A Novel Mutual-Information-Guided Sparse Feature Selection Approach for Epilepsy Diagnosis Using Interictal EEG Signals

Diagnosing people with possible epilepsy has major implications for their health, occupation, driving and social interactions. The current epilepsy diagnosis procedure is often subject to errors with considerable interobserver variations by manually observing long-term lengthy EEG recordings that require the presence of seizure (ictal) activities. It is costly and often difficult to obtain long-term EEG data with seizure activities that imped epilepsy diagnosis for many people, in particular in areas that lack of medical resources and well-trained neurologists. There is a desperate need for a new diagnostic tool that is capable of providing quick and accurate epilepsy-screening using short-term interictal EEG signals. However, it is challenging to analyze interictal EEG recordings when patients behaviors same as normal subjects. This research is dedicated to develop new automatic data-driven pattern recognition system for interictal EEG signals and design a quick screening process to help neurologists diagnose patients with epilepsy. In particular, we propose a novel information-theory-guided spare feature selection framework to select the most important EEG features to discriminate epileptic or non-epileptic EEG patterns accurately. The proposed approach were tested on an EEG dataset with 11 patients and 11 normal subjects, achieved an impressive diagnostic accuracy of 90 % based on visually-evoked potentials in a human-computer task. This preliminary study indicates that it is promising to provide fast, reliable, and affordable epilepsy diagnostic solutions using short-term interictal EEG signals.

[1]  A. Cichocki,et al.  Steady-state visually evoked potentials: Focus on essential paradigms and future perspectives , 2010, Progress in Neurobiology.

[2]  Pedro Larrañaga,et al.  A review of feature selection techniques in bioinformatics , 2007, Bioinform..

[3]  A. Wilkins,et al.  A neurological basis for visual discomfort. , 1984, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[4]  R. Tibshirani Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso , 1996 .

[5]  Mark A. Hall,et al.  Correlation-based Feature Selection for Machine Learning , 2003 .

[6]  Reinhold Scherer,et al.  Steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP)-based communication: impact of harmonic frequency components , 2005, Journal of neural engineering.

[7]  Huan Liu,et al.  Efficient Feature Selection via Analysis of Relevance and Redundancy , 2004, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[8]  S. Smith EEG in the diagnosis, classification, and management of patients with epilepsy , 2005, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[9]  John Fox,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis and Generalized Linear Models , 2008 .

[10]  C. V. van Donselaar,et al.  How Confident Are We of the Diagnosis of Epilepsy? , 2006, Epilepsia.

[11]  L Forsgren,et al.  Prospective Incidence Study and Clinical Characterization of Seizures in Newly Referred Adults , 1990, Epilepsia.

[12]  Josef Kittler,et al.  Floating search methods in feature selection , 1994, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[13]  Masaaki Nishida,et al.  Differential visually-induced gamma-oscillations in human cerebral cortex , 2009, NeuroImage.

[14]  N. Draper,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis: Draper/Applied Regression Analysis , 1998 .

[15]  D. Regan Human brain electrophysiology: Evoked potentials and evoked magnetic fields in science and medicine , 1989 .

[16]  Fuhui Long,et al.  Feature selection based on mutual information criteria of max-dependency, max-relevance, and min-redundancy , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[17]  E. Perucca,et al.  Treatment of Status Epilepticus in Adults: Guidelines of the Italian League Against Epilepsy , 2006, Epilepsia.