Managing Design Process Complexity: A Value-of-Information Based Approach for Scale and Decision Decoupling

Design processes for multiscale, multifunctional systems are inherently complex due to the interactions between scales, functional requirements, and the resulting design decisions. While complex design processes that consider all interactions lead to better designs; simpler design processes where some interactions are ignored are faster and resource efficient. In order to determine the right level of simplification of design processes, designers are faced with the following questions: a) how should complex design-processes be simplified without affecting the resulting product performance? and b) how can designers quantify and evaluate the appropriateness of different design process alternatives? In this paper, the first question is addressed by introducing a method for determining the appropriate level of simplification of design processes — specifically through decoupling of scales and decisions in a multiscale problem. The method is based on three constructs: interaction patterns to model design processes, intervals to model uncertainty resulting from decoupling of scales and decisions, and value of information based metrics to measure the impact of simplification on the final design outcome. The second question is addressed by introducing a value-of-information based metric called improvement potential for quantifying the appropriateness of design process alternatives from the standpoint of product design requirements. The metric embodies quantitatively the potential for improvement in the achievement of product requirements by adding more information for design decision making. The method is illustrated via a datacenter cooling system design example.Copyright © 2007 by ASME

[1]  Jitesh H. Panchal,et al.  A framework for simulation-based integrated design of multiscale products and design processes , 2005 .

[2]  Kenneth J. Arrow,et al.  Studies in Resource Allocation Processes: Appendix: An optimality criterion for decision-making under ignorance , 1977 .

[3]  Andrew Kusiak,et al.  Decomposition of the Design Process , 1993 .

[4]  Jaroslaw Sobieszczanski-Sobieski,et al.  OPTIMIZATION OF COUPLED SYSTEMS: A CRITICAL OVERVIEW OF APPROACHES , 1994 .

[5]  Christina Bloebaum,et al.  Development of CASCADE - A multidisciplinary design test simulator , 1996 .

[6]  Christiaan J. J. Paredis,et al.  Designing Design Processes in Product Lifecycle Management: Research Issues and Strategies , 2004 .

[7]  Carolyn Conner Seepersad,et al.  The utility-based compromise decision support problem with applications in product platform design , 2001 .

[8]  Charles N. Calvano,et al.  Systems engineering in an age of complexity , 2004 .

[9]  Christina Bloebaum,et al.  Total derivative-based coupling suspension for system reduction in complex design , 1996 .

[10]  Simon Li,et al.  Model-Based Decomposition Using Non-Binary Dependency Analysis and Heuristic Partitioning Analysis , 2006, DAC 2006.

[11]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  Robust Design of Air-Cooled Server Cabinets for Thermal Efficiency , 2005 .

[12]  Yaneer Bar-Yam,et al.  Dynamics Of Complex Systems , 2019 .

[13]  Kemper Lewis,et al.  Collaborative, sequential, and isolated decisions in design , 1997 .

[14]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  Digital Interfaces: The Key to Effective Decision-Making in Distributed Collaborative Design and Manufacturing , 2002 .

[15]  Andrew Kusiak,et al.  A structured approach for analysis of design processes , 1995 .

[16]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[17]  Simon Li,et al.  Analysis of Decomposability and Complexity for Design Problems in the Context of Decomposition , 2005, DAC 2004.

[18]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Patterns of Product Development Interactions , 2002 .

[19]  Christina Bloebaum,et al.  Development of multiple cycle coupling suspension in the optimization of complex systems , 2001 .

[20]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Integration analysis of product decompositions , 1994 .

[21]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  ON A DECISION SUPPORT FRAMEWORK FOR DISTRIBUTED COLLABORATIVE DESIGN AND MANUFACTURE , 2002 .

[22]  Christina Bloebaum,et al.  NON-HIERARCHIC SYSTEM DECOMPOSITION IN STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION , 1992 .

[23]  D. Grose,et al.  Reengineering the aircraft design process , 1994 .

[24]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  Designing evolving families of products using the utility-based compromise decision support problem , 2005 .

[25]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  Designing Design Processes in Decision-Based Concurrent Engineering , 1991 .

[26]  Christina Bloebaum,et al.  Application of global sensitivity equations in multidisciplinary aircraft synthesis , 1990 .

[27]  Andrew Kusiak,et al.  Concurrent engineering: decomposition and scheduling of design activities , 1990 .

[28]  Christiaan J. J. Paredis,et al.  A value-of-information based approach to simulation model refinement , 2008 .

[29]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  Computer-Based Multiprojective Herarchical Design of Spacecraft Thermal Control Systems , 1989 .

[30]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  Modelling design processes: a conceptual, decision-based perspective , 1995 .

[31]  Christina Bloebaum,et al.  Ordering design tasks based on coupling strengths , 1994 .

[32]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  A systems-based approach for integrated design of materials, products and design process chains , 2007 .

[33]  Jaroslaw Sobieszczanskisobieski,et al.  On the sensitivity of complex, internally coupled systems , 1988 .

[34]  Christina Bloebaum,et al.  Coupling strength-based system reduction for complex engineering design , 1995 .

[35]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  THE COMPROMISE DECISION SUPPORT PROBLEM AND THE ADAPTIVE LINEAR PROGRAMMING ALGORITHM , 1998 .