Metrological characterization of algorithms adopted for voltage dip measurement

This paper analyzes accuracy of algorithms commonly adopted in instrument devoted to the detection and the characterization of voltage dips (also called sags). This analysis is particularly interesting because the results of dip measurements are utilized for calculation of severity levels and the site index assessment that are parameters adopted in determination of quality level of power supply but also in developing planning and design criteria of new electrical power grid or for selecting equipment with proper intrinsic immunity. Anyway there is a certain degree of freedom is left to instrument manufacturers (f.i. the choice of dip detection algorithm) and it can be found that, different instruments significantly disagree in some actual measurements. The paper analyzes most diffused dip detection algorithms presenting the introduced systematic deviations in event characterization. The obtained results are aimed to be taken into account and applied to performance verification of a commercial dip monitoring instrument.

[1]  Carmine Landi,et al.  Real-Time Digital Multifunction Instrument for Power Quality Integrated Indexes Measurement , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[2]  Carmine Landi,et al.  A New Methodological Approach to Quality Assurance of Energy Meters Under Nonsinusoidal Conditions , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[3]  Germain Beaulieu,et al.  Power quality indices and objectives , 2005 .

[4]  C. Landi,et al.  A New Methodological Approach to Quality Assurance of Energy Meters Under Non-Sinusoidal Conditions , 2006, 2006 IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference Proceedings.

[5]  Irene Yu-Hua Gu,et al.  Signal processing of power quality disturbances , 2006 .

[6]  Daniele Gallo,et al.  Distributed laboratory for metrological confirmation of power quality instruments , 2005, IEEE Symposium on Virtual Environments, Human-Computer Interfaces and Measurement Systems, 2005..

[7]  Antonio Pietrosanto,et al.  Structured approach to estimate the measurement uncertainty in digital signal elaboration algorithms , 1999 .

[8]  A. Testa,et al.  Guide to Quality of Electrical Supply for Industrial Installations , 2000 .

[9]  Giovanni Bucci,et al.  Digital measurement equipment for steady-state PQ measurements , 2003, 2003 IEEE Bologna Power Tech Conference Proceedings,.

[10]  C. Landi,et al.  Performance Analysis of Power Quality Monitoring Instruments , 2008, 2008 IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference.

[11]  M. Waclawiak,et al.  Indices for assessing utility distribution system RMS variation performance , 1998 .