Where evolvable production systems meet complexity science

Modern control approaches are either designated as complex or tackle complex systems. The concept of Evolv-able Production System (EPS) entails an iterative system design/control loop that supports system Adaptation and Evolution. Both concepts are borrowed from natural systems and, if properly instantiated and explored for the sake of production systems, may come to include a set of self-organizing and emergent process. One of the main challenges in EPS research is to frame these developing natural concepts and set them in a Mechatronic Agent-based framework. Such an approach also brings into the equation the possibility to handle and, potentially, exploit emergent behaviour. Inevitably, the coping of dynamically evolving setups with unforecasted behaviours raises the complexity issue quite substantially, hence the need to begin to analyse the EPS systems as Complex Systems. This paper provides an introduction to the context of Complex Systems, in particular about the self-organization and emergence components, and, from this integration, details how the bridging of the technological and functional challenges is being adopted within EPS. The work is based on assembly systems built within the framework of several European projects, including EUPASS, IPROMS and IDEAS. Finally, the article will provide with an initial evaluation and critical review of the complexity approach.

[1]  A. Galip Ulsoy,et al.  Trends and perspectives in flexible and reconfigurable manufacturing systems , 2002, J. Intell. Manuf..

[2]  Steven H. Strogatz,et al.  Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos , 2024 .

[3]  Duncan McFarlane,et al.  Rationales for Holonic Manufacturing Control , 1999 .

[4]  Moshe Sipper,et al.  Testing for Emergence in Artificial Life , 1999, ECAL.

[5]  Marie-Pierre Gleizes,et al.  Self-Organisation and Emergence in MAS: An Overview , 2006, Informatica.

[6]  Luis Ribeiro,et al.  The Meaningfulness of Consensus and Context in Diagnosing Evolvable Production Systems , 2010, DoCEIS.

[7]  Cristiano Castelfranchi,et al.  The theory of social functions: challenges for computational social science and multi-agent learning , 2001, Cognitive Systems Research.

[8]  Radu F. Babiceanu,et al.  Development and Applications of Holonic Manufacturing Systems: A Survey , 2006, J. Intell. Manuf..

[9]  D. Sornette Critical Phenomena in Natural Sciences: Chaos, Fractals, Selforganization and Disorder: Concepts and Tools , 2000 .

[10]  Hermann Haken,et al.  Information and Self-Organization: A Macroscopic Approach to Complex Systems , 2010 .

[11]  M. Onori,et al.  Evolvable Assembly Systems: Developments and Advances , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Symposium on Assembly and Manufacturing.

[12]  Tony Curzon Price,et al.  Emergence: From Chaos to Order by John H. Holland , 1998, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[13]  John H. Holland,et al.  Emergence. , 1997, Philosophica.

[14]  S. Franz,et al.  Critical Phenomena in Natural Sciences: Chaos, Fractals, Selforganization and Disorder: Concepts and Tools , 2004 .

[15]  Steven Johnson,et al.  Emergence: The Connected Lives of Ants, Brains, Cities, and Software , 2001 .

[16]  C. Adami,et al.  Self-organized criticality in living systems , 1994, adap-org/9401001.

[17]  F. Musharavati RECONFIGURABLE MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS , 2010 .

[18]  Tang,et al.  Self-organized criticality. , 1988, Physical review. A, General physics.

[19]  M. Onori,et al.  An architecture development approach for evolvable assembly systems , 2005, (ISATP 2005). The 6th IEEE International Symposium on Assembly and Task Planning: From Nano to Macro Assembly and Manufacturing, 2005..

[20]  Kanji Ueda,et al.  A Concept for Bionic Manufacturing Systems Based on DNA-type Information , 1992, PROLAMAT.

[21]  Mauro Onori,et al.  Evolvable Production Systems: An Integrated View on Recent Developments , 2009, DET.

[22]  Mauro Onori,et al.  Evolvable Assembly Systems : A New Paradigm? , 2002 .