On the most convenient mixed strategies in a mixed strategist dynamics approach for load management of electric vehicle fleets

This manuscript explores the selection of appropriate mixed strategies (MSs) in a Mixed Strategist Dynamics (MSD) application for load management of Plug-in Electric Vehicle (PEV) fleets. This selection is based on the convenience of PEV owners, aiming to choose those MSs that privilege early high (or fast) charging rates when it is possible. The previously published MSD and Maximum Entropy principle (MSD-MEP) approach is revised and illustrated with several examples, specially in the context of selection of MSs. This revision allows a wider understanding of the method, and aims to inspire new contributions on domains where distributed optimization methods are pertinent. Results obtained without any management structure are compared to those obtained with the MSD-MEP approach under different scenarios, where full sets of MSs and reduced sets of convenient MSs are applied. The performance of the method, using conveniently reduced sets of MSs, is tested with real historical active power measurements, provided by the SOREA utility grid company in the region of Savoie, France.

[1]  Damian Flynn,et al.  Local Versus Centralized Charging Strategies for Electric Vehicles in Low Voltage Distribution Systems , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[2]  Josef Hofbauer,et al.  The theory of evolution and dynamical systems , 1988 .

[3]  Cristina Olaverri-Monreal,et al.  How Electric Vehicles Affect Driving Behavioral Patterns , 2014, IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine.

[4]  Seddik Bacha,et al.  An Electric Vehicle Load Management Application of the Mixed Strategist Dynamics and the Maximum Entropy Principle , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[5]  S. Bacha,et al.  Low-Voltage Transformer Loss-of-Life Assessments for a High Penetration of Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles (PHEVs) , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[6]  Guoqing Xu,et al.  Regulated Charging of Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles for Minimizing Load Variance in Household Smart Microgrid , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[7]  Marc Harper,et al.  Information Geometry and Evolutionary Game Theory , 2009, ArXiv.

[8]  Jeff Frolik,et al.  Packetized plug-in electric vehicle charge management , 2014, 2014 IEEE PES General Meeting | Conference & Exposition.

[9]  Seddik Bacha,et al.  Rule-Based Charging of Plug-in Electric Vehicles (PEVs): Impacts on the Aging Rate of Low-Voltage Transformers , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[10]  Josef Hofbauer,et al.  Evolutionary Games and Population Dynamics , 1998 .

[11]  Guy Lebanon,et al.  Metric learning for text documents , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[12]  Ju Bin Song,et al.  Optimal charging and discharging for multiple PHEVs with demand side management in vehicle-to-building , 2012, Journal of Communications and Networks.

[13]  Ling Guan,et al.  Optimal Scheduling for Charging and Discharging of Electric Vehicles , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[14]  Seddik Bacha,et al.  Optimal management and integration of electric vehicles to the grid: Dynamic programming and game theory approach , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology (ICIT).

[15]  J. Driesen,et al.  The Impact of Charging Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles on a Residential Distribution Grid , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[16]  Mike Barnes,et al.  The Impact of Transport Electrification on Electrical Networks , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[17]  Benoit Robyns,et al.  The feasibility of the ancillary services for Vehicle-to-grid technology , 2014, 11th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM14).