An experimental evaluation of a loop versus a reference design for two-channel microarrays

MOTIVATION Despite theoretical arguments that so-called 'loop designs' for two-channel DNA microarray experiments are more efficient, biologists continue to use 'reference designs'. We describe two sets of microarray experiments with RNA from two different biological systems (TPA-stimulated mammalian cells and Streptomyces coelicolor). In each case, both a loop and a reference design were used with the same RNA preparations with the aim of studying their relative efficiency. RESULTS The results of these experiments show that (1) the loop design attains a much higher precision than the reference design, (2) multiplicative spot effects are a large source of variability, and if they are not accounted for in the mathematical model, for example, by taking log-ratios or including spot effects, then the model will perform poorly. The first result is reinforced by a simulation study. Practical recommendations are given on how simple loop designs can be extended to more realistic experimental designs and how standard statistical methods allow the experimentalist to use and interpret the results from loop designs in practice. AVAILABILITY The data and R code are available at http://exgen.ma.umist.ac.uk CONTACT veronica.vinciotti@brunel.ac.uk.

[1]  John W. Sammon,et al.  A Nonlinear Mapping for Data Structure Analysis , 1969, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[2]  Gary A. Churchill,et al.  Analysis of Variance for Gene Expression Microarray Data , 2000, J. Comput. Biol..

[3]  T. Speed,et al.  Design issues for cDNA microarray experiments , 2002, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[4]  G. Churchill Fundamentals of experimental design for cDNA microarrays , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[5]  D. Hartl,et al.  Bayesian analysis of gene expression levels: statistical quantification of relative mRNA level across multiple strains or treatments , 2002, Genome Biology.

[6]  D. Hartl,et al.  Population genetic variation in genome-wide gene expression. , 2003, Molecular biology and evolution.

[7]  Ash A. Alizadeh,et al.  Gene Expression Signature of Fibroblast Serum Response Predicts Human Cancer Progression: Similarities between Tumors and Wounds , 2004, PLoS biology.

[8]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Gene expression profiling identifies clinically relevant subtypes of prostate cancer. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  R. Khanin,et al.  Simulated annealing for near-optimal dual-channel microarray designs , 2004 .

[10]  G F V Glonek,et al.  Factorial and time course designs for cDNA microarray experiments. , 2004, Biostatistics.

[11]  Ash A. Alizadeh,et al.  Role of interleukin 6 in myocardial dysfunction of meningococcal septic shock , 2004, The Lancet.

[12]  Ernst Wit,et al.  Statistics for Microarrays : Design, Analysis and Inference , 2004 .

[13]  Raya Khanin,et al.  Design of Large Time-Course Microarray Experiments with Two Channels , 2005, Applied bioinformatics.

[14]  Edgar Brunner,et al.  Efficient design and analysis of two colour factorial microarray experiments , 2006, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[15]  G. Churchill,et al.  Statistical design and the analysis of gene expression microarray data. , 2007, Genetical research.