Approximate Unitary n2/3-Designs Give Rise to Quantum Channels with Super Additive Classical Holevo Capacity

In a breakthrough, Hastings' showed that there exist quantum channels whose classical capacity is superadditive i.e. more classical information can be transmitted by quantum encoding strategies entangled across multiple channel uses as compared to unentangled quantum encoding strategies. Hastings' proof used Haar random unitaries to exhibit superadditivity. In this paper we show that a unitary chosen uniformly at random from an approximate $n^{2/3}$-design gives rise to a quantum channel with superadditive classical Holevo capacity, where $n$ is the dimension of the unitary exhibiting the Stinespring dilation of the channel superoperator. We prove a sharp Dvoretzky-like theorem (similar to Aubrun, Szarek, Werner, 2010) stating that, with high probability under the choice of a unitary from an approximate $t$-design, random subspaces of large dimension make a Lipschitz function take almost constant value. Such theorems were known earlier only for Haar random unitaries. We obtain our result by appealing to Low's technique for proving concentration of measure for an approximate $t$-design, combined with a stratified analysis of the variational behaviour of Lipschitz functions on the unit sphere in high dimension. The stratified analysis is the main technical advance of this work. Finally we also show that for any $p>1$, approximate unitary $(n^{1.7} \log n)$-designs give rise to channels violating subadditivity of Renyi $p$-entropy. In addition to stratified analysis, the proof of this result uses a new technique of approximating a monotonic differentiable function defined on a closed bounded interval and its derivative by moderate degree polynomials which should be of independent interest. Hence, our work can be viewed as a partial derandomisation of Hastings' result and a step towards the quest of finding an explicit quantum channel with superadditive classical Holevo capacity.

[1]  Aram W. Harrow,et al.  Counterexamples to Additivity of Minimum Output p-Rényi Entropy for p Close to 0 , 2007, 0712.3628.

[2]  G. Schechtman A remark concerning the dependence on ɛ in dvoretzky's theorem , 1989 .

[3]  F. Brandão,et al.  Local random quantum circuits are approximate polynomial-designs: numerical results , 2012, 1208.0692.

[4]  G. Pisier The volume of convex bodies and Banach space geometry , 1989 .

[5]  Aditya Nema,et al.  Approximate unitary designs give rise to quantum channels with super additive classical capacity , 2019 .

[6]  R. Werner,et al.  On Some Additivity Problems in Quantum Information Theory , 2000, math-ph/0003002.

[7]  P. Shor Equivalence of Additivity Questions in Quantum Information Theory , 2003, quant-ph/0305035.

[8]  Christopher King,et al.  Properties of Conjugate Channels with Applications to Additivity and Multiplicativity , 2005 .

[9]  M. Hastings Superadditivity of communication capacity using entangled inputs , 2009 .

[10]  Claude E. Shannon,et al.  The mathematical theory of communication , 1950 .

[11]  L. Mirsky SYMMETRIC GAUGE FUNCTIONS AND UNITARILY INVARIANT NORMS , 1960 .

[13]  Andreas J. Winter,et al.  Counterexamples to the Maximal p-Norm Multiplicativity Conjecture for all p > 1 , 2008, ArXiv.

[14]  Greg Kuperberg Numerical Cubature from Archimedes' Hat-box Theorem , 2006, SIAM J. Numer. Anal..

[15]  Andrei Pomeransky Strong superadditivity of the entanglement of formation follows from its additivity , 2003 .

[16]  A. Fujiwara,et al.  Additivity of the capacity of depolarizing channels , 2002 .

[17]  Z. Da A new proof of Федоров theorem , 2003 .

[18]  Ion Nechita,et al.  Almost One Bit Violation for the Additivity of the Minimum Output Entropy , 2013, Communications in Mathematical Physics.

[19]  Y. Gordon Some inequalities for Gaussian processes and applications , 1985 .

[20]  P. Shor Additivity of the classical capacity of entanglement-breaking quantum channels , 2002, quant-ph/0201149.

[21]  A. Guionnet,et al.  An Introduction to Random Matrices , 2009 .

[22]  C. King The capacity of the quantum depolarizing channel , 2003, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[23]  Pranab Sen Efficient quantum tensor product expanders and unitary t-designs via the zigzag product. , 2018 .

[24]  R. Werner,et al.  Counterexample to an additivity conjecture for output purity of quantum channels , 2002, quant-ph/0203003.

[25]  Greg KUPERBERGt,et al.  NUMERICAL CUBATURE FROM ARCHIMEDES' HAT-BOX , 2006 .

[26]  C. King Additivity for unital qubit channels , 2001, quant-ph/0103156.

[27]  Guillaume Aubrun,et al.  Non-additivity of Renyi entropy and Dvoretzky's Theorem , 2009, 0910.1189.

[28]  Guillaume Aubrun,et al.  Hastings’s Additivity Counterexample via Dvoretzky’s Theorem , 2010, 1003.4925.

[29]  M. Horodecki,et al.  Constructive counterexamples to the additivity of the minimum output Rényi entropy of quantum channels for all p > 2 , 2009, 0911.2515.

[30]  V. Koltchinskii,et al.  High Dimensional Probability , 2006, math/0612726.

[31]  Hiroshi Nagaoka,et al.  Numerical Experiments on The Capacity of Quantum Channel with Entangled Input States , 2000 .

[32]  Charles H. Bennett,et al.  Mixed-state entanglement and quantum error correction. , 1996, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[33]  R. A. Low Large deviation bounds for k-designs , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.