Age Differences in Implicit and Explicit Associative Memory: Exploring Elaborative Processing Effects

Abstract Research in memory processes suggests implicit memory is more resistant to the effects of aging than explicit memory. Two experiments examined how variations in level of processing affect memory for novel word-pair associations across age groups. The results indicate that new learning may rely on some degree of elàborate and even explicit processing and that older adults show deficits in any form of new learning. Explicit associative memory benefited from elaborative processing for both age groups and age differences appeared to relate to overall working-memory capacity rather than effective use of elaborative processes. These results support a model of associative memory that distinguishes automatic unconscious processes versus conscious controlled processes in which older adults exhibit deficits in associative memory tasks that actually rely on consciously controlled processes.

[1]  F. Craik,et al.  Levels of Pro-cessing: A Framework for Memory Research , 1975 .

[2]  G. Mandler,et al.  Activation makes words more accessible, but not necessarily more retrievable. , 1984 .

[3]  D. Schacter,et al.  Implicit and explicit memory for new associations in normal and amnesic subjects. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[4]  D. Schacter,et al.  Effects of elaborative processing on implicit and explicit memory for new associations. , 1986 .

[5]  D L Schacter,et al.  Preserved learning in amnesic patients: perspectives from research on direct priming. , 1986, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[6]  Larry L. Jacoby,et al.  Unconscious Influences of Memory for a Prior Event , 1987 .

[7]  L. Cermak,et al.  Deficits in the implicit retention of new associations by alcoholic Korsakoff patients , 1988, Brain and Cognition.

[8]  L R Squire,et al.  Impaired priming of new associations in amnesia. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  Unitization and grouping mediate dissociations in memory for new , 1989 .

[10]  D. G. MacKay,et al.  Chapter Five Cognition and Aging: A Theory of New Learning and the Use of Old Connections , 1990 .

[11]  M. Masson,et al.  Adult age differences in direct and indirect tests of memory. , 1991, Journal of gerontology.

[12]  L. Jacoby A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory , 1991 .

[13]  A. Fry,et al.  Aging and memory for new associations: direct versus indirect measures. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[14]  M. Masson,et al.  Implicit memory for new associations : an interactive process approach , 1991 .

[15]  L L Light,et al.  Direct and indirect measures of memory for modality in young and older adults. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[16]  L. Squire,et al.  Nonverbal priming in amnesia , 1992, Memory & cognition.

[17]  L L Light,et al.  Adult age differences in repetition priming: a meta-analysis. , 1994, Psychology and aging.

[18]  M. Masson,et al.  Adult age differences in perceptually based, but not conceptually based implicit tests of memory. , 1995, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[19]  L L Light,et al.  Repetition priming of nonwords in young and older adults. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[20]  G. Bower Reactivating a Reactivation Theory of Implicit Memory , 1996, Consciousness and Cognition.

[21]  E. Reingold,et al.  SEPARATING CONSCIOUSLY CONTROLLED AND AUTOMATIC INFLUENCES IN MEMORY FOR NEW ASSOCIATIONS , 1996 .

[22]  E. McKone,et al.  Explicit contamination in “implicit” memory for new associations , 1997, Memory & cognition.