Single-sensor processing and sensor fusion of GPR and EMI data for land mine detection

In our previous work, we have shown theoretically that model-based Bayesian approach to the detection of landmines affords significant performance gains over standard thresholding techniques. These performance gains hold for both time- and frequency-domain electromagnetic induction (EMI) sensors. Our methodology merges physical models of the evoked target response with a probabilistic description of the clutter. Under a specific set of assumptions, our technique provides both an optimal detection algorithm and performance evaluation measures expressed as probability of detection and probability of false alarm. This approach also provides a formal framework for incorporating target and/or environmental uncertainties into the processing algorithms. The significant performance improvements observed theoretically have been verified on both time-domain and frequency-domain EMI data collected in the field. In this paper, we review our previous theoretical work, and we use actual data collected in the field to illustrate the improvement obtained by appropriately accounting for environmental uncertainties. We present new results in which a suboptimal processor provides nearly identical performance to that of the optimal processor but with much greater computational efficiency. We also present result that indicate that such an approach can be applied successfully to ground penetrating radar data. Specifically, we consider data taken by the BRTRC/Wichmannn system. In addition to processing the data from each type of sensor individually, as well as the combination of sensor, will be discussed.

[1]  R. Harrington,et al.  Radiation and scattering from bodies of revolution , 1969 .

[2]  Robert J. Schalkoff,et al.  Pattern recognition - statistical, structural and neural approaches , 1991 .

[3]  Leslie M. Collins Statistical Signal Processing for Demining: Experimental Validation , 1999 .

[4]  I. J. Won,et al.  GEM‐3: A Monostatic Broadband Electromagnetic Induction Sensor , 1997 .

[5]  L. Carin,et al.  Resonances of perfectly conducting wires and bodies of revolution buried in a lossy dispersive half-space , 1996 .

[6]  Gary D. Sower,et al.  Detection and identification of mines from natural magnetic and electromagnetic resonances , 1995, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[7]  Leslie M. Collins,et al.  Enhanced detection of land mines using broadband EMI data , 1999, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[8]  Leslie M. Collins,et al.  Classification of landmine-like metal targets using wideband electromagnetic induction , 2000, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[9]  Leslie M. Collins,et al.  An improved Bayesian decision theoretic approach for land mine detection , 1999, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[10]  John C. Hancock,et al.  Signal Detection Theory , 1966 .

[11]  H. V. Trees Detection, Estimation, And Modulation Theory , 2001 .

[12]  Peter V. Czipott,et al.  Characterization of small metallic objects and nonmetallic antipersonnel mines , 1997, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[13]  Lawrence Carin,et al.  Wideband electromagnetic induction for metal-target identification: theory, measurement, and signal processing , 1998, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[14]  Roger F. Harrington,et al.  Field computation by moment methods , 1968 .