Big Vendor vs. Little Vendor: Managing the Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Project to Overcome the Laggard Sales Barrier

The majority of international organizations, especially technologist "fast or first movers" who invest in a new enterprise resource planning systems ERP project are considered Laggards or "late arrivers" by a major software vendor. The majority of the Laggards segment does not purchase ERP software from a vendor without an established track record. Obviously, small or less prestigious vendors have difficulty fulfilling their bottom line without tapping the Laggards market. This paper is a critical and non-empirical review to better understand this complex phenomenon. A case study was conducted within a large public sector university in Australasia during a major ERP-managed project utilizing the Diffusion of Innovations theory integrating it with the concepts of internationalization. The findings confirm that small software vendors have a great challenge to overcome. But the Diffusion of Innovation could be one of many social analysis building blocks for promoting the "Little Vendor" over the "Big Vendor."

[1]  John Naisbitt,et al.  Global Paradox: The Bigger the World Econmy, the More Powerful Its Smallest Players , 1993 .

[2]  Anita M. McGahan,et al.  CONTEXT, TECHNOLOGY AND STRATEGY: FORGING NEW PERSPECTIVES ON THE INDUSTRY LIFE CYCLE , 2004 .

[3]  Erja Mustonen-Ollila,et al.  Why organizations adopt information system process innovations: a longitudinal study using Diffusion of Innovation theory , 2003, Inf. Syst. J..

[4]  A. Sohal,et al.  IT governance and management in large Australian organisations , 2002 .

[5]  J. Weerawardena.  Exploring the role of market learning capability in competitive strategy , 2003 .

[6]  Mastura Jaafar,et al.  Construction Briefing Process in Malaysia: Procedures and Problems in the Public Sector , 2011, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Proj. Manag..

[7]  Andreas M Riege,et al.  Validity and reliability tests in case study research: a literature review with “hands‐on” applications for each research phase , 2003 .

[8]  R. Zmud.  An Examination of Push-Pull Theory Applied to Process Innovation in Knowledge Work , 1984 .

[9]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[10]  Juett R. Cooper.  A multidimensional approach to the adoption of innovation , 1998 .

[11]  C. Argyris.  Reasons and rationalizations : the limits to organizational knowledge , 2004 .

[12]  D. Leonard-Barton,et al.  Implementation as mutual adaptation of technology and organization , 1988 .

[13]  Robert K. Yin,et al.  Applications of case study research , 1993 .

[14]  Graeme G. Shanks,et al.  Successfully completing case study research: combining rigour, relevance and pragmatism , 1998, Inf. Syst. J..

[15]  E. Rogers,et al.  Communication of innovations: A cross-cultural approach, 2nd ed. , 1971 .

[16]  J. Barney.  Strategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck, and Business Strategy , 1986 .

[17]  R. Solms,et al.  IT oversight: an important function of corporate governance , 2005 .

[18]  Gifford Pinchot,et al.  Intrapreneuring in Action: A Handbook for Business Innovation , 1999 .

[19]  R. Duane Ireland,et al.  Integrating entrepreneurship and strategic management actions to create firm wealth , 2001 .

[20]  B MilesMatthew,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis , 2009, Approaches and Processes of Social Science Research.

[21]  G. Zaltman,et al.  Innovations and organizations , 2020, Organizational Innovation.

[22]  B. D. Wit,et al.  Strategy: Process, Content, Context: An International Perspective , 1994 .

[23]  Suzanne Rivard,et al.  A Multilevel Model of Resistance to Information Technology Implementation , 2005, MIS Q..

[24]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method , 1995 .

[25]  Shaker A. Zahra,et al.  Emerging Issues in Corporate Entrepreneurship , 2003 .

[26]  Lee P. Ruddin,et al.  You Can Generalize Stupid! Social Scientists, Bent Flyvbjerg, and Case Study Methodology , 2006 .

[27]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Arrangements for Information Technology Governance: A Theory of Multiple Contingencies , 1999, MIS Q..

[28]  J. Johanson,et al.  Internationalisation in Industrial Systems — A Network Approach , 1988 .

[29]  John Bessant,et al.  Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market, and Organizational Change, 2nd Edition , 2001 .

[30]  J. A. Blair,et al.  Logical Self-Defense , 1977 .

[31]  Z. Bauman.  Afterthought: On Writing; On Writing Sociology , 2002 .

[32]  Sue A. Conger,et al.  INNOVATIONS : A CLASSIFICATION BY IT LOCUS OF IMPACT AND RESEARCH APPROACH , 2002 .

[33]  M. D. Myers,et al.  An introduction to qualitative research in information systems , 2002 .

[34]  C. Prahalad,et al.  Strategy as stretch and leverage. , 1993, Harvard business review.

[35]  Nikolaos Sariannidis,et al.  Project Commitment in the Context of Information Security , 2011, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Proj. Manag..

[36]  Peter Haried,et al.  Stakeholder Challenges in Information Systems Project Offshoring: Client and Vendor Perspectives , 2011, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Proj. Manag..

[37]  John W. Murphy.  Globalization: A Critical Introduction, 2nd edn , 2006 .

[38]  Tony Davila,et al.  Making Innovation Work: How to Manage It, Measure It, and Profit from It , 2005 .

[39]  R. Daft.  A Dual-Core Model of Organizational Innovation , 1978 .

[40]  D. Leonard-Barton,et al.  Experts as Negative Opinion Leaders in the Diffusion of a Technological Innovation , 1985 .

[41]  S. Clegg,et al.  Noise, Parasites and Translation , 2004 .

[42]  Barriers to Internationalization , 1993 .

[43]  A. Farazmand.  Sound Governance: Policy and Administrative Innovations , 2004 .

[44]  C. K. Prahalad,et al.  The New Age of Innovation: Driving Cocreated Value Through Global Networks , 2008 .

[45]  M. Tushman,et al.  Managing Strategic Innovation and Change: A Collection of Readings , 1996 .

[46]  R. Wolfe.  ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION: REVIEW, CRITIQUE AND SUGGESTED RESEARCH DIRECTIONS* , 1994 .

[47]  Paul F. Lazarsfeld,et al.  Mass communication popular taste and organized social action. , 1948 .

[48]  T. H. Kwon,et al.  Unifying the fragmented models of information systems implementation , 1987 .

[49]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  An extended platform logic perspective of IT governance: managing perceptions and activities of IT , 2003, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[50]  Richard Leifer,et al.  Radical Innovation: How Mature Companies Can Outsmart Upstarts , 2000 .

[51]  Sheila Jasanoff,et al.  Handbook of Science and Technology Studies , 1995 .

[52]  Kenneth A. Kozar,et al.  Adopting Systems Development Methods: An Exploratory Study , 1989, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[53]  Fred D. Davis.  A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems : theory and results , 1985 .

[54]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[55]  Eric S. K. Yu,et al.  Do viewpoints lead to better conceptual models? An exploratory case study , 2005, 13th IEEE International Conference on Requirements Engineering (RE'05).

[56]  Dan Surry,et al.  Diffusion Theory and Instructional Technology , 1997 .

[57]  J. Cockcroft.  The process of technological innovation , 1965 .

[58]  L. G. Tornatzky,et al.  Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: A meta-analysis of findings , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[59]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Bringing non-adopters along: the challenge facing the PC industry , 2003, CACM.

[60]  E. Guba,et al.  Paradigmatic Controversies, Contradictions, and Emerging Confluences. , 2005 .

[61]  Raghu Garud,et al.  The innovation journey , 1999 .

[62]  Kalle Pajunen,et al.  Internationalisation: A co-evolutionary perspective , 2008 .

[63]  Gerald Trites,et al.  Director responsibility for IT governance , 2004, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[64]  S. Durlabhji.  The Influence of Confucianism and Zen on the Japanese Organization , 1990 .

[65]  P. Kotler.  The Elements of Social Action , 1971 .

[66]  Edward B. Roberts,et al.  Managing Invention and Innovation , 2007 .

[67]  Ed O'Donnell,et al.  Discussion of director responsibility for IT governance: a perspective on strategy , 2004, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[68]  Howard Falk,et al.  The Technological Society , 1965 .

[69]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  What Happens After ERP Implementation: Understanding the Impact of Interdependence and Differentiation on Plant-Level Outcomes , 2005, MIS Q..

[70]  Russell L. Ackoff,et al.  Re-Creating the Corporation: A Design of Organizations for the 21st Century , 1999 .

[71]  A. Feenberg.  The critical theory of technology , 1990 .

[72]  David Gefen,et al.  What Makes an ERP Implementation Relationship Worthwhile: Linking Trust Mechanisms and ERP Usefulness , 2004, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[73]  B. Flyvbjerg.  Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research , 2006, 1304.1186.

[74]  Kristin Braa,et al.  Balancing interpretation and intervention in information systems research: the action case approach , 1997 .

[75]  Alya Mlaiki,et al.  IT Offshoring: Views from Client and Vendor Perspectives , 2011, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Proj. Manag..

[76]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[77]  J. Ettlie.  Adequacy of Stage Models for Decisions on Adoption of Innovation , 1980 .

[78]  R. Zajonc,et al.  Affective and Cognitive Factors in Preferences , 1982 .

[79]  Robert A. Peterson,et al.  Models for innovation diffusion , 1985 .

[80]  Jan Pries-Heje,et al.  A multiple‐theory analysis of a diffusion of information technology case , 2001, Inf. Syst. J..

[81]  John Mingers,et al.  The paucity of multimethod research: a review of the information systems literature , 2003, Inf. Syst. J..

[83]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  6. Katz, E. Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications , 1956 .

[84]  M. Porter.  Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance , 1985 .

[85]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[86]  J. Creswell,et al.  Determining Validity in Qualitative Inquiry , 2000 .

[87]  Michael E. Raynor,et al.  The Innovator's Solution: Creating and Sustaining Successful Growth , 2003 .

[88]  William F. Ogburn,et al.  On Culture And Social Change , 1964 .

[89]  B. Ryan.  The diffusion of hybrid seed corn in two Iowa communities , 1943 .

[90]  David Zarefsky,et al.  Argumentation: The Study Of Effective Reasoning , 2001 .

[91]  N. Venkatraman,et al.  Beyond business process redesign: redefining Baxter's business network. , 1992, Sloan management review.

[92]  Jason Bennett Thatcher,et al.  Moving Beyond Intentions and Toward the Theory of Trying: Effects of Work Environment and Gender on Post-Adoption Information Technology Use , 2005, MIS Q..

[93]  D. Leonard-Barton,et al.  Managerial influence in the implementation of new technology , 1988 .

[94]  J. Gerring.  What Is a Case Study and What Is It Good for? , 2004, American Political Science Review.

[95]  John W. Satzinger,et al.  Object-Oriented Analysis and Design with the Unified Process , 2004 .

[96]  Marshall McLuhan,et al.  The medium is the message , 2005 .

[97]  N. Denzin,et al.  Introduction: The Discipline and Practice of Qualitative Research. , 2005 .

[98]  C. Whitbeck,et al.  A Realist Theory of Science. , 1977 .

[99]  R. Zmud,et al.  Information technology implementation research: a technological diffusion approach , 1990 .

[100]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Model of Adoption and Technology in Households: A Baseline Model Test and Extension Incorporating Household Life Cycle , 2005, MIS Q..

[101]  P. Weill,et al.  IT Governance , 2017 .

[102]  Frank M. Bass,et al.  A New Product Growth for Model Consumer Durables , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[103]  E. Rogers.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[104]  A. Meyer,et al.  Organizational Assimilation of Innovations: A Multi-Level Contextual Analysis , 1988 .

[105]  Yvonna S. Lincoln,et al.  Narrative authority vs. perjured testimony: Courage, vulnerability and truth , 2000 .

[106]  A. Goldman.  A priori warrant and naturalistic epistemology , 1999 .

[107]  Samia Khan,et al.  Redefining Case Study , 2007 .

[108]  J. Orr,et al.  Using Focus Groups to Research Sensitive Issues: Insights from Group Interviews on Nursing in the Northern Ireland “Troubles” , 2007 .

[109]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  Adoption intention in GSS: relative importance of beliefs , 1995, DATB.

[110]  A. Bruni.  The Social Shaping of Technology (2nd ed.) , 2003 .