A dynamical attractor governs beach response to storms

Sandbars are ubiquitous, yet not well understood beach features that change their position and shape in response to changing wave conditions. We propose and test a simple empirical model consisting of two coupled linear differential equations that represents bar dynamics in terms of wave forcing and two other state variables: (1) the mean cross‐shore bar position and (2) the alongshore variability about that mean. Model coefficients are constrained by fitting to a 2‐month data set, and the modeled behavior is examined with a stability analysis. The system is found to be stable and, hence, predictable. Rates of change of the bar position and its alongshore variability are found to be significantly coupled, such that prediction of one variable requires information about the other. The system response time is slow compared to the storm wave cycle such that the bar response continually orbits time‐varying equilibrium points in the state variable phase plane.

[1]  Choule J. Sonu,et al.  Three-Dimensional Beach Changes , 1973, The Journal of Geology.

[2]  W. James,et al.  A Markov Model for beach profile changes , 1973 .

[3]  Robert M. May,et al.  Simple mathematical models with very complicated dynamics , 1976, Nature.

[4]  Andrew D. Short,et al.  Three Dimensional Beach-Stage Model , 1979, The Journal of Geology.

[5]  L. Wright,et al.  Morphodynamic variability of surf zones and beaches: A synthesis , 1984 .

[6]  Edward N. Lorenz,et al.  Irregularity: a fundamental property of the atmosphere* , 1984 .

[7]  Andrew D. Short,et al.  Short-term changes in the morphodynamic states of beaches and surf zones: An empirical predictive model☆ , 1985 .

[8]  Robert A. Holman,et al.  Quantification of sand bar morphology: A video technique based on wave dissipation , 1989 .

[9]  R. Holman,et al.  The spatial and temporal variability of sand bar morphology , 1990 .

[10]  Jonathan D. Phillips,et al.  Qualitative Chaos in Geomorphic Systems, with an Example from Wetland Response to Sea Level Rise , 1992, The Journal of Geology.

[11]  Edward B. Thornton,et al.  Bar/trough generation on a natural beach , 1996 .

[12]  Nathaniel G. Plant,et al.  Intertidal beach profile estimation using video images , 1997 .

[13]  Steve Elgar,et al.  Observations of sand bar evolution on a natural beach , 1998 .

[14]  Nathaniel G. Plant,et al.  A simple model for interannual sandbar behavior , 1999 .

[15]  Giovanni Coco,et al.  A mechanism for the generation of wave‐driven rhythmic patterns in the surf zone , 2000 .

[16]  T. Başar,et al.  A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction Problems , 2001 .

[17]  Nathaniel G. Plant,et al.  Analysis of the scale of errors in nearshore bathymetric data , 2002 .

[18]  Kathelijne Mariken Wijnberg,et al.  Intersite comparison of interannual nearshore bar behavior , 2003 .

[19]  Marcel J. F. Stive,et al.  Impact of sea-level rise on the morphological equilibrium state of tidal inlets , 2003 .

[20]  Steve Elgar,et al.  Wave-Induced Sediment Transport and Sandbar Migration , 2003, Science.

[21]  B. G. Ruessink,et al.  Video observations of nearshore bar behaviour. Part 1: alongshore uniform variability , 2003 .

[22]  E. Thornton,et al.  Morphodynamic modeling of an embayed beach under wave group forcing , 2004 .

[23]  R. Holman,et al.  Morphodynamics of intermediate beaches: a video imaging and numerical modelling study , 2004 .

[24]  Robert A. Holman,et al.  Quantification of nearshore morphology based on video imaging , 2004 .

[25]  P. A. Newberger,et al.  Nearshore sandbar migration predicted by an eddy-diffusive boundary layer model , 2004 .