Adaptation to Natural Binocular Disparities in Primate V1 Explained by a Generalized Energy Model

Sensory processing in the brain is thought to have evolved to encode naturally occurring stimuli efficiently. We report an adaptation in binocular cortical neurons that reflects the tight constraints imposed by the geometry of 3D vision. We show that the widely used binocular energy model predicts that neurons dedicate part of their dynamic range to impossible combinations of left and right images. Approximately 42% of the neurons we record from V1 of awake monkeys behave in this way (a powerful confirmation of the model), while about 58% deviate from the model in a manner that concentrates more of their dynamic range on stimuli that obey the constraints of binocular geometry. We propose a simple extension of the energy model, using multiple subunits, that explains the adaptation we observe, as well as other properties of binocular neurons that have been hard to account for, such as the response to anti-correlated stereograms.

[1]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  The binocular organization of complex cells in the cat's visual cortex. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  The binocular organization of simple cells in the cat's visual cortex. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  L K Cormack,et al.  Disparity-tuned channels of the human visual system , 1993, Visual Neuroscience.

[4]  Gregory C. DeAngelis,et al.  Depth is encoded in the visual cortex by a specialized receptive field structure , 1991, Nature.

[5]  D. Snodderly,et al.  Spatial organization of receptive fields of V1 neurons of alert monkeys: comparison with responses to gratings. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  G. Poggio,et al.  Stereoscopic mechanisms in monkey visual cortex: binocular correlation and disparity selectivity , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[7]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Natural image statistics and neural representation. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[8]  Bruce G Cumming,et al.  Ocular dominance predicts neither strength nor class of disparity selectivity with random-dot stimuli in primate V1. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  D. Ringach,et al.  Dynamics of Spatial Frequency Tuning in Macaque V1 , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Neural mechanisms for encoding binocular disparity: receptive field position versus phase. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  G. Poggio,et al.  Binocular interaction and depth sensitivity in striate and prestriate cortex of behaving rhesus monkey. , 1977, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  Michael S. Lewicki,et al.  Efficient auditory coding , 2006, Nature.

[13]  G C DeAngelis,et al.  The physiology of stereopsis. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[14]  A. Parker,et al.  Range and mechanism of encoding of horizontal disparity in macaque V1. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Encoding of binocular disparity by complex cells in the cat's visual cortex. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  BsnNr C. Srorn,et al.  CLASSIFYING SIMPLE AND COMPLEX CELLS ON THE BASIS OF RESPONSE MODULATION , 2002 .

[17]  Chuan Yi Tang,et al.  A 2.|E|-Bit Distributed Algorithm for the Directed Euler Trail Problem , 1993, Inf. Process. Lett..

[18]  E H Adelson,et al.  Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[19]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Stereoscopic depth discrimination in the visual cortex: neurons ideally suited as disparity detectors. , 1990, Science.

[20]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Neural mechanisms for processing binocular information II. Complex cells. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  Bruce G Cumming,et al.  Sensors for impossible stimuli may solve the stereo correspondence problem , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[22]  S. Levay,et al.  Ocular dominance and disparity coding in cat visual cortex , 1988, Visual Neuroscience.

[23]  David J. Fleet,et al.  Neural encoding of binocular disparity: Energy models, position shifts and phase shifts , 1996, Vision Research.

[24]  Gian F. Poggio,et al.  Mechanisms of stereopsis in monkey visual cortex , 1979, Trends in Neurosciences.

[25]  Feng Qi Han,et al.  Cortical Sensitivity to Visual Features in Natural Scenes , 2005, PLoS biology.

[26]  H. Wagner,et al.  Horizontal-disparity tuning of neurons in the visual forebrain of the behaving barn owl. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  Bruce G Cumming,et al.  Measuring V1 receptive fields despite eye movements in awake monkeys. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Neural mechanisms for processing binocular information I. Simple cells. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  F. Attneave Some informational aspects of visual perception. , 1954, Psychological review.

[30]  H. Wagner,et al.  A threshold explains modulation of neural responses to opposite-contrast stereograms , 2001, Neuroreport.

[31]  B. G. Cumming,et al.  Responses of primary visual cortical neurons to binocular disparity without depth perception , 1997, Nature.

[32]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Spatiotemporal Elements of Macaque V1 Receptive Fields , 2005, Neuron.

[33]  N. Qian Binocular Disparity and the Perception of Depth , 1997, Neuron.

[34]  Bruce G. Cumming,et al.  Understanding the Cortical Specialization for Horizontal Disparity , 2004, Neural Computation.

[35]  H. Wagner,et al.  Hierarchical Processing of Horizontal Disparity Information in the Visual Forebrain of Behaving Owls , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  C. Blakemore,et al.  The neural mechanism of binocular depth discrimination , 1967, The Journal of physiology.

[37]  E J Chichilnisky,et al.  A simple white noise analysis of neuronal light responses , 2001, Network.

[38]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  On the neurophysiological organization of binocular vision , 1990, Vision Research.

[39]  Hermann Wagner,et al.  Disparity-sensitive cells in the owl have a characteristic disparity , 1993, Nature.

[40]  Y. Chino,et al.  Binocular spatial phase tuning characteristics of neurons in the macaque striate cortex. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[41]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[42]  B. G. Cumming,et al.  An unexpected specialization for horizontal disparity in primate primary visual cortex , 2002, Nature.

[43]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Natural signal statistics and sensory gain control , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[44]  C. Blakemore,et al.  Stereoscopic Depth Aftereffect Produced without Monocular Cues , 1971, Science.

[45]  William Bialek,et al.  Real-time performance of a movement-sensitive neuron in the blowfly visual system: coding and information transfer in short spike sequences , 1988, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[46]  Bruce G Cumming,et al.  A simple model accounts for the response of disparity-tuned V1 neurons to anticorrelated images , 2002, Visual Neuroscience.

[47]  D J Field,et al.  Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[48]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Analysis of retinal correspondence by studying receptive fields of rinocular single units in cat striate cortex , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.