Comparative study of etomidate and fentanyl citrate with propofol (1%) and fentanyl citrate for total intravenous anaesthesia in short surgical procedures

Total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) is a combination of Induction agents, analgesic drugs and muscle relaxants, excluding simultaneous administration of any inhaled drugs. This study has major objective, to determine the efficacy of Etomidate and Propofol (1%) as anaesthetic induction agents in termed of Induction time, maintenance doses requirements and Recovery parameters. This study suggests that both Etomidate–Fentanyl citrate and propofol (1%)–Fentanyl citrate produced smooth induction, easy maintenance and quick recovery with only minor hemodynamic fluctuations makes them excellent combinations as TIVA technique. Etomidate is preferred over Propofol (1%) especially for hemodynamically unstable patients because of minimal effects on cardiovascular and respiratory system. hypotension and pain on injection was observed more frequently with Propofol (1%) while myoclonus with Etomidate. With these observations in mind and careful selection of patients, both agents appear similarly safe for use in elective and short surgical procedures. Keywords: Fentanyl, Propofol, TIVA, Etomidate.

[1]  A. Bhargava,et al.  Comparison of hemodynamic effects of intravenous etomidate versus propofol during induction and intubation using entropy guided hypnosis levels , 2015, Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology.

[2]  D. Sharma,et al.  A Comparative Evaluation of Propofol-Ketamine and Propofol-Fentanyl As T . I . V . A Techniques In Terms Of Haemodynamic Variables And Recovery Characteristics In Minor Surgeries . , 2015 .

[3]  Dr.A.Hima bindu,et al.  Comparative Study between Propofol and Propofol with Ketamine in Ambulatory Anaesthesia , 2015 .

[4]  M. Basirat,et al.  Sedation with etomidate-fentanyl versus propofol-fentanyl in colonoscopies: A prospective randomized study , 2015, Caspian Journal of Internal Medicine.

[5]  Elham Beheshtian,et al.  Comparison of cardiovascular response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation after induction of anesthesia by Propofol and Etomidate , 2013, Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences.

[6]  G. Afshan,et al.  General Anesthesia with Laryngeal Mask Airway: Etomidate VS Propofol for Hemodynamic Stability , 2012 .

[7]  P. Vardas,et al.  Anaesthesia for cardioversion: a prospective randomised comparison of propofol and etomidate combined with fentanyl. , 2011, Hellenic journal of cardiology : HJC = Hellenike kardiologike epitheorese.

[8]  F. Sarıcaoğlu,et al.  A clinical comparison of etomidate-lipuro, propofol and admixture at induction , 2011, Saudi journal of anaesthesia.

[9]  P. Knapik,et al.  Comparison of propofol and etomidate anaesthesia for elective electrical cardioversion. , 2010, Kardiologia polska.

[10]  S. Gatica,et al.  Alpha-2B adrenergic receptor mediated hemodynamic profile of etomidate. , 2010, Puerto Rico health sciences journal.

[11]  J. Kaur,et al.  Comparison of two drug combinations in total intravenous anesthesia: Propofol–ketamine and propofol–fentanyl , 2010, Saudi journal of anaesthesia.

[12]  D. Sessler,et al.  Dose-dependent hemodynamic effects of propofol induction following brotizolam premedication in hypertensive patients taking angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. , 2010, Journal of clinical anesthesia.

[13]  C. Sprung,et al.  Adrenal function in sepsis: The retrospective Corticus cohort study , 2007, Critical care medicine.

[14]  M. Biros,et al.  Randomized clinical trial of etomidate versus propofol for procedural sedation in the emergency department. , 2007, Annals of emergency medicine.

[15]  S. Eksborg,et al.  Etomidate-Lipuro is associated with considerably less injection pain in children compared with propofol with added lidocaine. , 2006, British journal of anaesthesia.

[16]  V. Mabasa,et al.  Etomidate for rapid sequence intubation in the emergency department: is adrenal suppression a concern? , 2006, CJEM.

[17]  D. Zurakowski,et al.  Hemodynamic Responses to Etomidate on Induction of Anesthesia in Pediatric Patients , 2005, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[18]  Myron Tanenbaum,et al.  Monitored anesthesia care. , 2004, Ophthalmology.

[19]  P. Murray,et al.  Propofol Selectively Attenuates Endothelium-dependent Pulmonary Vasodilation in Chronically Instrumented Dogs , 2000, Anesthesiology.

[20]  K. Yamaura,et al.  Propofol‐induced Increase in Vascular Capacitance Is Due to Inhibition of Sympathetic Vasoconstrictive Activity , 1998, Anesthesiology.

[21]  A. Doenicke,et al.  [Propofol and etomidate-Lipuro for induction of general anesthesia. Hemodynamics, vascular compatibility, subjective findings and postoperative nausea]. , 1996, Der Anaesthesist.

[22]  Jennifer H. Salvon Intravenous Anesthetic Agents , 1994 .

[23]  T H Grasela,et al.  Hemodynamic effects of propofol: data from over 25,000 patients. , 1993, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[24]  Isabelle Murat,et al.  Effects of Fentanyl on Baroreceptor Reflex Control of Heart Rate in Newborn Infants , 1988, Anesthesiology.

[25]  Robert K. Stoelting,et al.  Pharmacology and physiology in anesthetic practice , 1987 .

[26]  J. S. Lundy,et al.  INTRAVENOUS ANESTHESIA , 1940, Anesthesiology.