A new meshless approach for subject-specific strain prediction in long bones: Evaluation of accuracy.

BACKGROUND The Finite Element Method is at present the method of choice for strain prediction in bones from Computed Tomography data. However, accurate methods rely on the correct topological representation of the bone surface, which requires a massive operator effort, thus restricting their applicability to clinical practice. Meshless methods, which do not rely on a pre-defined topological discretisation of the domain, might greatly improve the numerical process automation, but currently their application to biomechanics is negligible. METHODS A meshless implementation of an innovative numerical approach based on a direct discrete formulation of physical laws, the Cell Method, was developed to predict strains in a cadaver femur from Computed Tomography data. The model accuracy was estimated by comparing the predicted strains with those experimentally measured on the same specimen in a previous study. As a reference, the results were compared to those obtained with a state-of-the-art finite element model. FINDINGS The Cell Method meshless model predicted strains highly correlated with the experimental measurements (R2=0.85) with a good global accuracy (RMSE=15.6%). The model performed slightly worse than the finite element one, but this was probably due to the need to sub-sample the original data, and the lower order of the interpolation used (linear vs parabolic). INTERPRETATION Although there is surely room for improvement, the accuracy already obtained with this meshless implementation of the Cell Method makes it a good candidate for some clinical applications, especially considering the full automation of the method, which does not require any data pre-processing.

[1]  L. Lucy A numerical approach to the testing of the fission hypothesis. , 1977 .

[2]  S. Attaway,et al.  Smoothed particle hydrodynamics stability analysis , 1995 .

[3]  Luis Gavete,et al.  Implementation of essential boundary conditions in a meshless method , 2000 .

[4]  Jamshid Tehranzadeh,et al.  Predicting Proximal Femoral Strength Using Structural Engineering Models , 2005, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[5]  Guangyao Li,et al.  Element‐free Galerkin method for contact problems in metal forming analysis , 2001 .

[6]  W A Kalender,et al.  A phantom for standardization and quality control in spinal bone mineral measurements by QCT and DXA: design considerations and specifications. , 1992, Medical Physics (Lancaster).

[7]  F van Keulen,et al.  Development and experimental validation of a three-dimensional finite element model of the human scapula , 2004, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[8]  T. Keaveny,et al.  Trabecular bone modulus-density relationships depend on anatomic site. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  K. M. Liew,et al.  Meshless method for modeling of human proximal femur: treatment of nonconvex boundaries and stress analysis , 2002 .

[10]  Eugenio Oñate,et al.  A Lagrangian meshless finite element method applied to fluid-structure interaction problems , 2003 .

[11]  Matteo Nicolini,et al.  The meshless approach for the cell method: a new way for the numerical solution of discrete conservation laws , 2003, Int. J. Comput. Eng. Sci..

[12]  Angelo Cappello,et al.  Automatic generation of accurate subject-specific bone finite element models to be used in clinical studies. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  Enzo Tonti,et al.  A Direct Discrete Formulation of Field Laws: The Cell Method , 2001 .

[14]  Ming-Wan Lu,et al.  Imposition of essential boundary conditions by displacement constraint equations in meshless methods , 2001 .

[15]  K. Radermacher,et al.  Critical evaluation of known bone material properties to realize anisotropic FE-simulation of the proximal femur. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  Elías Cueto,et al.  On the employ of meshless methods in biomechanics , 2005 .

[17]  Alberto Leardini,et al.  Multimod Data Manager: A tool for data fusion , 2007, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[18]  Matteo Nicolini,et al.  Extension of the Meshless Approach for the Cell Method to Three-Dimensional Numerical Integration of Discrete Conservation Laws , 2006 .

[19]  Ted Belytschko,et al.  Cracking particles: a simplified meshfree method for arbitrary evolving cracks , 2004 .

[20]  Suvranu De,et al.  Real time simulation of nonlinear tissue response in virtual surgery using the point collocation-based method of finite spheres , 2007 .

[21]  Azim Eskandarian,et al.  Modeling and simulation of osteoporosis and fracture of trabecular bone by meshless method , 2007 .

[22]  M. Viceconti,et al.  Extracting clinically relevant data from finite element simulations. , 2005, Clinical biomechanics.

[23]  G. Bergmann,et al.  Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[24]  Hehua Zhu,et al.  Direct imposition of essential boundary conditions and treatment of material discontinuities in the EFG method , 2004 .

[25]  T. Belytschko,et al.  THE NATURAL ELEMENT METHOD IN SOLID MECHANICS , 1998 .

[26]  Marco Viceconti,et al.  Border-tracing algorithm implementation for the femoral geometry reconstruction , 2001, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[27]  T. Ota,et al.  Fracture simulation of the femoral bone using the finite-element method: How a fracture initiates and proceeds , 1999, Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism.

[28]  Kozo Nakamura,et al.  Prediction of strength and strain of the proximal femur by a CT-based finite element method. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[29]  M. Viceconti,et al.  The material mapping strategy influences the accuracy of CT-based finite element models of bones: an evaluation against experimental measurements. , 2007, Medical engineering & physics.

[30]  Eugenio Oñate,et al.  To mesh or not to mesh. That is the question , 2006 .

[31]  J. Weiss,et al.  Subject-specific finite element model of the pelvis: development, validation and sensitivity studies. , 2005, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[32]  J H Keyak,et al.  Validation of an automated method of three-dimensional finite element modelling of bone. , 1993, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[33]  M Viceconti,et al.  Changes in femur stress after hip resurfacing arthroplasty: response to physiological loads. , 2007, Clinical biomechanics.

[34]  Marco Viceconti,et al.  Subject-specific finite element models of long bones: An in vitro evaluation of the overall accuracy. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[35]  M. Viceconti,et al.  Mechanical strength of a femoral reconstruction in paediatric oncology: A finite element study , 2003, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[36]  D. Cody,et al.  Short Term In Vivo Precision of Proximal Femoral Finite Element Modeling , 2000, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[37]  Marco Viceconti,et al.  Subject-specific finite element models can accurately predict strain levels in long bones. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[38]  Antonio Huerta,et al.  Imposing essential boundary conditions in mesh-free methods , 2004 .

[39]  Martin Berzins,et al.  Simulation of soft tissue failure using the material point method. , 2006, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[40]  M. Viceconti,et al.  A modified method for assigning material properties to FE models of bones. , 2008, Medical engineering & physics.