Image quality assessment based on a degradation model

We model a degraded image as an original image that has been subject to linear frequency distortion and additive noise injection. Since the psychovisual effects of frequency distortion and noise injection are independent, we decouple these two sources of degradation and measure their effect on the human visual system. We develop a distortion measure (DM) of the effect of frequency distortion, and a noise quality measure (NQM) of the effect of additive noise. The NQM, which is based on Peli's (1990) contrast pyramid, takes into account the following: 1) variation in contrast sensitivity with distance, image dimensions, and spatial frequency; 2) variation in the local luminance mean; 3) contrast interaction between spatial frequencies; 4) contrast masking effects. For additive noise, we demonstrate that the nonlinear NQM is a better measure of visual quality than peak signal-to noise ratio (PSNR) and linear quality measures. We compute the DM in three steps. First, we find the frequency distortion in the degraded image. Second, we compute the deviation of this frequency distortion from an allpass response of unity gain (no distortion). Finally, we weight the deviation by a model of the frequency response of the human visual system and integrate over the visible frequencies. We demonstrate how to decouple distortion and additive noise degradation in a practical image restoration system.

[1]  Theophano Mitsa Image quality metrics for halftone images , 1992, Other Conferences.

[2]  E Peli,et al.  Contrast sensitivity to patch stimuli: effects of spatial bandwidth and temporal presentation. , 1993, Spatial vision.

[3]  R. Haber,et al.  Visual Perception , 2018, Encyclopedia of Database Systems.

[4]  Albert A. Michelson,et al.  Studies in Optics , 1995 .

[5]  J Nachmias,et al.  Letter: Grating contrast: discrimination may be better than detection. , 1974, Vision research.

[6]  Theophano Mitsa,et al.  Evaluation of contrast sensitivity functions for the formulation of quality measures incorporated in halftoning algorithms , 1993, 1993 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[7]  D. Badcock Spatial phase or luminance profile discrimination? , 1984, Vision Research.

[8]  Richard H. Williams,et al.  Electrical Engineering Probability , 1991 .

[9]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Design and quality assessment of forward and inverse error diffusion halftoning algorithms , 1998 .

[10]  Arthur P Ginsburg,et al.  Visual Information Processing Based on Spatial Filters Constrained by Biological Data. , 1978 .

[11]  David J. Sakrison,et al.  The effects of a visual fidelity criterion of the encoding of images , 1974, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[12]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Digital halftoning as 2-D delta-sigma modulation , 1997, Proceedings of International Conference on Image Processing.

[13]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  A comparison of contrast detection and discrimination , 1986, Vision Research.

[14]  Scott J. Daly,et al.  Visible differences predictor: an algorithm for the assessment of image fidelity , 1992, Electronic Imaging.

[15]  Robert Ulichney,et al.  Digital Halftoning , 1987 .

[16]  Peter G. J. Barten,et al.  Evaluation of Subjective Image Quality with the Square Root Integral Method , 1990, Applied Vision.

[17]  E. Peli Contrast in complex images. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[18]  R. Hess,et al.  Contrast-coding in amblyopia. I. Differences in the neural basis of human amblyopia , 1983, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[19]  Patrick C. Teo,et al.  Perceptual image distortion , 1994, Proceedings of 1st International Conference on Image Processing.

[20]  J P Thomas,et al.  Independent processing of suprathreshold spatial gratings as a function of their separation in spatial frequency. , 1989, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[21]  Jeffrey Lubin,et al.  A VISUAL DISCRIMINATION MODEL FOR IMAGING SYSTEM DESIGN AND EVALUATION , 1995 .

[22]  Niranjan Damera-Venkata,et al.  A high quality, fast inverse halftoning algorithm for error diffused halftones , 1998, Proceedings 1998 International Conference on Image Processing. ICIP98 (Cat. No.98CB36269).

[23]  Patrick C. Teo,et al.  A model of perceptual image fidelity , 1995, Proceedings., International Conference on Image Processing.

[24]  Theophano Mitsa,et al.  Frequency-channel-based visual models as quantitative quality measures in halftoning , 1993, Electronic Imaging.

[25]  R. F. Hess,et al.  Evidence for spatially local computations underlying discrimination of periodic patterns in fovea and periphery , 1987, Vision Research.

[26]  Qian Lin Halftone image quality analysis based on a human vision model , 1993, Electronic Imaging.

[27]  RussLL L. Ds Vnlos,et al.  SPATIAL FREQUENCY SELECTIVITY OF CELLS IN MACAQUE VISUAL CORTEX , 2022 .