ASTM F48 Formation and Standards for Industrial Exoskeletons and Exosuits

OCCUPATIONAL APPLICATIONS This paper provides an overview of a new consensus standards committee for exoskeletons, ASTM International F48, and describes the organization and current activities of this committee. Lack of product standards and certifications have been described as barriers to adoption of exoskeleton technologies in industry practice. While exoskeletons are not considered a traditional form of personal protective equipment (PPE), they are similarly wearable, and much of the interest in their application in the industrial/workplace domain is motivated by injury prevention. ASTM F48 believes that standards and certifications for exoskeletons in their manufacture, deployment, and use would enhance their adoption and effective application in the workplace.

[1]  E. A. Darling.  The Effects of Training , 2010 .

[2]  Zachary J. Lemnios.  Statement Testimony of The Honorable Zachary J. Lemnios Director, Defense Research and Engineering Before the United States House of Representatives Committee on Armed Services Subcommittee on Terrorism, Unconventional Threats and Capabilities , 2010 .

[3]  Chang-Soo Han,et al.  The technical trend of the exoskeleton robot system for human power assistance , 2012 .

[4]  Gurvinder S. Virk,et al.  ISO 13482 - The new safety standard for personal care robots , 2014, ISR 2014.

[5]  Marcel P Dijkers,et al.  Time and Effort Required by Persons with Spinal Cord Injury to Learn to Use a Powered Exoskeleton for Assisted Walking. , 2015, Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation.

[6]  Frank Krause,et al.  Exoskeletons for industrial application and their potential effects on physical work load , 2016, Ergonomics.

[7]  Katharina Raab,et al.  Effects of training with the ReWalk exoskeleton on quality of life in incomplete spinal cord injury: a single case study , 2016, Spinal Cord Series and Cases.

[8]  Maria Pia Cavatorta,et al.  Investigation into the applicability of a passive upper-limb exoskeleton in automotive industry , 2017 .

[9]  Michelle Fabian,et al.  Feasibility and Safety of a Powered Exoskeleton for Assisted Walking for Persons With Multiple Sclerosis: A Single-Group Preliminary Study. , 2017, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[10]  Roger V. Bostelman,et al.  Test methods for exoskeletons—lessons learned from industrial and response robotics , 2018 .

[11]  Eiichi Yoshida,et al.  Standard Performance Test of Wearable Robots for Lumbar Support , 2018, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters.

[12]  Marty Smets,et al.  A Field Evaluation of Arm-Support Exoskeletons for Overhead Work Applications in Automotive Assembly , 2019, IISE Transactions on Occupational Ergonomics and Human Factors.

[13]  Neil J. Mitchell.  Time and Effort , 2021 .