Groundwater risk assessment at a heavily industrialised catchment and the associated impacts on a peri-urban wetland.

Industrial and agricultural activities often impose significant pressures to the groundwater quality and consequently degrade wetland ecosystems that depend mostly on subsurface water flow. Groundwater vulnerability and risk mapping is a widely used approach to assess the natural protection of aquifers and the associated pollution potential from human activities. In the particular study, the relatively new Pan-European methodology (COP method) has been applied in a highly industrialized peri-urban wetland catchment, located close to Athens city, to map the intrinsic vulnerability of the aquifer and evaluate the risk potential originating from local land uses. Groundwater analysis results for various parameters, including Phenols, PCBs and nutrients, have been used to validate the vulnerability and risk estimations while a biological assessment occurred to associate the mapping results with the wetland's ecological status. The results indicated that even though the natural protection of the aquifer is relatively high due to the dominant hydrogeologic and geomorphologic conditions, the groundwater pollution risk is considerable, mainly because of the existing hazardous land uses. The water quality of the groundwater accredited these findings and the ecological status of this peri-urban wetland also indicated significant impacts from industrial effluents.

[1]  M Loizidou,et al.  Integrated environmental monitoring and simulation system for use as a management decision support tool in urban areas. , 2002, Journal of environmental management.

[2]  J. Vrba,et al.  Guidebook on Mapping Groundwater Vulnerability , 1994 .

[3]  S. Fletcher,et al.  Evaluating factors influencing groundwater vulnerability to nitrate pollution: developing the potential of GIS. , 2003, Journal of environmental management.

[4]  T. Koussouris,et al.  The environmental state of freshwater resources in Greece (rivers and lakes) , 1998 .

[5]  B. Dixon Groundwater vulnerability mapping: A GIS and fuzzy rule based integrated tool , 2005 .

[6]  Rida Al-Adamat,et al.  Groundwater vulnerability and risk mapping for the Basaltic aquifer of the Azraq basin of Jordan using GIS, Remote sensing and DRASTIC , 2003 .

[7]  P. Kitanidis Introduction to Geostatistics: Applications in Hydrogeology , 1997 .

[8]  H. Cook,et al.  Nitrate Vulnerable Zones and Nitrate Sensitive Areas: A Policy and Technical Analysis of Groundwater Source Protection in England and Wales , 1997 .

[9]  Maria Loizidou,et al.  A study on the landfill leachate and its impact on the groundwater quality of the greater area , 1999 .

[10]  V. Samanidou,et al.  Comparative study of heavy metals pollution in various rivers and lakes of northern Greece , 1987 .

[11]  A study of oil pollution effects on the ecology of a coastal lake ecosystem , 1997 .

[12]  C. Giupponi,et al.  A multicriteria approach for mapping risks of agricultural pollution for water resources: The Venice Lagoon watershed case study , 1999 .

[13]  Steven M. Gorelick,et al.  Design of Optimal, Reliable Plume Capture Schemes: Application to the Gloucester Landfill Ground‐Water Contamination Problem , 1993 .

[14]  Tetsuya Hiyama,et al.  A GIS-based DRASTIC model for assessing aquifer vulnerability in Kakamigahara Heights, Gifu Prefecture, central Japan. , 2005, The Science of the total environment.

[15]  H. Hötzl,et al.  Karst groundwater protection: First application of a Pan-European Approach to vulnerability, hazard and risk mapping in the Sierra de Líbar (Southern Spain). , 2006, The Science of the total environment.