wang,et al.  An asymmetric dynamic multiparty quantum secret sharing against active attacks , 2020 .

[33]  Kui Hou,et al.  Quantum state sharing with a genuinely entangled five-qubit state and Bell-state measurements , 2010 .

[34]  Lei Wang,et al.  Tree Tensor Networks for Generative Modeling , 2019, Physical Review B.

[35]  G. Evenbly,et al.  Entanglement renormalization in two spatial dimensions. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[36]  U. Schollwoeck The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states , 2010, 1008.3477.

[37]  A. Forbes,et al.  Experimental Demonstration of 11‐Dimensional 10‐Party Quantum Secret Sharing , 2020, Laser & Photonics Reviews.

[38]  J. Ignacio Cirac,et al.  Normal projected entangled pair states generating the same state , 2018, New Journal of Physics.

[39]  E. Miles Stoudenmire,et al.  Learning relevant features of data with multi-scale tensor networks , 2017, ArXiv.

[40]  Fei Gao,et al.  Perfect quantum multiple-unicast network coding protocol , 2017, Quantum Information Processing.

[41]  Ting Gao,et al.  Addendum to "Quantum secret sharing between multiparty and multiparty without entanglement" , 2005 .