Interaction of human osteoblasts with bioinert and bioactive ceramic substrates.

The objective of this study was to compare adhesion, replication, and differentiation of human osteoblasts (OPC1 cell line) on two different ceramic substrates: a bioinert alumina (A1(2)O(3)), and a bioactive hydroxyapatite (HAp). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and confocal scanning microscopy were used to assess production and distribution of specific osteoblast proteins. Cells grew readily on HAp and alumina. On alumina and HAp, OPC1 cells produced distinctive cell-to-cell and cell-to-scaffold filopodia and microextensions. OPC1 cells proliferated faster on HAp than on alumina substrates. Adhesion was further assessed by observing production of the protein vinculin. On alumina, vinculin was detected throughout the cytoplasm, with some peripheral punctate regions. On HAp, OPC1 cells developed few punctate peripheral regions of vinculin; rather, the protein was strongly localized within the cytoplasm. Finally, we measured accumulation of the marker osteopontin (OPN). OPN was first detectable on day 5 and increased through day 11 of culture on alumina. OPC1 cells on HAp produced substantial amounts of OPN beginning at day 5, with apparent secretion from the cells by culture day 11. These results suggest that the function of osteoblasts is strongly affected by the properties of ceramic surfaces, and rapid attachment of osteoblasts may result in earlier differentiation on HAp than on alumina.

[1]  L L Hench,et al.  Surface-active biomaterials. , 1984, Science.

[2]  M. Yoshinari,et al.  Substrate affects the initial attachment and subsequent behavior of human osteoblastic cells (Saos-2). , 2001, Biomaterials.

[3]  C. Giachelli,et al.  Osteopontin: a versatile regulator of inflammation and biomineralization. , 2000, Matrix biology : journal of the International Society for Matrix Biology.

[4]  H. Uludaǧ,et al.  Establishing an Immortalized Human Osteoprecursor Cell Line: OPC1 , 1999, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[5]  A. Bandyopadhyay,et al.  CaO--P2O5--Na2O-based sintering additives for hydroxyapatite (HAp) ceramics. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[6]  C. Piconi,et al.  Growth of osteoblast-like cells on porous hydroxyapatite ceramics: an in vitro study. , 2002, Biomolecular engineering.

[7]  M. Noda,et al.  Osteopontin expression and function: Role in bone remodeling , 1998, Journal of cellular biochemistry. Supplement.

[8]  C. R. Howlett,et al.  Effect of surface chemical modification of bioceramic on phenotype of human bone-derived cells. , 1999, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[9]  Larry L Hench,et al.  Third-Generation Biomedical Materials , 2002, Science.

[10]  F. Nakamura Biochemical, electron microscopic and immunohistological observations of cationic detergent-extracted cells: detection and improved preservation of microextensions and ultramicroextensions , 2001, BMC Cell Biology.

[11]  F. Monchau,et al.  In vitro studies of human and rat osteoclast activity on hydroxyapatite, beta-tricalcium phosphate, calcium carbonate. , 2002, Biomolecular engineering.

[12]  C. Praul,et al.  Confocal imaging and timing of secretion of matrix proteins by osteoblasts derived from avian long bone. , 2000, Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part A, Molecular & integrative physiology.

[13]  E. Zamir,et al.  Molecular complexity and dynamics of cell-matrix adhesions. , 2001, Journal of cell science.

[14]  S. Kasugai,et al.  Evaluation of implant materials (hydroxyapatite, glass-ceramics, titanium) in rat bone marrow stromal cell culture. , 1996, Biomaterials.

[15]  Y. Missirlis,et al.  Assessment of techniques used in calculating cell-material interactions. , 2002, Biomolecular engineering.