‘$100 Is Not Much To You’: Open Science and neglected accessibilities for scientific research in Africa

Abstract The Open Science (OS) movement promises nothing less than a revolution in the availability of scientific knowledge around the globe. By removing barriers to online data and encouraging publication in Open Access formats and Open Data archives, OS seeks to expand the role, reach and value of research. The promises of OS imply a set of expectations about what different publics hope to gain from research, how accountability and participation can be enhanced, and what makes science public in the first place. This paper presents empirical material from fieldwork undertaken in (bio)chemistry laboratories in Kenya and South Africa to examine the extent to which these ideals can be realized in a sub-Saharan context. To analyse the challenges African researchers face in making use of freely available data, we draw from Amartya Sen’s Capabilities Approach. His theorisations of ‘conversion factors’ helps to understand how seemingly minor economic and social contingencies can hamper the production and (re-)use of online data. In contrast to initiatives that seek to make more data available, we suggest the need to facilitate a more egalitarian engagement with online data resources.

[1]  M. Turshen Development as Freedom , 2001 .

[2]  Paul DiMaggio,et al.  From the 'digital divide' to 'digital inequality' , 2001 .

[3]  Paul DiMaggio,et al.  From the 'Digital Divide' to 'Digital Inequality': Studying Internet Use as Penetration Increases , 2001 .

[4]  Lisa J. Servon Bridging the Digital Divide , 2002 .

[5]  Dmitry Polikanov,et al.  Africa and ICT: A Chance for Breakthrough? , 2003 .

[6]  Neil Selwyn,et al.  Reconsidering Political and Popular Understandings of the Digital Divide , 2004, New Media Soc..

[7]  Richard K. Johnson Open Access , 2005 .

[8]  Wesley Shrum,et al.  Reagency of the Internet, or, How I Became a Guest for Science , 2005 .

[9]  Ricardo B. Duque,et al.  Collaboration Paradox , 2005 .

[10]  N. Marres,et al.  Recipe for tracing the fate of issues and their publics on the Web , 2005 .

[11]  Radhamany Sooryamoorthy,et al.  When do scientists “adopt” the Internet? Dimensions of connectivity in developing areas , 2005, Scientometrics.

[12]  Ian Scoones,et al.  Science and citizens : globalization and the challenge of engagement , 2006 .

[13]  C. Whitty,et al.  Guidelines and mindlines: why do clinical staff over-diagnose malaria in Tanzania? A qualitative study , 2008, Malaria Journal.

[14]  R. Bunton Public health and public involvement , 2008 .

[15]  B. Library Patterns of information use and exchange: case studies of researchers in the life sciences , 2009 .

[16]  Ricardo B. Duque,et al.  Internet practice and professional networks in Chilean science: Dependency or progress? , 2009, Scientometrics.

[17]  Mark Tomlinson,et al.  The use of mobile phones as a data collection tool: A report from a household survey in South Africa , 2009, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[18]  Sabina Leonelli,et al.  How Well Do Facts Travel?: Packaging Small Facts for Re-Use: Databases in Model Organism Biology , 2010 .

[19]  W. Shrum,et al.  Professional networks, scientific collaboration, and publication productivity in resource-constrained research institutions in a developing country , 2011 .

[20]  Jennifer C Molloy,et al.  The Open Knowledge Foundation: Open Data Means Better Science , 2011, PLoS biology.

[21]  Audie A Atienza,et al.  Mobile health technology evaluation: the mHealth evidence workshop. , 2013, American journal of preventive medicine.

[22]  Sabina Leonelli,et al.  Why the Current Insistence on Open Access to Scientific Data? Big Data, Knowledge Production, and the Political Economy of Contemporary Biology , 2013 .

[23]  James Wilsdon,et al.  Why should we promote public engagement with science? , 2014, Public understanding of science.

[24]  F. V. Schalkwyk Zero proximity : increasing the online visibility of academics at the University of Mauritius , 2014 .

[25]  A. Molina-Ruiz,et al.  [Bridging the Digital Divide]. , 2016, Actas dermo-sifiliograficas.