Repeatability and Validity of the PowerRefractor and the Nidek AR600-A in an Adult Population with Healthy Eyes

We assessed the repeatability and validity of the PowerRefractor and the Nidek AR-600A autorefractor. This is the first independent study conducted on adults to evaluate the performance of these instruments in a laboratory setting. Fifty subjects (23 males and 27 females) aged 16 to 61 years (mean, 37 ± 12) participated in the study. The validity of the PowerRefractor and the Nidek autorefractor readings were determined by comparing them to subjective refraction. Measurements of refractive error were obtained from the two instruments on two separate occasions to assess their repeatability. The measured refractive error was converted into a dioptric power matrix for data analysis. No significant difference was found between the measurements obtained with the two instruments and the subjective refraction. The estimate of refractive error given by the two instruments was also found to be repeatable. In addition to measuring the refractive error, the PowerRefractor also offers the facility to measure eye position, pupil size, and dynamics of accommodation. We suggest some improvements to the PowerRefractor measurement technique to standardize its clinical use and to improve accuracy.

[1]  J Wattam-Bell,et al.  Measurement of Astigmatism by Automated Infrared Photoretinoscopy , 1997, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[2]  J Reimer Wolter,et al.  System of Ophthalmology, Vol. IV: The Physiology of the Eye and of Vision , 1970 .

[3]  M P Keating,et al.  An easier method to obtain the sphere, cylinder, and axis from an off-axis dioptric power matrix. , 1980, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[4]  D. Humphriss,et al.  Refraction by immediate contrast. , 1962, The Optometric weekly.

[5]  C. Bisantis,et al.  The binocular videorefractoscope for visual screening in infancy. , 1993, German journal of ophthalmology.

[6]  T. Simpson,et al.  Repeatability and Accuracy of Automated Refraction: A Comparison of the Nikon NRK-8000, the Nidek AR-1000, and Subjective Refraction , 1997, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[7]  G. W. Santos.  Clinical Procedures in Optometry , 1992 .

[8]  ALIZA M THOMPSON,et al.  Accuracy and Precision of the Tomey ViVA Infrared Photorefractor , 1996, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[9]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[10]  A. Beckett,et al.  AKUFO AND IBARAPA. , 1965, Lancet.

[11]  M. P. Keating.  Dioptric Power in an Off‐Axis Meridian: The Torsional Component , 1986, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[12]  F. Schaeffel,et al.  Inter‐individual variability in the dynamics of natural accommodation in humans: relation to age and refractive errors. , 1993, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  W F Long,et al.  A Matrix Formalism for Decentration Problems* , 1976, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[14]  H C Howland,et al.  Laboratory, Clinical, and Kindergarten Test of a New Eccentric Infrared Photorefractor (PowerRefractor) , 2000, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[15]  W. F. Harris.  Simplified rational representation of dioptric power , 1989, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.