Optimised information gathering in smartphone users

Human activities from hunting to emailing are performed in a fractal-like scale invariant pattern. These patterns are considered efficient for hunting or foraging, but are they efficient for gathering information? Here we link the scale invariant pattern of inter-touch intervals on the smartphone to optimal strategies for information gathering. We recorded touchscreen touches in 65 individuals for a month and categorized the activity into checking for information vs. sharing content. For both categories, the inter-touch intervals were well described by power-law fits spanning 5 orders of magnitude, from 1 s to several hours. The power-law exponent typically found for checking was 1.5 and for generating it was 1.3. Next, by using computer simulations we addressed whether the checking pattern was efficient - in terms of minimizing futile attempts yielding no new information. We find that the best performing power law exponent depends on the duration of the assessment and the exponent of 1.5 was the most efficient in the short-term i.e. in the few minutes range. Finally, we addressed whether how people generated and shared content was in tune with the checking pattern. We assumed that the unchecked posts must be minimized for maximal efficiency and according to our analysis the most efficient temporal pattern to share content was the exponent of 1.3 - which was also the pattern displayed by the smartphone users. The behavioral organization for content generation is different from content consumption across time scales. We propose that this difference is a signature of optimal behavior and the short-term assessments used in modern human actions.

[1]  R. Menzel,et al.  Displaced honey bees perform optimal scale-free search flights. , 2007, Ecology.

[2]  Marshall G. Hussain Shuler,et al.  Rationalizing spatial exploration patterns of wild animals and humans through a temporal discounting framework , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  C. Frith The social brain? , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Human dynamics: Darwin and Einstein correspondence patterns , 2005, Nature.

[5]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Modeling bursts and heavy tails in human dynamics , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[6]  R. Hidalgo,et al.  Conditions for the emergence of scaling in the inter-event time of uncorrelated and seasonal systems , 2006 .

[7]  Jayanth R Banavar,et al.  Scale invariance in the dynamics of spontaneous behavior , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Eric M. Rouiller,et al.  Processing from Fingertips in Touchscreen Phone Users , 2015 .

[9]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  The origin of bursts and heavy tails in human dynamics , 2005, Nature.

[10]  H. Weimerskirch,et al.  Evidence for olfactory search in wandering albatross, Diomedea exulans , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  A. Vazquez,et al.  Impact of interactions on human dynamics , 2007, 0710.4916.

[12]  H. Stanley,et al.  Optimizing the success of random searches , 1999, Nature.

[13]  Arko Ghosh,et al.  Neuronal control of the fingertips is socially configured in touchscreen smartphone users , 2016, bioRxiv.

[14]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  Power-Law Distributions in Empirical Data , 2007, SIAM Rev..

[15]  F. Marlowe,et al.  Evidence of Lévy walk foraging patterns in human hunter–gatherers , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  A. Reynolds,et al.  Pelagic seabird flight patterns are consistent with a reliance on olfactory maps for oceanic navigation , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[17]  David W. Sims,et al.  Scaling laws of ambush predator ‘waiting’ behaviour are tuned to a common ecology , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[18]  Lévy patterns in seabirds are multifaceted describing both spatial and temporal patterning , 2016, Frontiers in Zoology.

[19]  Stephen Ornes,et al.  Foraging flights , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  Eric M. Rouiller,et al.  Use-Dependent Cortical Processing from Fingertips in Touchscreen Phone Users , 2015, Current Biology.

[21]  R. Adolphs Social cognition and the human brain , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.