Laboratorial test monitoring applying photogrammetric post-processing procedures to surface displacements

Abstract Most of the traditional laboratorial methods for monitoring displacements and strains at the surface of the specimen present several constraints, namely: (i) limitations in hardware positioning; (ii) costly equipment and human resources; and (iii) time-consuming data processing. Consequently, the development of new methods capable of eliminating these drawbacks is of utmost interest. Herein, a new technique for laboratorial test monitoring is presented. By using photogrammetry and image post-processing, all the above mentioned drawbacks are overcome. Furthermore: (i) both displacement and strain fields can be monitored at a practically unlimited number of target points at any stage; (ii) it is a cost effective method, since data is acquired with non-professional digital cameras; and (iii) it is a fast procedure since data is automatically processed. Additionally, high precision is reached allowing an accurate characterisation of the fracture localisation process, including the establishment of a correlation between the latter and the localisation of cracks and their evolution in time.

[1]  J. Z. Zhu,et al.  The superconvergent patch recovery and a posteriori error estimates. Part 1: The recovery technique , 1992 .

[2]  Kenneth R. White,et al.  Close-range photogrammetry applications in bridge measurement: Literature review , 2008 .

[3]  Y. H. Huang,et al.  Optical strain gauge vs. traditional strain gauges for concrete elasticity modulus determination , 2010 .

[4]  F. Marazzi,et al.  Traditional vs innovative structural health monitoring of monumental structures: A case study , 2011 .

[5]  A. Mattock,et al.  Shear Transfer in Reinforced Concrete , 1969 .

[6]  Uwe Hampel,et al.  Photogrammetric techniques in civil engineering material testing and structure monitoring , 2006 .

[7]  A. A. C. Meneguette EVALUATION OF METRIC CAMERA PHOTOGRAPHY FOR MAPPING AND CO‐ORDINATE DETERMINATION , 2006 .

[8]  Dierk Raabe,et al.  Experimental investigation of plastic grain interaction , 2002 .

[9]  O R Kolbl METRIC OR NON-METRIC CAMERAS , 1976 .

[10]  Eduardo Júlio,et al.  Development of a laser roughness analyser to predict in situ the bond strength of concrete-to-concrete interfaces , 2008 .

[11]  C. Fraser,et al.  Monitoring the thermal deformation of steel beams via vision metrology , 2000 .

[12]  Stefan Cantré,et al.  Applications of low-budget photogrammetry in the geotechnical laboratory , 2009 .

[13]  D. D. Lichti,et al.  MEASUREMENT OF DEFLECTIONS IN CONCRETE BEAMS BY CLOSE- RANGE DIGITAL PHOTOGRAMMETRY , 2002 .

[14]  David Barber,et al.  Geomatics Techniques for Structural Surveying , 2004 .

[15]  Fernando A. Branco,et al.  Influence of added concrete compressive strength on adhesion to an existing concrete substrate , 2006 .

[16]  David V. Jáuregui,et al.  Noncontact Photogrammetric Measurement of Vertical Bridge Deflection , 2003 .

[17]  David P. Dobkin,et al.  The quickhull algorithm for convex hulls , 1996, TOMS.

[18]  A W Beeby,et al.  CONCISE EUROCODE FOR THE DESIGN OF CONCRETE BUILDINGS. BASED ON BSI PUBLICATION DD ENV 1992-1-1: 1992. EUROCODE 2: DESIGN OF CONCRETE STRUCTURES. PART 1: GENERAL RULES AND RULES FOR BUILDINGS , 1993 .

[19]  S. I. Granshaw,et al.  BUNDLE ADJUSTMENT METHODS IN ENGINEERING PHOTOGRAMMETRY , 2006 .

[20]  Riccardo Roncella,et al.  Analysis of the failure mechanisms of a weak rock through photogrammetrical measurements , 2008, CP 2013.

[21]  L. Sluys,et al.  Towards a generalization of a discrete strong discontinuity approach , 2009 .