Moving beyond qualitative evaluations of Bayesian models of cognition

Bayesian models of cognition provide a powerful way to understand the behavior and goals of individuals from a computational point of view. Much of the focus in the Bayesian cognitive modeling approach has been on qualitative model evaluations, where predictions from the models are compared to data that is often averaged over individuals. In many cognitive tasks, however, there are pervasive individual differences. We introduce an approach to directly infer individual differences related to subjective mental representations within the framework of Bayesian models of cognition. In this approach, Bayesian data analysis methods are used to estimate cognitive parameters and motivate the inference process within a Bayesian cognitive model. We illustrate this integrative Bayesian approach on a model of memory. We apply the model to behavioral data from a memory experiment involving the recall of heights of people. A cross-validation analysis shows that the Bayesian memory model with inferred subjective priors predicts withheld data better than a Bayesian model where the priors are based on environmental statistics. In addition, the model with inferred priors at the individual subject level led to the best overall generalization performance, suggesting that individual differences are important to consider in Bayesian models of cognition.

[1]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  A model for recognition memory: REM—retrieving effectively from memory , 1997, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[2]  Adam N. Sanborn,et al.  Uncovering mental representations with Markov chain Monte Carlo , 2010, Cognitive Psychology.

[3]  M. Lee Three case studies in the Bayesian analysis of cognitive models , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[4]  David B. Dunson,et al.  Bayesian Data Analysis , 2010 .

[5]  K. Flegal,et al.  Anthropometric reference data for children and adults: United States, 2003–2006. , 2008, National health statistics reports.

[6]  Thomas E. Nelson,et al.  Everyday base rates (sex stereotypes): Potent and resilient. , 1990 .

[7]  M. Lengyel,et al.  Mind Reading by Machine Learning: A Doubly Bayesian Method for Inferring Mental Representations , 2010 .

[8]  J. Kruschke Doing Bayesian Data Analysis: A Tutorial with R and BUGS , 2010 .

[9]  M. Lee,et al.  A Bayesian analysis of human decision-making on bandit problems , 2009 .

[10]  Pernille Hemmer,et al.  A Bayesian Account of Reconstructive Memory , 2009, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[11]  Mark A. Pitt,et al.  Toward a method of selecting among computational models of cognition. , 2002 .

[12]  T. Griffiths,et al.  A rational analysis of the effects of memory biases on serial reproduction , 2010, Cognitive Psychology.

[13]  Thomas L. Griffiths,et al.  Markov Chain Monte Carlo with People , 2007, NIPS.

[14]  T. Griffiths,et al.  Probabilistic inference in human semantic memory , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[15]  J. Bowers,et al.  Bayesian just-so stories in psychology and neuroscience. , 2012, Psychological bulletin.

[16]  Martyn Plummer,et al.  JAGS: A program for analysis of Bayesian graphical models using Gibbs sampling , 2003 .

[17]  N. Chater,et al.  Rational models of cognition , 1998 .

[18]  W. Estes The problem of inference from curves based on group data. , 1956, Psychological bulletin.

[19]  N. Chater,et al.  An introduction to rational models of cognition , 1998 .

[20]  I. J. Myung,et al.  Toward a method of selecting among computational models of cognition. , 2002, Psychological review.

[21]  M. Lee,et al.  Modeling individual differences in cognition , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[22]  Nash Unsworth,et al.  Individual differences in working memory capacity and episodic retrieval: examining the dynamics of delayed and continuous distractor free recall. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[23]  Bradley P. Carlin,et al.  Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit , 2002 .

[24]  E. Davis,et al.  How Robust Are Probabilistic Models of Higher-Level Cognition? , 2013, Psychological science.

[25]  Nick Chater,et al.  A rational analysis of the selection task as optimal data selection. , 1994 .

[26]  Jack L. Vevea,et al.  Why do categories affect stimulus judgment? , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[27]  Michael D. Lee,et al.  A Model of Knower-Level Behavior in Number Concept Development , 2009, Cogn. Sci..

[28]  T. Griffiths,et al.  Modeling individual differences using Dirichlet processes , 2006 .

[29]  Thomas L. Griffiths,et al.  Rational analysis as a link between human memory and information retrieval , 2008 .

[30]  Jeffrey S. Bowers,et al.  Is that what Bayesians believe? reply to Griffiths, Chater, Norris, and Pouget (2012). , 2012, Psychological bulletin.

[31]  B. Love,et al.  The myth of computational level theory and the vacuity of rational analysis , 2011, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[32]  J. Tenenbaum,et al.  Generalization, similarity, and Bayesian inference. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[33]  Harold Pashler,et al.  Optimal Predictions in Everyday Cognition: The Wisdom of Individuals or Crowds? , 2008, Cogn. Sci..

[34]  A. Higashiyama,et al.  Estimation of height for persons in pictures , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[35]  E. Wagenmakers,et al.  Bayesian hypothesis testing for psychologists: A tutorial on the Savage–Dickey method , 2010, Cognitive Psychology.

[36]  John R. Anderson,et al.  The Adaptive Character of Thought , 1990 .

[37]  Tom Lodewyckx,et al.  A tutorial on Bayes factor estimation with the product space method , 2011 .

[38]  Refractor Vision , 2000, The Lancet.

[39]  Thomas L. Griffiths,et al.  Testing the Efficiency of Markov Chain Monte Carlo With People Using Facial Affect Categories , 2012, Cogn. Sci..

[40]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Observing the Observer (I): Meta-Bayesian Models of Learning and Decision-Making , 2010, PloS one.

[41]  Estes Wk The problem of inference from curves based on group data. , 1956 .

[42]  C. Ogden,et al.  Anthropometric reference data for children and adults: United States, 2007-2010. , 2012, Vital and health statistics. Series 11, Data from the National Health Survey.

[43]  M. Lee,et al.  The aesthetic appeal of minimal structures: Judging the attractiveness of solutions to traveling salesperson problems , 2006, Perception & psychophysics.