Evolutionary genomics: Codon volatility does not detect selection (reply)

[1]  Dan Graur,et al.  The comparative method rules! Codon volatility cannot detect positive Darwinian selection using a single genome sequence. , 2005, Molecular biology and evolution.

[2]  J. J. Emerson,et al.  Evolutionary genomics: Codon volatility does not detect selection , 2005, Nature.

[3]  M. Hubisz,et al.  Evolutionary genomics: Detecting selection needs comparative data , 2005, Nature.

[4]  Andrew D. Kern,et al.  Evolutionary genomics: Codon bias and selection on single genomes , 2005, Nature.

[5]  Joshua B. Plotkin,et al.  Detecting selection using a single genome sequence of M. tuberculosis and P. falciparum , 2004, Nature.

[6]  L. Katz,et al.  Dramatic diversity of ciliate histone H4 genes revealed by comparisons of patterns of substitutions and paralog divergences among eukaryotes. , 2004, Molecular biology and evolution.

[7]  M. Adams,et al.  Inferring Nonneutral Evolution from Human-Chimp-Mouse Orthologous Gene Trios , 2003, Science.

[8]  S. Salzberg,et al.  Whole-Genome Comparison of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Clinical and Laboratory Strains , 2002, Journal of bacteriology.

[9]  M. Huynen,et al.  Neutral evolution of mutational robustness. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  F. Tajima.  The amount of DNA polymorphism maintained in a finite population when the neutral mutation rate varies among sites. , 1996, Genetics.

[11]  O. Berg,et al.  Selection intensity for codon bias and the effective population size of Escherichia coli. , 1996, Genetics.

[12]  N. Goldman,et al.  A codon-based model of nucleotide substitution for protein-coding DNA sequences. , 1994, Molecular biology and evolution.

[13]  S. Wright.  Evolution in mendelian populations , 1931 .

[14]  Mandy J. Haldane,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Natural and Artificial Selection, Part V: Selection and Mutation , 1927, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.