The Relationship between Academic Discipline and Dialogic Behavior in Open University Course Forums

The objective of this study was to determine the relationship between disciplinary difference (exact and natural sciences versus humanities) and the dialogic behavior that occurred in Open University course forums. Dialogic behavior was measured in terms of students’ and instructors’ active participation in the forum (posting a message) as well as amounts and proportions of “teaching presence,” “cognitive presence,” and “social presence.” We found that active participation in the science forums was much higher than in the humanities forums. We also found a ratio among the three presences that was constant across different academic disciplines, as well as across different group sizes and course types.

[1]  Peter Shea,et al.  Community of inquiry as a theoretical framework to foster "epistemic engagement" and "cognitive presence" in online education , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[2]  Tony Becher.  The significance of disciplinary differences , 1994 .

[3]  Carla R. Payne.  Information Technology and Constructivism in Higher Education: Progressive Learning Frameworks , 2009 .

[4]  Karen Swan,et al.  The Development of Virtual Learning Communities , 2005 .

[5]  J. Dewey,et al.  How We Think , 2009 .

[6]  A. Hwang,et al.  Does "teaching presence" exist in online MBA courses? , 2006, Internet High. Educ..

[7]  D. Garrison,et al.  Exploring causal relationships among teaching, cognitive and social presence: Student perceptions of the community of inquiry framework , 2010, Internet High. Educ..

[8]  Avner Caspi,et al.  Dialogue in a distance education physics course , 2004 .

[9]  Avner Caspi,et al.  Campus‐based university students’ use of dialogue , 2006 .

[10]  A. Biglan.  The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. , 1973 .

[11]  Rena M. Palloff,et al.  The Virtual Student. A Profile and Guide to Working with Online Learners. The Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. , 2003 .

[12]  D. Garrison,et al.  Methodological Issues in the Content Analysis of Computer Conference Transcripts , 2007 .

[13]  Terry Anderson,et al.  Validity Issues In Quantitative Computer Conference Transcript Analysis , 2004 .

[14]  D. Garrison,et al.  Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions , 2007, Internet High. Educ..

[15]  P. Gorsky,et al.  Use of Instructional Dialogue by University Students in a Difficult Distance Education Physics Course , 2007 .

[16]  Karen Swan,et al.  Validating a Measurement Tool of Presen ce in Online Communities of Inquiry , 2008 .

[17]  Peter Shea,et al.  A re-examination of the community of inquiry framework: Social network and content analysis , 2010, Internet High. Educ..

[18]  C. Gunawardena,et al.  Developing, testing and refining of a model to understand the relationship between peer interaction and learning outcomes in computer‐mediated conferencing , 2004 .

[19]  Begoña Gros,et al.  EL PROBLEMA DEL ANÁLISIS DE LAS DISCUSIONES ASINCRÓNICAS EN EL APRENDIZAJE COLABORATIVO MEDIADO , 2006 .

[20]  W. Heisenberg.  Physics and Philosophy: The Revolution in Modern Science , 1958 .

[21]  Tammy Schellens,et al.  Content analysis schemes to analyze transcripts of online asynchronous discussion groups: A review , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[22]  Elizabeth Murphy,et al.  Recognising and promoting collaboration in an online asynchronous discussion , 2004, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[23]  Martha Cleveland-Innes,et al.  Revisiting methodological issues in transcript analysis: Negotiated coding and reliability , 2006, Internet High. Educ..

[24]  Sue Byrd Steinweg,et al.  Maintaining the Personal Touch in a Growing Program: Strategies for Establishing Social Presence in Online Classes , 2009 .

[25]  J. B. Arbaugh,et al.  Does the Community of Inquiry Framework Predict Outcomes in Online MBA Courses , 2007 .

[26]  Kimberly A. Neuendorf,et al.  The Content Analysis Guidebook , 2001 .

[27]  D. Randy Garrison,et al.  Critical Thinking and Computer Conferencing: A Model and Tool to Assess Cognitive Presence , 2001 .

[28]  D. Randy Garrison,et al.  Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education , 1999, Internet High. Educ..

[29]  P. Fahy.  Addressing some Common Problems in Transcript Analysis , 2001 .

[30]  P. Gorsky,et al.  Online Teaching Effectiveness: A Tale of Two Instructors , 2009 .

[31]  Senom T. Yalcin,et al.  Online Learning: Patterns of Engagement and Interaction among In-Service teachers , 2003 .

[32]  Heather Kanuka,et al.  Learning in Communities of Inquiry: A Review of the Literature , 2009 .

[33]  D. Randy Garrison,et al.  The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: A retrospective , 2010, Internet High. Educ..

[34]  Jennifer C. Richardson,et al.  A Constructivist Approach to Online Learning: The Community of Inquiry Framework , 2009 .

[35]  Tony Becher.  Academic Tribes And Territories , 1989 .

[36]  Alfred P. Rovai,et al.  The Internet and Higher Education , 2009 .

[37]  R. Neumann.  Disciplinary Differences and University Teaching , 2001 .

[38]  Nc Usa,et al.  Key Elements of Building Online Community: Comparing Faculty and Student Perceptions , 2007 .

[39]  D. Garrison,et al.  Online and Blended Communities of Inquiry: Exploring the Developmental and Perceptional Differences. , 2009 .

[40]  Karen Swan,et al.  A Response to the Review of the Community of Inquiry Framework , 2009 .

[41]  Doris U. Bolliger,et al.  The Virtual Student: A Profile and Guide to Working with Online Learners , 2005 .

[42]  Avner Caspi,et al.  The influence of group size on nonmandatory asynchronous instructional discussion groups , 2003, Internet High. Educ..

[43]  Tony Becher,et al.  Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines , 2001 .

[44]  Peter Shea,et al.  Cognitive presence and online learner engagement: a cluster analysis of the community of inquiry framework , 2009, J. Comput. High. Educ..

[45]  Avner Caspi,et al.  Use of Instructional Dialogue by University Students in a Distance Education Chemistry Course , 2004 .

[46]  D. Garrison,et al.  Assessing Social Presence In Asynchronous Text-based Computer Conferencing , 1999 .

[47]  J. B. Arbaugh,et al.  Subject matter effects and the Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework: An exploratory study , 2010, Internet High. Educ..

[48]  P. Shea,et al.  A study of teaching presence and student sense of learning community in fully online and web-enhanced college courses , 2006, Internet High. Educ..

[49]  Justyna Ciszewska-Carr,et al.  Sources of Difference in Reliability: Identifying Sources of Difference in Reliability in Content Analysis of Online Asynchronous Discussions. , 2005 .

[50]  D. Garrison,et al.  Facilitating Cognitive Presence in Online Learning: Interaction Is Not Enough , 2005 .

[51]  L. S. Vygotskiĭ,et al.  Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[52]  Norman Vaughan,et al.  Investigating how a blended learning approach can support an inquiry process within a faculty learning community , 2004 .

[53]  Tony Becher,et al.  Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines , 2001 .

[54]  W. Bean.  Physics and Philosophy, the Revolution in Modern Science. , 1959 .

[55]  Stanley Varnhagen,et al.  Comparison of Student Experiences with Different Online Graduate Courses in Health Promotion , 2005 .