A unified account of the conjunction fallacy by coherence

We propose a coherence account of the conjunction fallacy applicable to both of its two paradigms (the M–A paradigm and the A–B paradigm). We compare our account with a recent proposal by Tentori et al. (J Exp Psychol Gen 142(1): 235–255, 2013) that attempts to generalize earlier confirmation accounts. Their model works better than its predecessors in some respects, but it exhibits only a shallow form of generality and is unsatisfactory in other ways as well: it is strained, complex, and untestable as it stands. Our coherence account inherits the strength of the confirmation account, but in addition to being applicable to both paradigms, it is natural, simple, and readily testable. It thus constitutes the next natural step for Bayesian theorizing about the conjunction fallacy.

[1]  Rudolf Carnap,et al.  Logical foundations of probability , 1951 .

[2]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[3]  Riccardo Viale,et al.  On the reality of the conjunction fallacy , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[4]  W. Meijs.  Coherence as Generalized Logical Equivalence , 2006 .

[5]  Katya Tentori,et al.  On the determinants of the conjunction fallacy: Confirmation versus probability , 2013 .

[6]  Michael Schippers.  Competing accounts of contrastive coherence , 2015, Synthese.

[7]  David H. Glass.  Coherence, Explanation, and Bayesian Networks , 2002, AICS.

[8]  R. Carnap.  Logical Foundations of Probability, Second Edition , 1963 .

[9]  G. Gigerenzer.  On Narrow Norms and Vague Heuristics: A Reply to Kahneman and Tversky (1996) , 1996 .

[10]  Tomoji Shogenji,et al.  Is coherence truth conducive , 1999 .

[11]  James A. Hampton,et al.  The inverse conjunction fallacy , 2006 .

[12]  E. Olsson.  What Is the Problem of Coherence and Truth , 2002 .

[13]  Roderick M. Chisholm,et al.  Theory of Knowledge , 1989 .

[14]  P. Thagard,et al.  Explanatory coherence , 1993 .

[15]  P. Henle,et al.  An Analysis of Knowledge and Valuation , 1948 .

[16]  Malcolm R. Forster,et al.  How to Tell When Simpler, More Unified, or Less Ad Hoc Theories will Provide More Accurate Predictions , 1994, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[17]  E. Olsson.  Against Coherence: Truth, Probability, and Justification , 2005 .

[18]  Vincenzo Crupi,et al.  On the determinants of the conjunction fallacy: probability versus inductive confirmation. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[19]  Martin L. Jönsson,et al.  A problem for confirmation theoretic accounts of the conjunction fallacy , 2016 .

[20]  Elliott Sober,et al.  Ockham's Razors: A User's Manual , 2015 .

[21]  Tomoji Shogenji.  The degree of epistemic justification and the conjunction fallacy , 2009, Synthese.

[22]  Igor Douven,et al.  Measuring coherence , 2006, Synthese.

[23]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Typicality and reasoning fallacies , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[24]  A. Tversky,et al.  Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: the conjunction fallacy in probability judgment , 1983 .

[25]  Jakob Koscholke,et al.  Against relative overlap measures of coherence , 2015, Synthese.

[26]  J. Koehler.  The base rate fallacy reconsidered: Descriptive, normative, and methodological challenges , 1996, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[27]  J. Schupbach.  New Hope for Shogenji's Coherence Measure , 2011, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[28]  Jakob Koscholke.  Evaluating Test Cases for Probabilistic Measures of Coherence , 2016 .

[29]  Tomoji Shogenji,et al.  Dwindling Confirmation , 2014, Philosophy of Science.

[30]  R. William.  Coherence and probability: A probabilistic account of coherence , 2013 .

[31]  M. Bar-Hillel.  The base-rate fallacy in probability judgments. , 1980 .

[32]  Branden Fitelson,et al.  Probability, confirmation, and the conjunction fallacy , 2008 .

[33]  Stephan Hartmann,et al.  A Probabilistic Theory of the Coherence of an Information Set , 2001 .