Do demographic factors matter in university-industry knowledge exchange? A study based on Sri Lankan university system

Purpose This study aims to identify the effect of demographic factors on the relationship between academic contribution and university–industry knowledge exchange in Sri Lanka. Design/methodology/approach This study is of quantitative and explanatory type , which applied the deductive research method, and is conducted with minimum interference of researcher taking individual academics as the unit of analysis. The study collected data from 178 academics randomly through a structured questionnaire designed to analyze through statistical package for the social sciences and analysis of a moment structure statistical software. A structural equation model is applied to collected data to explore the moderating impact of the demographic factor on the university–industry knowledge exchange. Findings Overall involvement of academic staff in joint research, contract research, human resource mobility and the training with industry were was low in Sri Lanka. However, all four independent variables significantly associated with the knowledge exchange process from which only joint research and training had a statistically significant effect on university–industry knowledge exchange . Concerning demographic factors, only the quality of academic research significantly moderated the relationship between academic contribution and university–industry knowledge exchange process in Sri Lanka. Research limitations/implications This study considered only the university side of the university–industry knowledge exchange process. Practical implications This paper implies that gender, age and area of specialization did not have significant power to moderate the relationship between academic contribution and university–industry knowledge exchange process. Originality/value There is a lack of research literature discussing the moderating effect of demographic factors on the university–industry knowledge exchange process. In Sri Lanka, money and commercial benefits that received through industry partnerships had not been valued by academics. The majority considered the connection with industry and exchange knowledge as a responsibility that they should perform in return to free education received from grade one to graduation.

[1]  D. Urbano,et al.  Academics’ start-up intentions and knowledge filters: an individual perspective of the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship , 2013 .

[2]  Scott Shane,et al.  Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others? , 2003 .

[3]  John Garrick,et al.  University-industry partnerships: Implications for industrial training, opportunities for new knowledge , 2004 .

[4]  Mario Calderini,et al.  Academic research, technological specialization and the innovation performance in European regions: an empirical analysis in the wireless sector , 2005 .

[5]  A. Geuna,et al.  The Governance of University Knowledge Transfer: A Critical Review of the Literature , 2009 .

[6]  S. Ankrah,et al.  Universities-Industry Collaboration: A Systematic Review , 2015 .

[7]  E. Baraldi,et al.  Controlling the commercialisation of science across inter-organisational borders: Four cases from two major Swedish universities , 2014 .

[8]  Chris Forman,et al.  Digital technology adoption and knowledge flows within firms: Can the Internet overcome geographic and technological distance? , 2019, Research Policy.

[9]  E. Giuliani,et al.  Who are the researchers that are collaborating with industry? An analysis of the wine sectors in Chile, South Africa and Italy , 2010 .

[10]  Ammon Salter,et al.  The engagement gap:: Exploring gender differences in University – Industry collaboration activities , 2015 .

[11]  J. Howells,et al.  Universities in an open innovation system: A UK perspective , 2012 .

[12]  D. Gann,et al.  How open is innovation , 2010 .

[13]  E. Mansfield.  Academic research and industrial innovation: An update of empirical findings1 , 1998 .

[14]  Joanna Poyago-Theotoky,et al.  Universities and Fundamental Research: Reflections on the Growth of University–Industry Partnerships , 2002 .

[15]  A. Scandura.  University–industry collaboration and firms’ R&D effort , 2016 .

[16]  Antonio Padilla-Meléndez,et al.  Open innovation in universities: What motivates researchers to engage in knowledge transfer exchanges? , 2012 .

[17]  Nickolaos G. Tzeremes,et al.  The interconnections of academic research and universities’ “third mission”: Evidence from the UK , 2019, Research Policy.

[18]  Rna Rudi Bekkers,et al.  Analysing knowledge transfer channels between universities and industry: To what degree do sectors also matter? , 2008 .

[19]  P. Boardman,et al.  University researchers working with private companies , 2009 .

[20]  W. Dolfsma,et al.  Knowledge transfer in university–industry research partnerships: a review , 2018, The Journal of Technology Transfer.

[21]  A. Sengupta,et al.  University Research and Knowledge Transfer: A Dynamic View of Ambidexterity in British Universities , 2017 .

[22]  H. Chesbrough.  Open Innovation: Where We've Been and Where We're Going , 2012 .

[23]  M. Belitski,et al.  Commercializing university research in transition economies: Technology transfer offices or direct industrial funding? , 2019, Research Policy.

[24]  Jennifer A. Chatman,et al.  The Influence of Demographic Heterogeneity on the Emergence and Consequences of Cooperative Norms in Work Teams , 2001 .

[25]  N. Cohen,et al.  Open innovation networks between academia and industry: an imperative for breakthrough therapies , 2009, Nature Medicine.

[26]  N. Lockett,et al.  Recognising “open innovation” in HEI‐industry interaction for knowledge transfer and exchange , 2009 .

[27]  Sang M. Lee,et al.  Open innovation in the public sector of leading countries , 2012 .

[28]  M. Kondo.  University‐industry collaboration in Japan by technology fields , 2011 .

[29]  A. Link,et al.  An Empirical Analysis of the Propensity of Academics to Engage In Informal University Technology Transfer , 2007 .

[30]  Maryann Feldman,et al.  Academic Entrepreneurs: Organizational Change at the Individual Level , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[31]  Pablo D'Este,et al.  University-industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? , 2007 .

[32]  Todd R. Zenger,et al.  Organizational Demography: The Differential Effects of Age and Tenure Distributions on Technical Communication , 1989 .

[33]  Edwin Mansfield,et al.  Academic research and industrial innovation , 1991 .

[34]  Michele Grimaldi,et al.  Knowledge-based inter-organizational collaborations , 2010, J. Knowl. Manag..

[35]  M. Perkmann,et al.  University Industry Relationships and Open Innovation: Towards a Research Agenda , 2007 .

[36]  F. Yammarino,et al.  Multi-level issues in social systems , 2006 .

[37]  M. Fischer,et al.  Knowledge interactions between universities and industry in Austria: sectoral patterns and determinants , 2002 .

[38]  Y. Lee.  The Sustainability of University-Industry Research Collaboration: An Empirical Assessment , 2000 .

[39]  D Blumenthal,et al.  Participation of life-science faculty in research relationships with industry. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[40]  Andreas Pyka,et al.  A new model for university-industry links in knowledge-based economies , 2011 .

[41]  Andrea Pozzali,et al.  The effects of cognitive distance in university-industry collaborations: some evidence from Italian universities , 2013 .

[42]  F. Buttel,et al.  Gender and Agricultural Science: Evidence From Two Surveys of Land‐Grant Scientists* , 2009 .

[43]  Thierry Rayna,et al.  University-Industry Knowledge Exchange: An Exploratory Study of Open Innovation in UK Universities , 2015 .

[44]  E. Baraldi,et al.  Targeting Academic Engagement in Open Innovation: Tools, Effects and Challenges for University Management , 2015 .

[45]  A. G. Balogun.  Demographic Variables predicting Employees Willingness to share Tacit Knowledge in Service Occupations , 2014 .

[46]  R. Keast,et al.  Australia's Cooperative Research Centre Program: A transaction cost theory perspective , 2016 .

[47]  Joanne Roberts,et al.  University-Industry Collaboration: A CoPs Approach to KTPs , 2011, J. Knowl. Manag..

[48]  Amalya L. Oliver.  On the duality of competition and collaboration: network-based knowledge relations in the biotechnology industry , 2004 .

[49]  C. Adair,et al.  Knowledge transfer and exchange: review and synthesis of the literature. , 2007, The Milbank quarterly.

[50]  Joaquín M. Azagra-Caro,et al.  Faculty support for the objectives of university–industry relations versus degree of R&D cooperation: The importance of regional absorptive capacity , 2006 .

[51]  A. Salter,et al.  Academic Engagement and Commercialisation: A Review of the Literature on University-Industry Relations , 2012 .

[52]  P. Murray,et al.  Innovation strategies for successful commercialisation in public universities , 2017 .

[53]  Giuseppina Passiante,et al.  Knowledge transfer in open innovation , 2018, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[54]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  Researchers’ Industry Experience and Productivity in University–Industry Research Centers: A “Scientific and Technical Human Capital” Explanation , 2006 .

[55]  Christoph Grimpe,et al.  Informal university technology transfer: a comparison between the United States and Germany , 2010 .

[56]  Arvids A. Ziedonis,et al.  Markets versus Spillovers in Outflows of University Research , 2014 .

[57]  A. Salter,et al.  Cambridge Centre for Business Research National Survey of Knowledge Exchange Activity by United Kingdom Academics, 2012-2015 , 2017 .

[58]  Charles-Clemens Rüling,et al.  Research collaboration in Large Scale Research Infrastructures: Collaboration types and policy implications , 2019, Research Policy.

[59]  M. Balconi,et al.  University–industry interactions in applied research: The case of microelectronics , 2006 .