for a climate compatible air transport system

Aviation affects the Earth’s atmosphere and radiative balance through the emission of greenhouse gases, greenhouse gas precursors, aerosols, contrails and induced cirrus cloudiness. The resulting climate impact is a response of the complex interactions between the amount and type of emitted constituents, their geographical position, altitude and time of emission as well as the actual weather and climate situation. In 2005 aviation accounted for 3.5 % of the global anthropogenic radiative forcing (excluding the impact of contrail cirrus clouds). As the global air traffic is predicted to grow approx. 5% per year, the development of a climate compatible air transport system is of increasing importance for society and science. To achieve this goal, different technological and operational options can be applied to reduce the climate impact by air travel. The range of possibilities is wide, including new propulsion concepts such as open rotors or intercooler recuperative engine cycles, improved combustion chambers for low NOX and soot, novel aircraft configurations such as Blended Wing Bodies, innovative subsystem architectures for minimal engine cycle disturbance through secondary power off take and operational procedures such as multi-step operations and changed cruise altitudes for contrail avoidance. In order to provide a solid basis for decision and policy makers, the remaining uncertainties in climate modeling have to be reduced and the different options and their interrelations have to be assessed in a reliable way. To catch all relevant effects of the couple d disciplines, sophisticated numerical models for climate response, mission calculation, propulsion, aircraft subsystems and overall aircraft design are combined to an integrated si mulation and assessment chain. In addition, further efforts are made to reduce remaining uncertainties in modeling emissions and their corresponding climate impact. This complex and multidisciplinary task further requires the contribution of experts from the included areas to ensure a secure evaluation of the obtained results. Here we present such an integrated approach as it is applied within the DLR project Climate compatible Air Transport System (CATS).

[1]  Klaus Gierens,et al.  A review of various strategies for contrail avoidance , 2008 .

[2]  Volker Grewe,et al.  AirClim: an efficient tool for climate evaluation of aircraft technology , 2008 .

[3]  Robert Sausen,et al.  The impact of cruise altitude on contrails and related radiative forcing , 2005 .

[4]  Piers M. Forster,et al.  It is premature to include non-CO2 effects of aviation in emission trading schemes , 2006 .

[5]  Regina Egelhofer,et al.  Minimizing Impact on Climate in Aircraft Design , 2007 .

[6]  Alexander Koch,et al.  Climate impact evaluation as part of aircraft pre-design , 2009 .

[7]  U. Schumann On conditions for contrail formation from aircraft exhausts , 1996 .

[8]  Regina Egelhofer,et al.  Aircraft Design Driven by Climate Change , 2008 .

[9]  R. Sausen,et al.  Climate impact of supersonic air traffic: an approach to optimize a potential future supersonic fleet – results from the EU-project SCENIC , 2007 .

[10]  Keith P. Shine,et al.  Corrigendum to “It is premature to include non-CO2 effects of aviation in emission trading schemes”: [Atmos. Environ. 40 (2006) 1117–1121] , 2007 .

[11]  Ulrich Schumann,et al.  Formation, properties and climatic effects of contrails , 2005 .

[12]  A. Lefebvre Gas Turbine Combustion , 1983 .

[13]  J. E. Green,et al.  The potential for reducing the impact of aviation on climate , 2009, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[14]  Gertjan Looye,et al.  Integration and application of a tool chain for environmental analysis of aircraft flight trajectories , 2009 .

[15]  Robert Sausen,et al.  Estimates of the Climate Response to Aircraft CO2 and NOx Emissions Scenarios , 2000 .

[16]  J. Penner,et al.  Aviation and the Global Atmosphere , 1999 .