On the applicability of multi-surface, two-surface and non-linear kinematic hardening models in multiaxial fatigue

In this work, a comparison between NLK and Mroz-Garud’s multi-surface formulations is presented. A unified common notation is introduced to describe the involved equations, showing that the Mroz-Garud model can be regarded as a particular case of the NLK formulation. It is also shown that the classic two-surface model, which is an unconventional simplified plasticity model based on the translation of only two surfaces, can also be represented using this formulation. Such common notation allows a direct quantitative comparison among multi-surface, two-surface, and NLK hardening models.

[1]  Yannis F. Dafalias,et al.  Plastic Internal Variables Formalism of Cyclic Plasticity , 1976 .

[2]  Hans-Werner Ziegler A Modification of Prager's Hardening Rule , 1959 .

[3]  N. Ohno,et al.  Kinematic hardening rules with critical state of dynamic recovery, part I: formulation and basic features for ratchetting behavior , 1993 .

[4]  J. Chaboche,et al.  Modelization of the Strain Memory Effect on the Cyclic Hardening of 316 Stainless Steel , 1979 .

[5]  G. Cailletaud,et al.  Numerical techniques for cyclic plasticity at variable temperature , 1986 .

[6]  Huseyin Sehitoglu,et al.  Modeling of cyclic ratchetting plasticity, part i: Development of constitutive relations , 1996 .

[7]  Y. Garud A New Approach to the Evaluation of Fatigue Under Multiaxial Loadings , 1981 .

[8]  Marco Antonio Meggiolaro,et al.  A general class of non-linear kinematic models to predict mean stress relaxation and multiaxial ratcheting in fatigue problems – Part II: Generalized surface translation rule ☆ , 2016 .

[9]  C. O. Frederick,et al.  A mathematical representation of the multiaxial Bauschinger effect , 2007 .

[10]  J. Chaboche,et al.  On the Plastic and Viscoplastic Constitutive Equations—Part I: Rules Developed With Internal Variable Concept , 1983 .

[11]  Tasnim Hassan,et al.  Kinematic hardening rules in uncoupled modeling for multiaxial ratcheting simulation , 2001 .

[12]  Zenon Mróz,et al.  On the description of anisotropic workhardening , 1967 .

[13]  Xu Chen,et al.  Modified kinematic hardening rule for multiaxial ratcheting prediction , 2004 .

[14]  P. Robinet,et al.  Experimental study and phenomenological modelization of ratchet under uniaxial and biaxial loading on an austenitic stainless steel , 1995 .

[15]  Huseyin Sehitoglu,et al.  Modeling of cyclic ratchetting plasticity, Part II: Comparison of model simulations with experiments , 1996 .

[16]  Fusahito Yoshida,et al.  A model of large-strain cyclic plasticity describing the Bauschinger effect and workhardening stagnation , 2002 .

[17]  Nobutada Ohno,et al.  Kinematic hardening rules with critical state of dynamic recovery, part II: Application to experiments of ratchetting behavior , 1993 .

[18]  R. D. Krieg A Practical Two Surface Plasticity Theory , 1975 .

[19]  Xu Chen,et al.  On the Ohno–Wang kinematic hardening rules for multiaxial ratcheting modeling of medium carbon steel , 2005 .

[20]  Nobutada Ohno,et al.  Transformation of a nonlinear kinematic hardening rule to a multisurface form under isothermal and nonisothermal conditions , 1991 .

[21]  William Prager,et al.  Recent Developments in the Mathematical Theory of Plasticity , 1949 .

[22]  Huseyin Sehitoglu,et al.  Comments on the Mroz multiple surface type plasticity models , 1996 .

[23]  Peter Kurath,et al.  Characteristics of the Armstrong-Frederick type plasticity models , 1996 .