Towards a platform for New Concept Development: when kansei and design-thinking approaches meet

This paper, part of a PhD research, focuses on ways to improve new concept development (NCD) activities. This research is done in collaboration with the Kansei Design (KD) division of Toyota Motor Europe (TME), a team composed of designers and engineers bringing a particular dynamism to research and development activities. The paper presents a new platform for NCD aiming to assist the flow of ideas for the creation of user experience. It integrates kansei methodologies as well as more classical design-thinking approaches and uses as basis the analysis of 13 past NCD projects. The kansei approach to design pays particular attention to the different senses involved in the user experience as well as values, emotions and symbols perceived and felt. Kansei-based tools have a large scope. They can be used to provide design-guidelines but also at the creation and evaluation phases. They have also revealed themselves complementary to other approaches and in that way improve the quantity and quality of NCD methods available. These synergies are particularly useful in a context of user experience creation including concepts (function, sensory attributes, values, emotions) and also design strategies.

[1]  Rajiv Grover,et al.  Setting the stage for creative new products: Investigating the idea fruition process , 2006 .

[2]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Perspective: The Stage‐Gate® Idea‐to‐Launch Process—Update, What's New, and NexGen Systems* , 2008 .

[3]  Hideaki Takeda,et al.  Abduction for Creative Design , 2003, Volume 3b: 15th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology.

[4]  Mats Magnusson,et al.  Ideation Capabilities for Continuous Innovation , 2010 .

[5]  M. Einhorn.  Art as Innovation , 2002 .

[6]  David Wilemon,et al.  Focusing the Fuzzy Front-End in New Product Development , 2002 .

[7]  Simon Schütte,et al.  Engineering Emotional Values in Product Design : Kansei Engineering in Development , 2005 .

[8]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Engineering Design Methods: Strategies for Product Design , 1994 .

[9]  James O Prochaska,et al.  A discussion with James O. Prochaska, PhD. Interview by Paul E. Terry. , 2012, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.

[10]  Kees Dorst,et al.  The core of ‘design thinking’ and its application , 2011 .

[11]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Central problems in the management of innovation , 1986 .

[12]  Rajesh Sethi,et al.  Stage-Gate Controls, Learning Failure, and Adverse Effect on Novel New Products , 2008 .

[13]  M. Magnusson,et al.  Where Do Good Innovation Ideas Come From? Exploring the Influence of Network Connectivity on Innovation Idea Quality , 2009 .

[14]  Amaresh Chakrabarti,et al.  Towards an ‘ideal’ approach for concept generation , 2003 .

[15]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges , 2007 .

[16]  Erik Roscam Abbing,et al.  Brand-Driven Innovation , 2010 .

[17]  Monika Kurkkio,et al.  Managing the fuzzy front‐end: insights from process firms , 2011 .

[18]  John S Gero,et al.  Innovation Policy and Design Thinking , 2010 .

[19]  Carole Bouchard,et al.  Creativity Comparisons between Japanese and European at the Concept Creation Stage , 2012 .

[20]  K. R. Jespersen,et al.  Stage-to-Stage Information Dependency in the NPD Process: Effective Learning or a Potential Entrapment of NPD Gates?† , 2012 .

[21]  Jaap Daalhuizen,et al.  Delft Design Guide , 2010 .