Performing perception—staging aesthetics of interaction

In interaction design for experience-oriented uses of technology, a central facet of aesthetics of interaction is rooted in the user's experience of herself “performing her perception.” By drawing on performance (theater) theory, phenomenology and sociology and with references to recent HCI-work on the relation between the system and the performer/user and the spectator's relation to this dynamic, we show how the user is simultaneously operator, performer and spectator when interacting. By engaging with the system, she continuously acts out these three roles and her awareness of them is crucial in her experience. We argue that this 3-in-1 is always already shaping the user's understanding and perception of her interaction as it is staged through her experience of the object's form and expression. Through examples ranging from everyday technologies utilizing performances of interaction to spatial contemporary artworks, digital as well as analogue, we address the notion of the performative spectator and the spectating performer. We demonstrate how perception is also performative and how focus on this aspect seems to be crucial when designing experience-oriented products, systems and services.

[1]  Eric Bentley,et al.  The Life of the Drama , 1964 .

[2]  J. Orr.  Sharing knowledge, celebrating identity: Community memory in a service culture. , 1990 .

[3]  Jonathan Price,et al.  Life-Show: How to See Theater in Life and Life in Theater , 1973 .

[4]  Patrick Shannon.  A Private Public , 2008 .

[5]  Jin Moen,et al.  Towards people based movement interaction and kinaesthetic interaction experiences , 2005, Critical Computing.

[6]  Giulio Jacucci,et al.  A manifesto for the performative development of ubiquitous media , 2005, Critical Computing.

[7]  Steve Benford,et al.  The Frame of the Game: Blurring the Boundary between Fiction and Reality in Mobile Experiences , 2006, CHI 2006.

[8]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces , 1992, CSCW '92.

[9]  Espen Aarseth.  Cybertext: Perspectives on Ergodic Literature , 1997 .

[10]  Edward E. Jones,et al.  Life as theater: A dramaturgical sourcebook. , 1975 .

[11]  E. Goffman.  Behavior in public places : notes on the social organization of gatherings , 1964 .

[12]  Lucy Suchman.  Plans and situated actions: the problem of human-machine communication , 1987 .

[13]  Victoria Bellotti,et al.  Walking away from the desktop computer: distributed collaboration and mobility in a product design team , 1996, CSCW '96.

[14]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Seeking a Foundation for Context-Aware Computing , 2001, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[15]  E. Goffman.  The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life , 1959 .

[16]  A. Paul Hare,et al.  Dramaturgical analysis of social interaction , 1965 .

[17]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  The computer reaches out: the historical continuity of interface design , 1989, CHI '90.

[18]  Johan Redström,et al.  Slow Technology – Designing for Reflection , 2001, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[19]  Steve Benford,et al.  Designing the spectator experience , 2005, CHI.

[20]  Ged M. Murtagh,et al.  Seeing the rules: preliminary observations of action, interaction and mobile phone use , 2001 .

[21]  L. Suchman.  Plans and situated actions , 1987 .

[22]  Brenda Laurel,et al.  Computers as theatre , 1991 .

[23]  K. Gegenfurtner,et al.  Design Issues in Gaze Guidance Under review with ACM Transactions on Computer Human Interaction , 2009 .

[24]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  Tangible bits: towards seamless interfaces between people, bits and atoms , 1997, CHI.

[25]  Jodi Forlizzi,et al.  Understanding experience in interactive systems , 2004, DIS '04.

[26]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Where the action is , 2001 .

[27]  Paul Dourish,et al.  On "Technomethodology": Foundational Relationships Between Ethnomethodology and System Design , 1998, Hum. Comput. Interact..