Validation of an alignment method using motion tracking system for in-vitro orientation of cadaveric hip joints with reduced set of anatomical landmarks.

Accurate in-vitro orientation of cadaveric hip joints is challenging due to limited available anatomical landmarks. Published hip joint in-vitro investigations commonly lack details on methods used to achieve reported orientations and the accuracy with which the desired orientation has been achieved. The aim of this study was to develop an accurate method for orienting hip joints with limited anatomical landmarks for in-vitro investigations, and to compare this method against orientation using guiding axes and by visual approximation. The proposed orientation method resulted in orientation angles achieved to within one degree (SD ± 0.58°). For most specimens, orientation using physical tools resulted in errors of ±8° and ±12° in at least one of three orientation angles used to place the femur and pelvis in neutral orientation, respectively. Precision was also worse, with SDs ranging from ±1° to ±5° for orientation angles of femoral specimens and SDs ranging from ±1° to ±8° for pelvic specimens. The error in the orientation angles was worse for orientation by visual approximation and the range of SDs were greater for both the femur and pelvis. Finite element modeling was used to assess the effects of observed orientation errors, on prediction of fracture load. In most cases, the largest error in fracture load among all trials exceeded 30%, relative to a femur oriented without any error in the orientation angles.

[1]  S. Nho,et al.  Labral Reconstruction with Iliotibial Band Autograft and Semitendinosus Allograft Improves Hip Joint Contact Area and Contact Pressure: An In-Vitro Analysis , 2015, Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine.

[2]  Y. Matsuyama,et al.  The effect of impact direction on the fracture load of osteoporotic proximal femurs. , 2009, Medical engineering & physics.

[3]  Sven van den Munckhof,et al.  How accurately can we predict the fracture load of the proximal femur using finite element models? , 2014, Clinical biomechanics.

[4]  Marco Viceconti,et al.  In vitro replication of spontaneous fractures of the proximal human femur. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  David Wright,et al.  Acetabular orientation: anatomical and functional measurement , 2012, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[6]  J. Crook,et al.  Computed tomography analysis of acetabular anteversion and abduction , 2006, Skeletal Radiology.

[7]  G. Bergmann,et al.  Musculo-skeletal loading conditions at the hip during walking and stair climbing. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  F. Taddei,et al.  To what extent can linear finite element models of human femora predict failure under stance and fall loading configurations? , 2014, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  Nancy Lane,et al.  Finite Element Analysis of the Proximal Femur and Hip Fracture Risk in Older Men , 2009, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[10]  A Leardini,et al.  Position and orientation in space of bones during movement: anatomical frame definition and determination. , 1995, Clinical biomechanics.

[11]  Philip C Noble,et al.  THE 2007 FRANK STINCHFIELD AWARD: The Biomechanics of the Hip Labrum and the Stability of the Hip , 2007, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[12]  Serge Van Sint Jan,et al.  Methods for determining hip and lumbosacral joint centers in a seated position from external anatomical landmarks. , 2015, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  F. Eckstein,et al.  Ct-based finite element models can be used to estimate experimentally measured failure loads in the proximal femur. , 2012, Bone.

[14]  G. Bergmann,et al.  Hip joint contact forces during stumbling , 2004, Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.

[15]  M. Bouxsein,et al.  Comparison of hip fracture risk prediction by femoral aBMD to experimentally measured factor of risk. , 2010, Bone.

[16]  Gábor Székely,et al.  Fully automatic and fast segmentation of the femur bone from 3D-CT images with no shape prior , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[17]  Marco Viceconti,et al.  Subject-specific finite element models implementing a maximum principal strain criterion are able to estimate failure risk and fracture location on human femurs tested in vitro. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  T. Harris,et al.  Effect of finite element model loading condition on fracture risk assessment in men and women: the AGES-Reykjavik study. , 2013, Bone.

[19]  P. Augat,et al.  A Biomechanical Evaluation of Orthopaedic Implants for Hip Fractures by Finite Element Analysis and In-Vitro Tests , 2010, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[20]  J. T. Bryant,et al.  An in vitro investigation of the acetabular labral seal in hip joint mechanics. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  Shane J. Nho,et al.  Labral Reconstruction With Iliotibial Band Autografts and Semitendinosus Allografts Improves Hip Joint Contact Area and Contact Pressure , 2014, The American journal of sports medicine.

[22]  David A. Boas,et al.  Tetrahedral mesh generation from volumetric binary and grayscale images , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[23]  J. Goldak,et al.  Femoral fracture load and fracture pattern is accurately predicted using a gradient-enhanced quasi-brittle finite element model. , 2018, Medical engineering & physics.

[24]  G. Bergmann,et al.  Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[25]  Hanspeter Frei,et al.  Effect of boundary conditions, impact loading and hydraulic stiffening on femoral fracture strength. , 2013, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  M. Viceconti,et al.  Accuracy of finite element predictions in sideways load configurations for the proximal human femur. , 2012, Journal of Biomechanics.

[27]  M. Viceconti,et al.  Multiple loading conditions analysis can improve the association between finite element bone strength estimates and proximal femur fractures: a preliminary study in elderly women. , 2014, Bone.

[28]  Shoji Ishii,et al.  Radiographic method to measure the inclination angle of the acetabulum , 2008, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[29]  Hartmut Witte,et al.  ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate system of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion--part I: ankle, hip, and spine. International Society of Biomechanics. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[30]  Joachim Sch NETGEN An advancing front 2D/3D-mesh generator based on abstract rules , 1997 .

[31]  Kozo Nakamura,et al.  Prediction of strength and strain of the proximal femur by a CT-based finite element method. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[32]  W C Hayes,et al.  Force attenuation in trochanteric soft tissues during impact from a fall , 1995, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[33]  Leo Joskowicz,et al.  Acetabular orientation variability and symmetry based on CT scans of adults , 2010, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[34]  E S Grood,et al.  A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee. , 1983, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[35]  P. Srivastava,et al.  Morphometry of Proximal Femur in Indian Population. , 2017, Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR.