Evolutionary genomics: Codon volatility does not detect selection (reply)
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Dan Graur,et al. The comparative method rules! Codon volatility cannot detect positive Darwinian selection using a single genome sequence. , 2005, Molecular biology and evolution.
[2] J. J. Emerson,et al. Evolutionary genomics: Codon volatility does not detect selection , 2005, Nature.
[3] M. Hubisz,et al. Evolutionary genomics: Detecting selection needs comparative data , 2005, Nature.
[4] Andrew D. Kern,et al. Evolutionary genomics: Codon bias and selection on single genomes , 2005, Nature.
[5] Joshua B. Plotkin,et al. Detecting selection using a single genome sequence of M. tuberculosis and P. falciparum , 2004, Nature.
[6] L. Katz,et al. Dramatic diversity of ciliate histone H4 genes revealed by comparisons of patterns of substitutions and paralog divergences among eukaryotes. , 2004, Molecular biology and evolution.
[7] M. Adams,et al. Inferring Nonneutral Evolution from Human-Chimp-Mouse Orthologous Gene Trios , 2003, Science.
[8] S. Salzberg,et al. Whole-Genome Comparison of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Clinical and Laboratory Strains , 2002, Journal of bacteriology.
[9] M. Huynen,et al. Neutral evolution of mutational robustness. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[10] F. Tajima. The amount of DNA polymorphism maintained in a finite population when the neutral mutation rate varies among sites. , 1996, Genetics.
[11] O. Berg,et al. Selection intensity for codon bias and the effective population size of Escherichia coli. , 1996, Genetics.
[12] N. Goldman,et al. A codon-based model of nucleotide substitution for protein-coding DNA sequences. , 1994, Molecular biology and evolution.
[13] S. Wright. Evolution in mendelian populations , 1931 .
[14] Mandy J. Haldane,et al. A Mathematical Theory of Natural and Artificial Selection, Part V: Selection and Mutation , 1927, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.