Biological basis of grooming behaviour in antelope: the body-size, vigilance and habitat principles

Abstract Grooming in ungulates has been shown to be very effective in removing ectoparasites. Ectoparasites, especially ticks, may be costly to an animal's resources in terms of blood removed and depression of appetite. There are two opposing models that address the parasite-control of function of grooming: (1) animals may groom in response to stimulation from parasite bites, whereupon those with the most parasites should groom the most; or (2) animals may groom prophylactically, removing parasites such as ticks before they attach, as a reflection of a central programming or timing mechanism. Based on behavioural observations of Thomson's gazelle, Gazella thomsonii , Grant's gazelle, Gazella granti , impala, Aepyceros melampus , and wildebeest, Cannocheates gnu , in Kenya and at the San Diego Wild Animal Park (SDWAP), both models seemed to apply to different aspects of grooming. Presumably, as a reflection of their increased vulnerability to ectoparasites through a greater body surface to mass ratio (body-size principle), Thomson's gazelle were found to groom more frequently than wildebeest. This corresponds to a reportedly smaller number of ticks per m 2 surface area in Thomson's gazelle. Territorial males groomed less frequently than conspecific females and bachelor males, presumably relfecting their need to remain vigilant over females (vigilance principle). Within-species grooming was less in a low-parasite environment (SDWAP) than in a high-parasite environment (Kenya), reflecting both a decreased exposure to parasites (habitat principle) and a decrease in programmed grooming. Impala, which typically inhabit tick-infested woodland areas, orally groomed themselves more than the size-matched Grant's gazelle comparison species, and also engaged in a unique form of reciprocal allogrooming of the head and neck. That the impala allogrooming may also have a tick-removal function was supported by the finding that impala scratch-groom the head and neck less than Grant's gazelle.

[1]  B. Hart,et al.  Comparative differences in densities of adult ticks as a function of body size on some East African antelopes , 1993 .

[2]  R. E. Williams,et al.  Effects of Gulf Coast ticks on blood composition and weights of pastured Hereford steers. , 1978, The Journal of parasitology.

[3]  Murray The ecology of the louse Polyplax serrataq (Burn.) on the Mouse Mus musculus L. , 1961 .

[4]  J. O'kelly,et al.  Alterations in host metabolism by the specific and anorectic effects of the cattle tick (Boophilus microplus). I. Food intake and body weight growth. , 1971, Australian journal of biological sciences.

[5]  J. C. Fentress Development of Grooming in Mice with Amputated Forelimbs , 1973, Science.

[6]  R C BOLLES,et al.  Grooming behavior in the rat. , 1960, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[7]  J. Londt,et al.  Ecological studies of larval ticks in South Africa (Acarina: Ixodidae) , 1972, Parasitology.

[8]  B. Hart,et al.  Autogrooming and Social Grooming in Impala a , 1988 .

[9]  J. C. Fentress,et al.  Deafferentation does not disrupt natural rules of action syntax , 1987, Behavioural Brain Research.

[10]  G. Snowball The effect of self-licking by cattle on infestations of cattle tick, Boophilus microplus (Canestrini) , 1956 .

[11]  G. W. Eddy,et al.  Rearing the Long-Nosed Cattle Louse and Cattle Biting Louse on Host Animals in Oregon , 1967 .

[12]  I. Horak Parasites of domestic and wild animals in South Africa. XV. The seasonal prevalence of ectoparasites on impala and cattle in the Northern Transvaal. , 1982, The Onderstepoort journal of veterinary research.

[13]  F. Patenaude,et al.  Self-grooming and social grooming in the North American beaver, Castor canadensis , 1984 .

[14]  J. C. Fentress,et al.  Expressive Contexts, Fine Structure, and Central Mediation of Rodent Grooming a , 1988, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[15]  A. N. Epstein,et al.  Saliva lost by grooming: a major item in the rat's water economy. , 1974, Behavioral biology.

[16]  A. Mckenzie The ruminant dental grooming apparatus , 1990 .

[17]  G. Garris,et al.  Sampling efficiency of three dragging techniques for the collection of nonparasitic Boophilus microplus (Acari: Ixodidae) larvae in Puerto Rico. , 1985, Journal of economic entomology.

[18]  M. Mooring,et al.  Differential foraging of oxpeckers on impala in comparison with sympatric antelope species , 1990 .

[19]  R. Norval Ecology of the tick Amblyomma hebraeum Koch in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa. I. Distribution and seasonal activity. , 1977, The Journal of parasitology.

[20]  C. Fitzgibbon A cost to individuals with reduced vigilance in groups of Thomson's Gazelles hunted by Cheetahs , 1989, Animal Behaviour.

[21]  H. Turner,et al.  Effects of field infestations of gastrointestinal helminths and of the cattle tick (Boophilus microplus) on growth of three breeds of cattle. , 1972 .

[22]  F. Walther,et al.  Gazelles and Their Relatives: A Study in Territorial Behavior , 1984 .

[23]  G. Bennett Boophilus microplus (acarina: ixodidae): experimental infestations on cattle restrained from grooming. , 1969, Experimental parasitology.

[24]  B. Hart Behavioral adaptations to pathogens and parasites: Five strategies , 1990, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[25]  D. A. Little THE EFFECT OF CATTLE TICK INFESTATION ON THE GROWTH RATE OF CATTLE , 1963 .