Effects of uncertainty and variability on population declines and IUCN Red List classifications

The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List Categories and Criteria is a quantitative framework for classifying species according to extinction risk. Population models may be used to estimate extinction risk or population declines. Uncertainty and variability arise in threat classifications through measurement and process error in empirical data and uncertainty in the models used to estimate extinction risk and population declines. Furthermore, species traits are known to affect extinction risk. We investigated the effects of measurement and process error, model type, population growth rate, and age at first reproduction on the reliability of risk classifications based on projected population declines on IUCN Red List classifications. We used an age‐structured population model to simulate true population trajectories with different growth rates, reproductive ages and levels of variation, and subjected them to measurement error. We evaluated the ability of scalar and matrix models parameterized with these simulated time series to accurately capture the IUCN Red List classification generated with true population declines. Under all levels of measurement error tested and low process error, classifications were reasonably accurate; scalar and matrix models yielded roughly the same rate of misclassifications, but the distribution of errors differed; matrix models led to greater overestimation of extinction risk than underestimations; process error tended to contribute to misclassifications to a greater extent than measurement error; and more misclassifications occurred for fast, rather than slow, life histories. These results indicate that classifications of highly threatened taxa (i.e., taxa with low growth rates) under criterion A are more likely to be reliable than for less threatened taxa when assessed with population models. Greater scrutiny needs to be placed on data used to parameterize population models for species with high growth rates, particularly when available evidence indicates a potential transition to higher risk categories.

[1]  D. Keith,et al.  Inferring extinctions III: A cost-benefit framework for listing extinct species , 2017 .

[2]  Helen M. Regan,et al.  Combined Influences of Model Choice, Data Quality, and Data Quantity When Estimating Population Trends , 2015, PloS one.

[3]  J. Franklin,et al.  Predicting the impact of fire on a vulnerable multi-species community using a dynamic vegetation model , 2015 .

[4]  R. Peterman,et al.  Reliable Identification of Declining Populations in an Uncertain World , 2015 .

[5]  R. Peterman,et al.  The false classification of extinction risk in noisy environments , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  J. Gaillard,et al.  How Life History Influences Population Dynamics in Fluctuating Environments , 2013, The American Naturalist.

[7]  Tracey J Regan,et al.  Testing Decision Rules for Categorizing Species’ Extinction Risk to Help Develop Quantitative Listing Criteria for the U.S. Endangered Species Act , 2013, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[8]  C. Asquith,et al.  Life history predicts risk of species decline in a stochastic world , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[9]  Hugh P Possingham,et al.  Variability in Population Abundance and the Classification of Extinction Risk , 2011, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[10]  Michael C Runge,et al.  Climate change threatens polar bear populations: a stochastic demographic analysis. , 2010, Ecology.

[11]  Liana N. Joseph,et al.  Optimal Allocation of Resources among Threatened Species: a Project Prioritization Protocol , 2009, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[12]  E J Milner-Gulland,et al.  Quantification of Extinction Risk: IUCN's System for Classifying Threatened Species , 2008, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[13]  N. Leader‐Williams,et al.  Can bans stimulate wildlife trade? , 2007, Nature.

[14]  Madan K. Oli,et al.  Relative importance of avian life-history variables to population growth rate , 2006 .

[15]  S. Andelman,et al.  A review of protocols for selecting species at risk in the context of US Forest Service viability assessments , 2004 .

[16]  Helen M. Regan,et al.  Treatments of Uncertainty and Variability in Ecological Risk Assessment of Single-Species Populations , 2003 .

[17]  Helen M. Regan,et al.  A TAXONOMY AND TREATMENT OF UNCERTAINTY FOR ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION BIOLOGY , 2002 .

[18]  H. Resit Akçakaya,et al.  Critiques of PVA Ask the Wrong Questions: Throwing the Heuristic Baby Out with the Numerical Bath Water , 2002, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[19]  J. L. Gittleman,et al.  Predicting extinction risk in declining species , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[20]  M. Rochet May life history traits be used as indices of population viability , 2000 .

[21]  T. Slone,et al.  A comparison of price, rarity and cost of butterfly specimens: Implications for the insect trade and for habitat conservation , 1997 .

[22]  B. Taylor,et al.  The Reliability of Using Population Viability Analysis for Risk Classification of Species , 1995 .

[23]  R. Lande Risks of Population Extinction from Demographic and Environmental Stochasticity and Random Catastrophes , 1993, The American Naturalist.

[24]  S. Stearns The influence of size and phylogeny on patterns of covariation among life-history traits in the mammals , 1983 .

[25]  Shripad Tuljapurkar,et al.  Population dynamics in variable environments I. Long-run growth rates and extinction , 1980 .

[26]  B. Kendall,et al.  Longevity can buffer plant and animal populations against changing climatic variability. , 2008, Ecology.

[27]  R. Shine,et al.  What makes a species vulnerable to extinction? Comparative life-history traits of two sympatric snakes , 2002, Ecological Research.

[28]  Helen M. Regan,et al.  A proposal for fuzzy International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) categories and criteria , 2000 .

[29]  Stephen C. Steams The influence of size and phylogeny on patterns of covariation among life-history traits in the mammals , 1983 .