Decentralized array processing using the MODE algorithm

Centralized methods for source location using sensor arrays have computational and communication burdens that increase significantly with the number of sensors in the array. Therefore, these methods may not be usable in the applications involving very large arrays. In such applications, the data processing may need to be decentralized. This paper introduces two methods for decentralized array processing, based on the recently proposed MODE algorithm. For prescribed nonoverlapping subarrays, both methods are shown to be statistically optimal in the sense that asymptotically they provide the most accurate decentralized estimates of source location parameters. The problem of subarray selection to further optimize the estimation accuracy is only briefly addressed. The two methods are intended for different types of applications: the first should be preferred when there exist significant possibilities for local processing or for parallel computation in the central processor; otherwise the second method should be preferred. The accuracy of the two decentralized methods is compared to the centralized Cramér-Rao bound, both analytically and numerically, in order to provide indications about the loss of accuracy associated with decentralized processing.

[1]  Ralph Otto Schmidt,et al.  A signal subspace approach to multiple emitter location and spectral estimation , 1981 .

[2]  Thomas Kailath,et al.  Decentralized processing in sensor arrays , 1985, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[3]  Torsten Söderström,et al.  Statistical analysis of decentralized MUSIC , 1992 .

[4]  Thomas Kailath,et al.  Detection of signals by information theoretic criteria , 1985, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[5]  Petre Stoica,et al.  Performance study of conditional and unconditional direction-of-arrival estimation , 1990, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[6]  P. Stoica,et al.  Novel eigenanalysis method for direction estimation , 1990 .

[7]  Mats Viberg,et al.  Subspace fitting concepts in sensor array processing , 1990 .

[8]  J. Bohme,et al.  Accuracy of maximum-likelihood estimates for array processing , 1987, ICASSP '87. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[9]  Rangasami L. Kashyap,et al.  Robust decentralized direction-of-arrival estimation in contaminated noise , 1990, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[10]  Petre Stoica,et al.  Maximum likelihood methods for direction-of-arrival estimation , 1990, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[11]  Petre Stoica,et al.  MUSIC, maximum likelihood, and Cramer-Rao bound: further results and comparisons , 1990, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[12]  Petre Stoica,et al.  MUSIC, maximum likelihood, and Cramer-Rao bound , 1989, IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[13]  Petre Stoica,et al.  Decentralized Control , 2018, The Control Systems Handbook.

[14]  B Ottersten,et al.  Parametric subspace fitting methods for array signal processing , 1990 .