Diagnosing peri-implant disease using the tongue as a 24/7 detector

Our ability of screening broad communities for clinically asymptomatic diseases critically drives population health. Sensory chewing gums are presented targeting the tongue as 24/7 detector allowing diagnosis by “anyone, anywhere, anytime”. The chewing gum contains peptide sensors consisting of a protease cleavable linker in between a bitter substance and a microparticle. Matrix metalloproteinases in the oral cavity, as upregulated in peri-implant disease, specifically target the protease cleavable linker while chewing the gum, thereby generating bitterness for detection by the tongue. The peptide sensors prove significant success in discriminating saliva collected from patients with peri-implant disease versus clinically asymptomatic volunteers. Superior outcome is demonstrated over commercially available protease-based tests in saliva. “Anyone, anywhere, anytime” diagnostics are within reach for oral inflammation. Expanding this platform technology to other diseases in the future features this diagnostic as a massive screening tool potentially maximizing impact on population health.Early detection of gum inflammation caused by dental implants helps prevent tissue damage. Here, the authors present a peptide sensor that generates a bitter taste when cleaved by proteases present in peri-implant disease, embed it in a chewing gum, and compare the probe to existing sensors using patient saliva.

[1]  P. Cullis,et al.  Drug Delivery Systems: Entering the Mainstream , 2004, Science.

[2]  J. Glendinning,et al.  Is the bitter rejection response always adaptive? , 1994, Physiology & Behavior.

[3]  M. Nieminen,et al.  Salivary biomarkers of bacterial burden, inflammatory response, and tissue destruction in periodontitis. , 2014, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[4]  M. Behrens,et al.  Signaling in chemosensory systems , 2006, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences CMLS.

[5]  Peter Kleinebudde,et al.  Taste sensing systems (electronic tongues) for pharmaceutical applications. , 2011, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[6]  Alan C Spector,et al.  The bad taste of medicines: overview of basic research on bitter taste. , 2013, Clinical therapeutics.

[7]  Rewanthwar Swathi Latha,et al.  Electronic tongue: An analytical gustatory tool , 2012, Journal of advanced pharmaceutical technology & research.

[8]  Alberto Massarotti,et al.  Broad tuning of the human bitter taste receptor hTAS2R46 to various sesquiterpene lactones, clerodane and labdane diterpenoids, strychnine, and denatonium. , 2007, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[9]  T. Sorsa,et al.  Rapid Quantitative Chairside Test for Active MMP‐8 in Gingival Crevicular Fluid , 2007, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Gabriel A Kwong,et al.  Point-of-care diagnostics for noncommunicable diseases using synthetic urinary biomarkers and paper microfluidics , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  Craig S. Miller,et al.  Targeted salivary biomarkers for discrimination of periodontal health and disease(s) , 2015, Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol..

[12]  Ki Young Choi,et al.  Protease-Activated Drug Development , 2012, Theranostics.

[13]  T. Salo,et al.  Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) in oral diseases. , 2004, Oral diseases.

[14]  L. Golub,et al.  Characteristics of collagenase-2 from gingival crevicular fluid and peri-implant sulcular fluid in periodontitis and peri-implantitis patients: pilot study , 2008, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[15]  M. Bošković,et al.  Bone formation and reosseointegration in peri-implantitis defects following surgical implantation of rhBMP-2. , 1997, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[16]  C. Baird,et al.  The pilot study. , 2000, Orthopedic nursing.

[17]  P. Prasad,et al.  Nanochemistry and Nanomedicine for Nanoparticle-based Diagnostics and Therapy. , 2016, Chemical reviews.

[18]  T. Salo,et al.  Collagenases in Different Categories of Peri-implant Vertical Bone Loss , 2000, Journal of dental research.

[19]  C. Overall,et al.  Proteolytic host cell enzymes in gingival crevice fluid. , 2003, Periodontology 2000.

[20]  L. Meinel,et al.  Matrix Metalloproteinase Responsive Delivery of Myostatin Inhibitors , 2016, Pharmaceutical Research.

[21]  A. Drewnowski The science and complexity of bitter taste. , 2009, Nutrition reviews.

[22]  N. Lang,et al.  Comparative biology of chronic and aggressive periodontitis vs. peri-implantitis. , 2010, Periodontology 2000.

[23]  J. Enghild,et al.  Structural insights into triple-helical collagen cleavage by matrix metalloproteinase 1 , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  T. Salo,et al.  Cellular source, activation and inhibition of dental plaque collagenase. , 1995, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[25]  M. G. Finn,et al.  Click Chemistry: Diverse Chemical Function from a Few Good Reactions. , 2001, Angewandte Chemie.

[26]  T. Hoffmann,et al.  Full-mouth profile of active MMP-8 in periodontitis patients. , 2012, Journal of periodontal research.

[27]  L. Cantley,et al.  Determination of protease cleavage site motifs using mixture-based oriented peptide libraries , 2001, Nature Biotechnology.

[28]  G. Fields,et al.  Human matrix metalloproteinase specificity studies using collagen sequence-based synthetic peptides. , 1996, Biopolymers.

[29]  R. Huisgen 1,3-Dipolar Cycloadditions. Past and Future† , 1963 .

[30]  L. Meinel,et al.  Bio-orthogonal Immobilization of Fibroblast Growth Factor 2 for Spatial Controlled Cell Proliferation. , 2015, ACS biomaterials science & engineering.

[31]  T. Salo,et al.  Gingival crevicular fluid collagenase-2 (MMP-8) test stick for chair-side monitoring of periodontitis. , 2003, Journal of periodontal research.