Development of fluency and revision in L1 and L2 writing in Swedish High School years eight and nine

In this paper we use keystroke logging to examine the development of fluency and revision in high school L1 Swedish and L2 English writing. Each writer wrote one text in English and one in Swedish in each year of the study. Using a combination of statistical and automatic analyses of the keystroke log, we attempted to investigate: i) how the on-line writing process in terms of revising, pausing and fluency in first and second language writing changes over time, ii) whether there are on-line writing process variables which can be identified as contributing to text improvement, and iii) whether there are any aspects of L1 writing which can be identified as contributing to L2 writing and learning processes and which may form part of a teaching programme. Previous studies of L2 writers have attested to changes in fluency, pause and revision behaviour, and amount of text produced, although associations with the quality of the final output are not clearly supported. The within-writer comparison of this study addresses differences in fluency, pause and revision behaviour between L1 and L2 writing. A regression analysis looking at quality and two types of revision (Form, and Conceptual) found that form revision frequency was related to the language of writing and that conceptual revision frequency was dependent on linguistic experience rather than on language. The findings suggest that conceptual revision and writing skills are transferred from the L1 to the L2, and that these skills should be taught accordingly.

[1]  Gert Rijlaarsdam,et al.  The study of revision as a writing process and a learning-to-write process , 2004 .

[2]  William Miller New Sentence Tactics Through Predication. , 1971 .

[3]  Marie Stevenson,et al.  Revising in two languages: A multi-dimensional comparison of online writing revisions in L1 and FL☆ , 2006 .

[4]  Eva Lindgren,et al.  The Psycholinguistic Dimension in Second Language Writing: Opportunities for Research and Pedagogy Using Computer Keystroke Logging , 2008 .

[5]  L. Chanquoy,et al.  How to make it easier for children to revise their writing: a study of text revision from 3rd to 5th grades. , 2001, The British journal of educational psychology.

[6]  R. Abbott,et al.  Role of mechanics in composing of elementary school students: A new methodological approach. , 1997 .

[7]  J. Hayes A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. , 1996 .

[8]  Huub van den Bergh,et al.  Effects of thinking aloud on writing processes , 1996 .

[9]  Eva Lindgren,et al.  Writing and the Analysis of Revision: An Overview , 2006, Computer Key-Stroke Logging and Writing.

[10]  J. Hayes,et al.  A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing , 1981, College Composition & Communication.

[11]  D. McCutchen Knowledge, Processing, and Working Memory: Implications for a Theory of Writing , 2000 .

[12]  Marianne Phinney,et al.  Computers, revision, and ESL writers: The role of experience , 1993 .

[13]  D. McCutchen A capacity theory of writing: Working memory in composition , 1996 .

[14]  P. Snellings,et al.  First Language and Second Language Writing: The Role of Linguistic Knowledge, Speed of Processing, and Metacognitive Knowledge , 2003 .

[15]  Kirk P. H. Sullivan,et al.  Keystroke logging : an introduction , 2006 .

[16]  Karen Whalen,et al.  L1 and L2 Writers' Strategic and Linguistic Knowledge: A Model of Multiple‐Level Discourse Processing , 1995 .

[17]  S. Graham,et al.  The Role of Self-Regulation and Transcription Skills in Writing and Writing Development , 2000 .

[18]  G. Rijlaarsdam,et al.  The study of revision as a writing process and as a learning-to-write process. Two Prospective Research Agendas , 2003 .

[19]  J. Hayes,et al.  Fluency in Writing , 2001 .

[20]  Ludo Verhoeven,et al.  Transfer in Bilingual Development: The Linguistic Interdependence Hypothesis Revisited , 1994 .

[21]  Victoria Johansson,et al.  What Keystroke Logging can Reveal about Writing , 2006, Computer Key-Stroke Logging and Writing.

[22]  Eva Lindgren,et al.  Stimulated Recall as a Trigger for Increasing Noticing and Language Awareness in the L2 Writing Classroom: A Case Study of Two Young Female Writers , 2003 .

[23]  Ann Matsuhashi,et al.  Pausing and Planning: The Tempo of Written Discourse Production , 1981 .

[24]  Eva Lindgren,et al.  Self‐assessment in autonomous computer‐aided second language writing , 2002 .

[25]  H. Jacobs Testing Esl Composition: A Practical Approach , 1981 .

[26]  Susan D. Bosher,et al.  The composing processes of three Southeast Asian writers at the post-secondary level: An exploratory study , 1998 .