Task-specific disruption of perceptual learning.

For more than a century, the process of stabilization has been a central issue in the research of learning and memory. Namely, after a skill or memory is acquired, it must be consolidated before it becomes resistant to disruption by subsequent learning. Although it is clear that there are many cases in which learning can be disrupted, it is unclear when learning something new disrupts what has already been learned. Herein, we provide two answers to this question with the demonstration that perceptual learning of a visual stimulus disrupts or interferes with the consolidation of a previously learned visual stimulus. In this study, we trained subjects on two different hyperacuity tasks and determined whether learning of the second task disrupted that of the first. We first show that disruption of learning occurs between visual stimuli presented at the same orientation in the same retinotopic location but not for the same stimuli presented at retinotopically disparate locations or different orientations at the same location. Second, we show that disruption from stimuli in the same retinotopic location is ameliorated if the subjects wait for 1 h before training on the second task. These results indicate that disruption, at least in visual learning, is specific to features of the tasks and that a temporal delay of 1 h can stabilize visual learning. This research shows that visual learning is susceptible to disruption and elucidates the processes by which the brain can consolidate learning and thus protect what is learned from being overwritten.

[1]  G. Orban,et al.  Human perceptual learning in identifying the oblique orientation: retinotopy, orientation specificity and monocularity. , 1995, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Perceptual learning of spatial localization: specificity for orientation, position, and context. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  Z Liu,et al.  Perceptual learning in motion discrimination that generalizes across motion directions. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  P. Maquet,et al.  Neural correlates of perceptual learning: A functional MRI study of visual texture discrimination , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  M. Kilgard,et al.  Cortical map reorganization enabled by nucleus basalis activity. , 1998, Science.

[6]  Mitsuo Kawato,et al.  Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning , 1999, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[7]  Z L Lu,et al.  Perceptual learning reflects external noise filtering and internal noise reduction through channel reweighting. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  Masakazu Konishi,et al.  Decrystallization of adult birdsong by perturbation of auditory feedback , 1999, Nature.

[9]  M. Fahle,et al.  The role of visual field position in pattern–discrimination learning , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[10]  G. Orban,et al.  Practising orientation identification improves orientation coding in V1 neurons , 2001, Nature.

[11]  T. Poggio,et al.  Fast perceptual learning in hyperacuity , 1995, Vision Research.

[12]  R. Stickgold,et al.  Dissociable stages of human memory consolidation and reconsolidation , 2003, Nature.

[13]  Edward F Chang,et al.  Temporal plasticity in the primary auditory cortex induced by operant perceptual learning , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[14]  M. Kawato,et al.  Modular organization of internal models of tools in the human cerebellum , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  K. H. Britten,et al.  Neuronal plasticity that underlies improvement in perceptual performance. , 1994, Science.

[16]  M. Merzenich,et al.  Cortical remodelling induced by activity of ventral tegmental dopamine neurons , 2001, Nature.

[17]  Shinichi Koyama,et al.  Task-Dependent Changes of the Psychophysical Motion-Tuning Functions in the Course of Perceptual Learning , 2004, Perception.

[18]  A. Fiorentini,et al.  Perceptual learning specific for orientation and spatial frequency , 1980, Nature.

[19]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Perceptual learning and top-down influences in primary visual cortex , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[20]  M. Kawato,et al.  Behavioral/systems/cognitive Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Examination of Two Modular Architectures for Switching Multiple Internal Models , 2022 .

[21]  Misha Tsodyks,et al.  Context-enabled learning in the human visual system , 2002, Nature.

[22]  R Sekuler,et al.  Adaptive processing of visual motion. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  J. Maunsell,et al.  The Effect of Perceptual Learning on Neuronal Responses in Monkey Visual Area V4 , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  Aaron R. Seitz,et al.  Psychophysics: Is subliminal learning really passive? , 2003, Nature.

[25]  Masakazu Konishi,et al.  The Role of Auditory Feedback in Birdsong , 2004, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[26]  José E. Náñez,et al.  Greater plasticity in lower-level than higher-level visual motion processing in a passive perceptual learning task , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[27]  Barbara Anne Dosher,et al.  The spatial window of the perceptual template and endogenous attention , 2004, Vision Research.

[28]  B. Dosher,et al.  Mechanisms of perceptual learning , 1999, Vision Research.

[29]  S. Hochstein,et al.  Task difficulty and the specificity of perceptual learning , 1997, Nature.

[30]  H. Dinse,et al.  Pharmacological Modulation of Perceptual Learning and Associated Cortical Reorganization , 2003, Science.

[31]  M. Kawato,et al.  Random presentation enables subjects to adapt to two opposing forces on the hand , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[32]  R. Schwarting,et al.  Pretreatment With Fragments of Substance-P or With Cholecystokinin Differentially Affects Recovery From Sub-Total Nigrostriatal 6-Hydroxydopamine Lesion , 1999, Neural plasticity.

[33]  C. Gilbert,et al.  The Neural Basis of Perceptual Learning , 2001, Neuron.

[34]  A. Karni,et al.  Dependence on REM sleep of overnight improvement of a perceptual skill. , 1994, Science.

[35]  J. Kaas,et al.  The reorganization of somatosensory cortex following peripheral nerve damage in adult and developing mammals. , 1983, Annual review of neuroscience.

[36]  Alvaro Pascual-Leone,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation and neuroplasticity , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[37]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Neuronal Correlates of Motor Performance and Motor Learning in the Primary Motor Cortex of Monkeys Adapting to an External Force Field , 2001, Neuron.

[38]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Consolidation in human motor memory , 1996, Nature.

[39]  John W. Krakauer,et al.  Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[40]  Michael H. Herzog,et al.  Nonlinear ideal observation and recurrent preprocessing in perceptual learning , 2003 .

[41]  T. Brashers-Krug,et al.  Functional Stages in the Formation of Human Long-Term Motor Memory , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[42]  T Poggio,et al.  Fast perceptual learning in visual hyperacuity. , 1991, Science.

[43]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Sleep-dependent learning: a nap is as good as a night , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[44]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Failure to Consolidate the Consolidation Theory of Learning for Sensorimotor Adaptation Tasks , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[45]  Takeo Watanabe,et al.  Perceptual learning without perception , 2001, Nature.