Comparison of global and mode of action-based models for aquatic toxicity

The ability to estimate aquatic toxicity is a critical need for ecological risk assessment and chemical regulation. The consensus in the literature is that mode of action (MOA) based toxicity models yield the most toxicologically meaningful and, theoretically, the most accurate results. In this study, a two-step prediction methodology was developed to estimate acute aquatic toxicity from molecular structure. In the first step, one-against-the-rest linear discriminant analysis (LDA) models were used to predict the MOA. The LDA models were able to predict the MOA with 85.8–88.8% accuracy for broad and specific MOAs, respectively. In the second step, a multiple linear regression (MLR) model corresponding to the predicted MOA was used to predict the acute aquatic toxicity value. The MOA-based approach was found to yield similar external prediction accuracy (r2 = 0.529–0.632) to a single global MLR model (r2 = 0.551–0.562) fit to the entire training set. Overall, the global hierarchical clustering approach yielded a higher combination of accuracy and prediction coverage (r2 = 0.572, coverage = 99.3%) than the other approaches. Utilizing multiple two-dimensional chemical descriptors in MLR models yielded comparable results to using only the octanol–water partition coefficient (log Kow).

[1]  Ruisheng Zhang,et al.  Comparative classification study of toxicity mechanisms using support vector machines and radial basis function neural networks , 2005 .

[2]  Johann Gasteiger,et al.  Use of Structure Descriptors To Discriminate between Modes of Toxic Action of Phenols , 2005, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[3]  Peter C Jurs,et al.  Assessing the reliability of a QSAR model's predictions. , 2005, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[4]  Douglas M. Young,et al.  Prediction of Aquatic Toxicity Mode of Action Using Linear Discriminant and Random Forest Models , 2013, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[5]  J. Contrera,et al.  Predicting the carcinogenic potential of pharmaceuticals in rodents using molecular structural similarity and E-state indices. , 2003, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[6]  Johann Gasteiger,et al.  Comparison of Different Classification Methods Applied to a Mode of Toxic Action Data Set , 2004 .

[7]  Mark T D Cronin,et al.  Comparative assessment of methods to develop QSARs for the prediction of the toxicity of phenols to Tetrahymena pyriformis. , 2002, Chemosphere.

[8]  Roberto Todeschini,et al.  Handbook of Molecular Descriptors , 2002 .

[9]  Tomas Öberg,et al.  A general structure-property relationship to predict the enthalpy of vaporisation at ambient temperatures , 2007 .

[10]  Luca Pireddu,et al.  Support Vector Machine (SVM) as Alternative Tool to Assign Acute Aquatic Toxicity Warning Labels to Chemicals , 2010, Molecular informatics.

[11]  L. Hall,et al.  Molecular Structure Description: The Electrotopological State , 1999 .

[12]  Alexander Tropsha,et al.  Quantitative structure-activity relationship modeling of rat acute toxicity by oral exposure. , 2009, Chemical research in toxicology.

[13]  A. Ghose,et al.  Prediction of Hydrophobic (Lipophilic) Properties of Small Organic Molecules Using Fragmental Methods: An Analysis of ALOGP and CLOGP Methods , 1998 .

[14]  Colin R. Janssen,et al.  Development and validation of a quantitative structure–activity relationship for chronic narcosis to fish , 2013, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[15]  P. Jurs,et al.  Prediction of fathead minnow acute toxicity of organic compounds from molecular structure. , 1999, Chemical research in toxicology.

[16]  G. Veith,et al.  Relationships between descriptors for hydrophobicity and soft electrophilicity in predicting toxicity. , 1993, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[17]  Francisco Torrens,et al.  A novel approach to predict aquatic toxicity from molecular structure. , 2008, Chemosphere.

[18]  Alexander Tropsha,et al.  Novel Variable Selection Quantitative Structure-Property Relationship Approach Based on the k-Nearest-Neighbor Principle , 2000, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[19]  Roberto Todeschini,et al.  Prediction of Acute Aquatic Toxicity toward Daphnia Magna by using the GA-kNN Method , 2014, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.

[20]  T W Schultz,et al.  Structure-toxicity relationships for phenols to Tetrahymena pyriformis. , 1996, Chemosphere.

[21]  Henrik Boström,et al.  Discrimination between modes of toxic action of phenols using rule based methods , 2006, Molecular Diversity.

[22]  Paola Gramatica,et al.  Statistically Validated QSARs, Based on Theoretical Descriptors, for Modeling Aquatic Toxicity of Organic Chemicals in Pimephales promelas (Fathead Minnow) , 2005, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[23]  Tomas Oberg.  A QSAR for baseline toxicity: validation, domain of application, and prediction. , 2004, Chemical research in toxicology.

[24]  Shijin Ren.  Predicting three narcosis mechanisms of aquatic toxicity. , 2002, Toxicology letters.

[25]  J. Brian Gray,et al.  Introduction to Linear Regression Analysis , 2002, Technometrics.

[26]  Artem Cherkasov.  Inductive QSAR Descriptors. Distinguishing Compounds with Antibacterial Activity by Artificial Neural Networks , 2005 .

[27]  H. Könemann.  Quantitative structure-activity relationships in fish toxicity studies. Part 1: relationship for 50 industrial pollutants. , 1981, Toxicology.

[28]  Manuela Pavan,et al.  Review of (Quantitative) Structure–Activity Relationships for Acute Aquatic Toxicity , 2008 .

[29]  Ralph Kühne,et al.  Stepwise discrimination between four modes of toxic action of phenols in the Tetrahymena pyriformis assay. , 2003, Chemical research in toxicology.

[30]  Mark T. D. Cronin,et al.  Multivariate Discrimination between Modes of Toxic Action of Phenols , 2002 .

[31]  Ruisheng Zhang,et al.  An Accurate QSPR Study of O-H Bond Dissociation Energy in Substituted Phenols Based on Support Vector Machines , 2004, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[32]  R Benigni,et al.  QSARS of mutagens and carcinogens: two case studies illustrating problems in the construction of models for noncongeneric chemicals. , 1996, Mutation research.

[33]  Monika Nendza,et al.  Discriminating Toxicant Classes by Mode of Action: 2. Physico‐Chemical Descriptors , 2000 .

[34]  D. Mackay,et al.  “Volume fraction” correlation for narcosis in aquatic organisms: The key role of partitioning , 1988 .

[35]  T M Martin,et al.  Prediction of the acute toxicity (96-h LC50) of organic compounds to the fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas) using a group contribution method. , 2001, Chemical research in toxicology.

[36]  Gerald J. Niemi,et al.  A comparative study of molecular similarity, statistical, and neural methods for predicting toxic modes of action , 1998 .

[37]  Yiyu Cheng,et al.  Mode of action-based local QSAR modeling for the prediction of acute toxicity in the fathead minnow. , 2007, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[38]  Wencong Lu,et al.  Predicting toxic action mechanisms of phenols using AdaBoost Learner , 2009 .

[39]  Paul Harten,et al.  A Hierarchical Clustering Methodology for the Estimation of Toxicity , 2008, Toxicology mechanisms and methods.

[40]  Ş. Niculescu,et al.  Using probabilistic neural networks to model the toxicity of chemicals to the fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas): a study based on 865 compounds. , 1999, Chemosphere.

[41]  C. Russom,et al.  Predicting modes of toxic action from chemical structure: Acute toxicity in the fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas) , 1997 .

[42]  J. Hermens,et al.  Classifying environmental pollutants , 1992 .